Files
acdl/.ciagent/GRILL.md
T
Jon Chery ea44fdb9d6 docs(P00): grill v1.23 — PROCEED-WITH-REVISIONS (4 binding revisions)
Adversarial red-team review of the v1.23 Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX
plan (7 phases, 5 waves). Overall verdict: PROCEED-WITH-REVISIONS (conf 0.78).

Empirically verified (P0 risks cleared):
- Image format: rendered HTML uses plain <img src="assets/png/...">, no
  xlink:href → inline_images.py regex will match (Axis 4 PASS, conf 0.95)
- Marp <div> passthrough: minimal test deck through marp-cli@4.5.0 confirms
  <div class="benefit"> passes through verbatim (Axis 6 PASS, conf 0.95)
- Versioning: no v1.22.* tags exist (Axis 10 PASS, conf 0.95)
- Test inversion list complete (Axis 3 PASS, conf 0.92)

4 binding revisions:
- G-001: Purge "penetrate" from entire repo (docs/ + .ciagent/), not just
  docs/presentations/ — term appears in docs/scope.md:16, docs/vision.md:18,
  and all .ciagent/*.md
- G-002: Serialize P3→P4 — "zero file overlap" is false for verification
  (P3 parser depends on deck P4 trims; P4 verify render depends on P3's
  render_slides.sh being stable)
- G-003: Split P3 into P3a (inline_images + render_slides.sh + pyproject —
  low-risk) and P3b (render_pptx.py + parser — high-risk, 10+ markdown
  constructs + python-pptx XML constraints)
- G-004: Merge P5+P6 — P6 is ceremonial overhead for an NFR docs milestone;
  P5 absorbs review/audit/ship. Net phases: 7 (P1, P2, P3a, P3b, P4, P5+P6)

No escalations (all axes resolved at conf >= 0.78).

---ci---
status: grill
decisions:
  - G-001: Purge "penetrate" from docs/ + .ciagent/ (conf 0.85)
  - G-002: Serialize P3->P4 (conf 0.85)
  - G-003: Split P3 into P3a + P3b (conf 0.80)
  - G-004: Merge P5+P6 (conf 0.80)
escalations: []
2026-08-12 00:02:57 +00:00

