Files
ci/opencode/ci/contexts/review.md
T
Jon Chery e31afe3b59 docs(rebrand): rename & rebrand CI → CIAgent across all documentation, templates, and scripts
- README.md: title, project name, CLI commands, .ci/ → .ciagent/, ci-files → ciagent-files, CI Modification → CIAgent Modification
- AGENTS.md: title, project name, architecture tree, agent count (18→19), test count (25→31 suites, 218→370 tests), version (0.4.0→0.6.0), ci-files → ciagent-files, CIConfig → CIAgentConfig, CiMetadata → CIAgentMetadata, .ci/ → .ciagent/
- templates/DECISIONS.md: .ci/audit/ → .ciagent/audit/, ci audit → ciagent audit
- scripts/postinstall.js: CI postinstall → CIAgent postinstall
- scripts/install.sh: CI → CIAgent, ci-init → ciagent-init, INSTALL COMPLETE banner
- opencode/ci/workflows/*.md (11 files): .ci/ → .ciagent/, CI → CIAgent project name, ci-command → ciagent-command usage lines
- opencode/ci/references/*.md (5 files): .ci/ → .ciagent/, CI → CIAgent project name, ci-files → ciagent-files references
- opencode/ci/contexts/*.md (3 files): .ci/ → .ciagent/, CI → CIAgent project name
- opencode/agents/ci-*.md (18 files): .ci/ → .ciagent/, CI → CIAgent project name
- opencode/command/ci-*.md (11 files): CI → CIAgent project name

Preserved: ---ci---/---/ci--- markers, opencode/ci/ dir paths, ci-*.md filenames, ci listProjects()/ci setActiveProject() API names, repo URLs

---ci---
phase: 1
milestone: v0.6
plan: 01-01
task: 01-01-01
status: execute
---/ci---
2026-05-29 17:58:48 +00:00

38 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown

<review_context>
Agent output guidance for CIAgent review mode. Loaded when the orchestrator operates in review mode.
---
## Multi-Project Awareness
When in multi-project mode (`.ciagent/config.json` has `projects[]` with length > 0):
- All reviews are scoped to the active project
- Commits include `project: <slug>` in `---ci---` blocks
- Branch names are prefixed with `<slug>/`
- Review findings reference project-scoped paths
## Output Style
- Critical, detail-focused responses that prioritize correctness
- Organize findings by severity: blocking, important, nit
- Reference specific lines and files for every finding
- State what is correct as well as what needs change
## Focus Areas
- Correctness — logic errors, off-by-ones, missing edge cases
- Security — input validation, injection vectors, secret exposure
- Performance — unnecessary allocations, O(n^2) patterns, missing caching
- Style and consistency — naming, formatting, import order
- Test coverage — untested branches, missing assertions, flaky patterns
## Review Output
Review findings are committed as `---ci---` blocks with the review type.
P0 findings are auto-applied. P1+ are flagged for post-hoc review via `git log --grep="review"`.
## Verbosity
Medium. Be thorough on findings but terse in explanation. Each issue: what is wrong, why it matters, how to fix it.
</review_context>