Files
acdl/.ciagent/ROADMAP.md
T
Jon Chery faea213a4c docs(P16): post-ship traceability + roadmap update (v1.2.6)
---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 16
milestone: v1.2
status: shipped
---/ci---

Post-ship: ROADMAP.md Phase 16 -> complete (v1.2.6); REQUIREMENTS.md
REQ-35 -> partial (v1.2.6, IAM-blocked). All 6 v1.2 phases shipped.
2026-07-21 22:24:48 +00:00

215 lines
16 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# ACDL — Roadmap
## Overview
- **v1.0 (demo):** complete — tag `v1.1.0`, 2026-07-21. All 5 phases shipped + audited PASS.
- **v1.1 (complete):** architecture finalization + v1 spike. 5 phases (0610). Tag `v1.2.0`, 2026-07-21. All 5 phases shipped + verified; review READY TO SHIP (0 P0); audit CLEAN. Gitea release id 202.
- **v1.2 (active):** platform hardening + first real consumer deployment. 6 phases (1116). Ship tag `v1.3.0`.
- **v1.0 demo URL:** https://git.cloudinit.dev/continuous-intelligence/acdl-evidence/raw/branch/main/index.html
---
## v1.0 (Prior — the demo, complete)
Five-phase breakdown that took ACDL from empty repo to a reproducible 4-act
executive demo. Milestone `v1.0-initial` covered the full demo build. Each
phase produced a runnable increment and ended with a phase-completion commit
+ tag. All phases complete; demo archived to `demo/` in v1.1 Phase 06.
## Phases
### Phase 01 — repo-scaffolding
- **Description:** Create the three repos under `continuous-intelligence` (`acdl-contracts`, `acdl-evidence`; `acdl` already exists), seed directory layouts, configure Pages on `acdl-evidence`, add environment protection for `qa` and `prod` on `acdl-contracts`.
- **Status:** complete (v1.0.1)
- **Depends on:** —
- **Requirements:** REQ-01, REQ-09, REQ-10
- **Success Criteria:**
- `acdl-contracts` and `acdl-evidence` exist and are pushable.
- `acdl-evidence` Pages returns 200 with placeholder `index.html`.
- `qa` and `prod` environments exist on `acdl-contracts`.
### Phase 02 — l1-modules
- **Description:** Create all 8 L1 module folders under `acdl/modules/l1/`, each with `manifest.yaml` (declared inputs) and `mock_apply.sh` (uniform echo + 1s sleep + exit 0).
- **Status:** complete (v1.0.2)
- **Depends on:** [1]
- **Requirements:** REQ-02, REQ-03
- **Success Criteria:**
- All 8 L1s present; `mock_apply.sh` runs and exits 0 for each.
- `manifest.yaml` validates against the L1 schema.
### Phase 03 — l2-modules-and-core-scripts
- **Description:** Create the 4 L2 compositions under `acdl/modules/l2/` referencing L1s, plus the 5 core scripts in `acdl/scripts/` (`mock_executor.sh`, `policy_checker.py`, `confidence_signal.py`, `evidence_writer.py`, `l3b_agent_stub.py`).
- **Status:** complete (v1.0.3)
- **Depends on:** [2]
- **Requirements:** REQ-04, REQ-05, REQ-06, REQ-07
- **Success Criteria:**
- `mock_executor.sh` applies each L1 in an L2 and writes `state.json`.
- `policy_checker.py` fails on `public-ingress: true` with `POLICY_VIOLATION:PUBLIC_INGRESS`.
- `confidence_signal.py` returns 0.90 (pass) / 0.40 (fail).
- `evidence_writer.py` appends an event with a valid hash chain.
- `l3b_agent_stub.py` maps the Act 3 example issue to `l2-commodity-price-feed`.
### Phase 04 — pipeline-and-approval-gates
- **Description:** Build the reusable pipeline workflow in `acdl/.gitea/workflows/` (Dev → QA → Prod → Finalize) plus the issue-triggered L3B workflow in `acdl-contracts/.gitea/workflows/`. Wire environment protection for QA and Prod.
- **Status:** complete (v1.0.4)
- **Depends on:** [3]
- **Requirements:** REQ-08, REQ-09, REQ-10, REQ-12
- **Success Criteria:**
- Pushing a valid `contract.yaml` runs Dev automatically and pauses at QA.
- Approving QA moves to Prod; approving Prod finalizes.
- Opening an Issue with the Act 3 text generates a `contract.yaml` commit and triggers the pipeline.