207 lines
12 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# CIAgent Grill Report
## Run: 2026-08-12 (mode: interactive, focus: all axes) — v1.23 Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX
### Overall Verdict: PROCEED-WITH-REVISIONS (confidence: 0.78)
The plan is fundamentally sound — the empirical checks (image format, Marp
`<div>` passthrough, versioning, test-inversion completeness) all pass. But
four binding revisions restructure the wave/phase plan and expand the
"penetrate" purge scope. Two axes were escalated-but-resolved (the empirical
verifications de-risked P2 and P3). The plan proceeds with the revisions
below.
---
### Per-Axis Findings
#### Axis 1 — Scope / over-reach: PASS (conf 0.80)
Building a whole new `render_pptx.py` + markdown parser is significant for a
"deck cleanup" milestone, but REQ-269 explicitly mandates it, the milestone
is NFR docs/render/test-only (no runtime impact), and the dual-PPTX value
(MARP image-of-slide + python structured/editable) is a real deliverable, not
gold-plating. The G-003 split (P3a/P3b) mitigates the parser-complexity risk.
The plan stays in scope; it does not reach into the deck's 4-beat narrative
arc (out-of-scope section confirms).
#### Axis 2 — Hidden dependencies (P3/P4 "zero file overlap"): REVISE → G-002 (conf 0.85)
The "zero file overlap" claim is true for EDITS but false for VERIFICATION.
P3's `render_pptx.py` parsing logic depends on the deck markdown structure
that P4 is simultaneously trimming; P4's verify step runs `render_slides.sh`
that P3 is mid-editing. **Binding revision G-002:** serialize P3→P4.
#### Axis 3 — Test inversion risk: PASS (conf 0.92)
The plan's test-update list (Finding 5 / P5 tasks) is complete and accurate.
Empirically confirmed all affected tests:
- `test_marp_deck_not_using_default_theme` (line 66-74: invert — we now USE
`theme: default`) ✓ plan mentions
- `test_marp_deck_uses_sp_theme` (line 55-64: rewrite to assert inline `style:`
block) ✓ plan mentions
- `test_theme_css_*` trio (lines 275, 284, 295: retarget to inline `style:`) ✓
- `test_html_embeds_theme` (line 353: `--sp-red``#D6002A`) ✓ plan mentions
- `test_source_md_*` pair (lines 240, 266: delete — plain `.md` gone) ✓
- `test_render_slides_script_renders_marp` (line 92: still produces `.pptx`
via marp-cli for the fallback PPTX) — ✓ plan handles
- No latent assertions missed. The plan's enumeration is thorough.
#### Axis 4 — Image-inlining correctness: PASS (conf 0.95)
Empirically verified the rendered HTML at
`docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html` uses plain
`<img src="assets/png/platform-pipeline.png" ...>` and
`<img src="assets/png/telemetry-live-ops.png" ...>` — standard `<img>` tags
inside Marp's SVG `<foreignObject>` wrapper. Zero `xlink:href` occurrences.
The `inline_images.py` regex (`<img\s+src="([^"]+)"`) will match. The 2
`data:image` matches already in the HTML are Marp OSC onscreen-control SVG
icons (CSS backgrounds, not slide images) — not a conflict. **P0 risk
cleared.**
#### Axis 5 — python-pptx parser complexity: REVISE → G-003 (conf 0.80)
The parser must handle 10+ distinct markdown constructs (frontmatter, `---`
separators, H1/H2, bullets, bold leads, blockquotes, fenced code, images,
markdown tables, `<div class="benefit">` HTML blocks) plus edge cases
(tables with `**bold**` R/A cells, nested bullets, `class:tall` image alt
text) plus two python-pptx constraints (no CSS font fallback — single
`font.name`; blank layout has no bullets — must inject `<a:buChar>` XML).
Finding 3 confirmed the APIs exist but the parser is non-trivial. With P3
on the serial critical path (G-002), an overflow blocks everything.
**Binding revision G-003:** split P3 into P3a (inline_images + render_slides.sh
+ pyproject — low-risk mechanical) and P3b (render_pptx.py + parser + the
attach_release_asset.py extension — high-risk).
#### Axis 6 — Benefit callout `<div>` in Marp: PASS (conf 0.95)
Empirically verified by rendering a minimal test deck through
`@marp-team/marp-cli@4.5.0` (the pinned version): `<div class="benefit">text</div>`
passes through verbatim into the rendered `<section>`. Marpit's `html: true`
option is on by default; no sanitization of styling divs. The `.benefit` class
in the inline `style:` block will apply. P2's restyle approach is valid.
**P0 risk cleared.**
#### Axis 7 — "penetrate" removal completeness: REVISE → G-001 (conf 0.85)
CRITICAL gap. The plan's verify step `grep -ri penetrat docs/presentations/`
misses `docs/scope.md` (line 16: "Nova never penetrates the PDLC") and
`docs/vision.md` (line 18: "It does not penetrate upstream product or
software development lifecycles") — the repo's two core strategic docs. The
term also appears in every `.ciagent/` file (PLAN, REQUIREMENTS, RESEARCH,
CLARIFY, ROADMAP, PROJECT, PERSONAS, NORTH_STAR). The deck does not link out
to these docs, but they are audience-reachable via the repo.
**Binding revision G-001:** purge "penetrate" (and derivatives) from the
entire repo — `docs/` AND `.ciagent/`. P4's verify step becomes
`grep -ri penetrat docs/ .ciagent/` returns nothing. `test_no_penetrate_term`
asserts the same. The deleted plain `.md` (P1) already removes its
occurrence; `docs/scope.md` + `docs/vision.md` reworded in P4; all
`.ciagent/` files reworded across the relevant phases (the phase that owns
each file's edit window).
#### Axis 8 — Wave 3 parallelization feasibility: REVISE → G-002 (conf 0.85)
Resolved by G-002 (serialize P3→P4). Wave 3 is no longer parallel. P3's
`render_slides.sh` is stable before P4 runs its verify render; P3's parser
is tested against the current (untrimmed) deck before P4 trims it.
#### Axis 9 — Phase count vs. value: REVISE → G-004 (conf 0.80)
G-003 split P3 (→8 phases); G-004 merges P5+P6 to compensate. P6
(final-review-ship) for an NFR docs-only milestone is largely ceremonial —