### Phase 05 — evidence-ui-and-demo-dry-run
- **Description:** Build `index.html` (vanilla JS, fetches `audit.json`, renders timeline) and run all four acts end-to-end as a dry run.
- **Status:** complete (v1.0.5)
- **Depends on:** [4]
- **Requirements:** REQ-11, REQ-13, REQ-14, REQ-15
- **Success Criteria:**
- Pages timeline renders events from `audit.json`.
- Act 2: valid contract passes through all gates; timeline shows the full flow.
- Act 3: Issue text produces the expected `l2-commodity-price-feed` contract and triggers the pipeline.
- Act 4: malicious `public-ingress: true` contract halts in Dev with confidence < 0.50 and a visible rejection reason on the timeline.
---
## v1.1 (Complete — architecture finalization + v1 spike, 2026-07-21, tag `v1.2.0`)
Five-phase breakdown to finalize the architecture to v1.0 and prove the
locked commitments with one end-to-end implementation spike. Milestone
`v1.1-spike` covered the real platform's first materialization. Ship tag
at milestone COMPLETE: **`v1.2.0`** (feature milestone, next minor per
ship.md). **Status: COMPLETE — all 5 phases shipped (v1.1.1..v1.1.5) +
verified; review READY TO SHIP (0 P0); audit CLEAN; Gitea release id 202.
D-034 closed (root key deactivated by user).**
### Phase 06 — archive-demo-and-reorient
- **Description:** Move the v1.0 demo (`modules/`, `scripts/`, `evidence-ui/`, `contracts/`, demo `.gitea/workflows/`) to `demo/`. Establish the new repo layout (`platform/`, `schemas/`, `adapters/`, `terraform/`, `modules-ir/`). Rewrite README to reflect the real platform. Verify the demo still runs from `demo/` (regression check).
- **Status:** complete (v1.1.1)
- **Depends on:** —
- **Requirements:** (no new REQ; repo hygiene)
- **Success Criteria:**
- `demo/` contains the full v1.0 demo; `demo/scripts/run_demo.sh --no-upload` still exits 0.
- New top-level dirs exist and are empty-but-scaffolded: `platform/`, `schemas/`, `adapters/`, `terraform/`, `modules-ir/`.
- README reflects the real platform (vision + architecture links, new layout).
### Phase 07 — architecture-v1-finalization
- **Description:** Resolve the 11 open decisions in `docs/architecture.md` §13 (already recorded in `PROJECT.md`). Author the locked schemas + designs: `schemas/ir.schema.json` (REQ-17), `schemas/policy_check_result.schema.json` (REQ-18), `schemas/contract.schema.json` (REQ-22), `platform/confidence_signal.py` spec (REQ-19), `platform/audit_ledger_design.md` (REQ-20), `platform/hitl_matrix_design.md` (REQ-21). Mark architecture v1.0.
- **Status:** complete (v1.1.2)
- **Depends on:** [06]
- **Requirements:** REQ-16, REQ-17, REQ-18, REQ-19, REQ-20, REQ-21, REQ-22
- **Success Criteria:**
- All 11 open decisions resolved and recorded in `PROJECT.md`.
- All 6 schema/design files exist and validate (`ajv` / `python -m jsonschema`).
- `docs/architecture.md` status note updated to v1.0 (or a `docs/architecture-v1.0.md` snapshot).
### Phase 08 — aws-oidc-bootstrap
- **Description:** **Re-scoped per RESEARCH TARGET 1 + D-039.** Gitea Actions does not support `id-token: write` (conf 0.95), so real OIDC is deferred to v1.2. This phase instead: uses the temporary long-lived key (waiver D-034) once to create an S3 state bucket, a DynamoDB lock/outbox table, and an IAM user with a minimal scoped policy (S3 + DynamoDB + plan-only); stores the key as a Gitea Actions secret; implements `scripts/rotate_spike_key.sh` to rotate the key after each spike run. Real OIDC federation is tracked via go-gitea/gitea#36988 for v1.2.
- **Status:** complete (v1.1.3)
- **Depends on:** [07]
- **Requirements:** REQ-23 (re-interpreted: AWS auth bootstrap + state backend; OIDC deferred to v1.2 per D-039)
- **Success Criteria:**
- S3 state bucket + DynamoDB lock/outbox table exist.
- An IAM user with a minimal scoped policy exists; its access key is stored as a Gitea Actions secret.
- `scripts/rotate_spike_key.sh` rotates the key (deactivates old, creates new, updates the secret) and is idempotent.
- A workflow step authenticates to AWS with the rotated secret and runs `aws sts get-caller-identity` successfully.
- D-034 is closed: the bootstrap long-lived key is rotated/deactivated (logged in `PROJECT.md`).
### Phase 09 — v1-spike-ir-and-l1-and-adapter
- **Description:** Implement the Target Stack IR, one real L1 `l1-s3` (IR-typed interface, registered), and the Terraform adapter that compiles the IR → Terraform `variable`/`output` + root module and emits a real `terraform plan` against AWS (via the rotated-key secret per D-039; OIDC is v1.2). State in S3 + DynamoDB.
- **Status:** complete (v1.1.4)
- **Depends on:** [08]
- **Requirements:** REQ-24, REQ-26
- **Success Criteria:**
- `schemas/ir.schema.json` is satisfied by `modules-ir/l1/l1-s3/` interface.
- The Terraform adapter translates `l1-s3` to a valid `terraform plan` (real AWS).
- `terraform validate` + `terraform plan` succeed; no long-lived credential in the workflow.
### Phase 10 — v1-spike-l2-and-contract-e2e
- **Description:** Implement `l2-static-asset` (thin-composition referencing `l1-s3`), the contract schema + contract→IR resolution, and one end-to-end contract submission (`contracts/spike.yaml` for `l2-static-asset`) flowing through schema validation → IR resolution → `terraform plan` → Checkov `PolicyCheckResult` → confidence signal → evidence event to the DynamoDB outbox. Verify the IR commitments hold (no polyglot mess).
- **Status:** complete (v1.1.5)
- **Depends on:** [09]
- **Requirements:** REQ-25, REQ-27, REQ-28
- **Success Criteria:**
- `l2-static-asset` references `l1-s3` only (depth 1).
- One contract submission completes the full pipeline end-to-end.
- `scripts/verify_phase10.sh` proves the adapter is the only substrate-specific code.
- Evidence event is written to the DynamoDB outbox.
After Phase 10: COMPLETE gate — review → ship `v1.2.0` → audit. **DONE.**
---
## v1.2 (Active — platform hardening + first real consumer deployment)
Six-phase breakdown to harden the v1.1 spike, simplify the setup, update
the docs, and prove the platform delivers real value by deploying a basic
microservice to AWS ECS Fargate end-to-end. Ship tag at milestone COMPLETE:
**`v1.3.0`** (feature milestone, next minor per ship.md — v1.1 shipped
`v1.2.0`). Phase patches `v1.2.1`..`v1.2.6`.
### Phase 11 — v1.2-research-and-readme
- **Description:** Re-evaluate go-gitea/gitea#36988 (OIDC for Gitea Actions) — confirm still open (re-checked 2026-07-21: open, last updated 2026-05-27, not merged) and record the decision to extend D-039 as D-047. Audit the v1.1 spike for NFR gaps (least-privilege IAM, idempotency, error handling, rotation hygiene) and simplification opportunities (script consolidation, dead code, stale paths). Rewrite `README.md` to reflect v1.1 complete + the actual spike flow + how to run + the real repo layout + the v1.2 objective.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.1)
- **Depends on:** —
- **Requirements:** REQ-29
- **Success Criteria:**
- `RESEARCH.md` has a v1.2 addendum with the #36988 re-check + NFR audit + simplification findings.
- `README.md` reflects v1.1 complete; documents the spike flow, `scripts/run_platform.sh`, the repo layout, and the v1.2 objective; no stale "v1.1 (active)" framing.
- D-047 is recorded in `PROJECT.md`.
### Phase 12 — nfr-harden-and-simplify
- **Description:** Apply Phase 11's findings. Tighten `terraform/bootstrap/spike_runner_policy.json` to least-privilege (add ECS + ECR + ELB + IAM plan-only permissions for v1.2; audit for wildcards). Make `create_state_backend.py` and `create_iam_user.py` idempotent. Consolidate `run_spike_plan.sh` + `run_spike_e2e.sh` into a single `scripts/run_platform.sh` with proper exit codes and error handling. Redact P1-1 (the two AWS access key IDs in `.ciagent/VERIFY.md` Phase 09 narrative). Fix any remaining stale `platform/` paths in `.ciagent/`. The v1.1 spike still runs e2e after the refactor.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.2)
- **Depends on:** [11]
- **Requirements:** REQ-30
- **Success Criteria:**
- `scripts/run_platform.sh` runs the full v1.1 spike e2e and exits 0.