the review/audit/ship work folds into P5's final commits. **Binding revision
G-004:** merge P5+P6. Net phase count returns to 7.
#### Axis 10 — Versioning: PASS (conf 0.95)
`git tag --list 'v1.22.*'` returns nothing — no conflicts. The v1.21.x line
(v1.21.0..v1.21.6) is the precedent; v1.23 tags v1.22.0..v1.22.6 per the
revised phase plan (G-003 split shifts tag numbers; G-004 merge keeps the
final at v1.22.6).
---
### Binding Decisions
| ID | Decision | Confidence | Rationale |
|----|----------|-----------|----------|
| G-001 | Purge "penetrate" (and derivatives) from the entire repo — `docs/` AND `.ciagent/`, not just `docs/presentations/`. P4 verify: `grep -ri penetrat docs/ .ciagent/` returns nothing. `test_no_penetrate_term` asserts the same. `docs/scope.md:16` + `docs/vision.md:18` reworded in P4; all `.ciagent/` files reworded in the phase that owns each file's edit window. | 0.85 | The term appears in the repo's two core strategic docs (audience-reachable) and all internal metadata. REQ-272 says "removed from all presentation files"; the user confirmed a full-repo purge (politically loaded term). The plan's `docs/presentations/`-only grep is a gap. |
| G-002 | Serialize P3→P4. Wave 3 is no longer parallel. P3 completes (stable `render_slides.sh` + tested parser against the current deck) before P4 trims the deck + purges "penetrate" (per G-001). C8's parallelization rationale is overruled. | 0.85 | "Zero file overlap" is true for edits but false for verification: P3's parser depends on the deck structure P4 is trimming; P4's verify render depends on P3's `render_slides.sh` being stable. The interaction risk is the failure mode. |
| G-003 | Split P3 into P3a (inline_images.py + render_slides.sh inline-images step + pyproject.toml — low-risk mechanical) and P3b (render_pptx.py + the full markdown parser + render_slides.sh python-pptx step + attach_release_asset.py extension — high-risk). Both serial in Wave 3. | 0.80 | The parser handles 10+ markdown constructs + python-pptx XML constraints (font fallback, bullet injection); on the serial critical path (G-002) an overflow blocks everything. Splitting isolates the high-risk work. |
| G-004 | Merge P5+P6. P5 absorbs the final-review/audit/ship work (multi-persona review, reconstruction audit, milestone merge, tag, release, branch cleanup, REQUIREMENTS/ROADMAP update) as its final commits. Tag v1.22.6 = milestone release. | 0.80 | For an NFR docs-only milestone, a dedicated review/ship phase is ceremonial overhead. P5 already asserts the final state via tests. The merge compensates for the G-003 split, returning to 7 phases. |
### Escalations
None. All axes resolved at confidence ≥ 0.78. Two axes (4 and 6) were
escalation candidates (P0 risks if the empirical checks failed) but both
were cleared by direct verification — the rendered HTML uses plain `<img
src="assets/...">` (not SVG xlink:href), and Marp 4.5.0 passes through
`<div class="benefit">` verbatim (empirically confirmed with a minimal test
deck).
---
### Revised Wave/Phase Plan (post-revisions)
```
Wave 1 (P1): consolidate-docs (edits -marp.md, deletes plain .md)
Wave 2 (P2): restore-clean-style (edits -marp.md frontmatter +
↓ benefit callouts; edits render_slides.sh; retires
nova-sp-theme.css from render)
Wave 3 (P3a → P3b, serial):
P3a: inline-images (inline_images.py + render_slides.sh step + pyproject)
P3b: python-pptx-generator (render_pptx.py + parser + render_slides.sh
step + attach_release_asset.py extension)
Wave 4 (P4): trim-wordcount + purge "penetrate" (edits -marp.md +
↓ talking-points.md + docs/scope.md + docs/vision.md +
all .ciagent/ files per G-001)
Wave 5 (P5+P6 merged): ci-tests-readme + final-review-ship (tests, CI,
README, multi-persona review, audit, ship —
tag v1.22.6 = milestone release)
```
### Revised Tag Plan
- v1.22.0 (P0 — already tagged)
- v1.22.1 (P1)
- v1.22.2 (P2)
- v1.22.3 (P3a)
- v1.22.4 (P3b)
- v1.22.5 (P4)
- v1.22.6 (P5+P6 merged — final patch = milestone release)
### P4 expanded scope (per G-001)
P4 now owns, in addition to the deck word-count trim:
- `docs/scope.md:16` — reword "Nova never penetrates the PDLC"
- `docs/vision.md:18` — reword "It does not penetrate upstream product or
software development lifecycles"
- `.ciagent/PLAN.md`, `REQUIREMENTS.md`, `RESEARCH.md`, `CLARIFY.md`,
`ROADMAP.md`, `PROJECT.md`, `PERSONAS.md`, `NORTH_STAR.md` — reword every
"penetrate" occurrence (or the phase that owns each file's edit window
does so; P4 is the natural owner since it owns the "penetrate" removal
requirement REQ-272).
### P5 expanded scope (per G-004)
P5 now owns, in addition to the test/CI/README work:
- Multi-persona code review (`ciagent-review`) of the milestone branch
- Audit (`ciagent-audit`) — reconstruction test + .ciagent discipline
- Milestone ship (`ciagent-ship`) — merge to milestone branch → main, tag
v1.22.6, release with both PPTX attached, delete milestone branches
- Update REQUIREMENTS.md (mark v1.23 complete) + ROADMAP.md (mark v1.23
complete)
- Commit: `docs(milestone): complete v1.23 — Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX`
---
### Evidence Index
- Image format: `docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html`
grep — 2× `<img src="assets/png/...">`, 0× `xlink:href`
- Marp `<div>` passthrough: minimal test deck rendered through
`@marp-team/marp-cli@4.5.0``<div class="benefit">` survives verbatim
- Versioning: `git tag --list 'v1.22.*'` → empty (no conflicts)
- "penetrate" occurrences: `grep -riI penetrat` → docs/scope.md:16,
docs/vision.md:18, docs/presentations/{-marp.md, .html, .md,
-talking-points.md}, all .ciagent/*.md
- Test inversion targets: tests/test_slides_pipeline.py lines 55-64
(rewrite), 66-74 (invert), 240-270 (delete), 275-302 (retarget), 353-359
(assert #D6002A not --sp-red)
- Benefit callout count: 21 `**Benefit:**` in current deck → 21
`<div class="benefit">` in P2