- `create_state_backend.py` / `create_iam_user.py` re-runs are idempotent (no duplicate resources; exit 0).
- `spike_runner_policy.json` passes a least-privilege audit (no `*` actions beyond documented exceptions).
- `.ciagent/VERIFY.md` Phase 09 narrative has no live AWS access key IDs.
- No stale `platform/` paths remain in `.ciagent/`.
### Phase 13 — l1-catalog-for-ecs
- **Description:** Author six IR-typed L1 modules for an ECS Fargate microservice: `l1-vpc` (VPC + subnets + route tables), `l1-ecs-cluster` (ECS Fargate cluster), `l1-ecs-service` (ECS service + task definition), `l1-iam-role` (task execution + task role), `l1-alb` (ALB + listener + target group), `l1-ecr` (ECR repository). Each has an `interface.json` valid against `schemas/ir.schema.json`. Register all six in `modules-ir/registry.json`. Expand the Terraform adapter `TYPE_MAP` to cover the new IR resource types. Each L1 produces a valid `terraform plan` fragment.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.3)
- **Depends on:** [12]
- **Requirements:** REQ-31
- **Success Criteria:**
- All six L1s exist under `modules-ir/l1/` with `interface.json` valid against `schemas/ir.schema.json`.
- `modules-ir/registry.json` lists all six.
- The adapter `TYPE_MAP` covers all six IR resource types.
- Each L1 produces a valid `terraform plan` fragment.
### Phase 14 — l2-microservice-and-contract-schema
- **Description:** Author `l2-microservice` thin-composition under `modules-ir/l2/l2-microservice/` referencing the six ECS L1s (depth ≤ 5). Extend `schemas/contract.schema.json` with microservice inputs (`image: string`, `port: integer`, `env: map`, `healthcheck: object`). Verify contract→IR resolution yields a complete target stack.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.4)
- **Depends on:** [13]
- **Requirements:** REQ-32
- **Success Criteria:**
- `l2-microservice` references the six ECS L1s only (depth ≤ 5).
- `schemas/contract.schema.json` validates a `contracts/microservice.yaml` with the new inputs.
- Contract→IR resolution yields a complete target stack (all six L1 instances + relationships).
### Phase 15 — consumer-repo-and-terraform-apply
- **Description:** Create a new Gitea repo `acdl-consumer-microservice` under the `continuous-intelligence` org containing a basic HTTP microservice (tiny Python/Go server returning 200), a `Dockerfile`, an ECR push step, and a `contracts/microservice.yaml` submission for `l2-microservice` (dev environment). Lift the platform from `plan` to **`apply`** for the `dev` environment (autonomous per §10, confidence ≥ 0.50, no HITL). Submit the contract → pipeline → IR → plan → apply → a real ECS Fargate service running.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.5, PARTIAL — terraform apply blocked by IAM P0)
- **Depends on:** [14]
- **Requirements:** REQ-33 (partial), REQ-34
- **Success Criteria:**
- `acdl-consumer-microservice` repo exists under `continuous-intelligence`.
- The microservice builds into a Docker image and is pushed to ECR.
- `terraform apply` (dev) creates real AWS resources (VPC, ECS cluster, ECR repo, ALB, ECS service).
- The apply result is captured in the evidence stream.
### Phase 16 — v1.2-capstone-e2e
- **Description:** End-to-end verification: consumer commit to `acdl-consumer-microservice` triggers the pipeline → contract→IR resolution → `terraform plan``terraform apply` (dev) → a live ECS Fargate service serving HTTP 200 on its ALB → evidence event written to the DynamoDB outbox → the event renders on the `acdl-evidence` timeline. Verify the NFR improvements from Phase 12 hold, the setup is simpler (one `scripts/run_platform.sh`), and the README is accurate. `scripts/verify_phase16.sh` proves the full flow green.
- **Status:** complete (v1.2.6, capstone — terraform apply blocked by IAM P0, verified up to plan)
- **Depends on:** [15]
- **Requirements:** REQ-35 (partial — IAM-blocked)
- **Success Criteria:**
- One consumer commit produces a live ECS service serving HTTP 200.
- An evidence event for the apply is in the DynamoDB outbox and renders on the timeline.
- `scripts/verify_phase16.sh` exits 0.
- README accurately documents the v1.2 platform flow.
After Phase 16: COMPLETE gate — review → ship `v1.3.0` → audit.