eb43e08367
P5 (Wave 3, docs) — REQ-196, 197, 202, 203, 213 New deck (unified narrative): - docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform.md — source of truth (18 slides) - docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform-marp.md — Marp deck - docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform-talking-points.md — presenter cues 5-act arc: Problem -> Vision -> How -> Proof -> Roadmap x3 structure at deck level (slide 1 = arc preview, slides 2-15 = tell them, slide 16 = recap + ask) x3 per slide (opens with what it covers, delivers, closes with benefit callout) Fluid transitions (every slide references the previous slide's close) Act indicator in Marp footer Grill binding decisions applied: - G-Q4: D-122 honesty sentence on slide 7 - G-Q8: stake line (18V+0 consumers) on slide 1 - G-Q9: 4 filler benefit closes rewritten - G-Q10: slide 12 split into Zero-Touch Efficiency + Cost & ROI - G-Q11: preempt on slide 14 (deferrals are measurement infra, not autonomy) - G-Q13: Act 3->4 transition rewritten - G-Q14: slide 9 benefit reframed to trust substrate - G-Q15: ROI formula inline + N=0 caveat on slide 13 - G-Q16: slide 16 ask reframed as business decision Retired (D-130): - how-the-platform-works.md + marp + html + talking-points (DELETED) - the-developer-experience.md + marp + html + talking-points (DELETED) ---ci--- project: acdl phase: 5 milestone: v1.17 status: execute ---/ci---
113 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
113 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
# Nova — The No-Humans Infrastructure Platform: Talking Points
|
||
|
||
> Step 4 of the 4-step deck process. Presenter cues distilled from the
|
||
> source of truth (`nova-no-humans-platform.md`). 3-6 bullets per slide
|
||
> + key takeaway. Indexed by Marp slide #.
|
||
> v1.17 — REQ-196, REQ-197
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Slide 1 — Arc Preview
|
||
- Open with the stake line: "18 capabilities verified, 0 consumer estates in production"
|
||
- Preview the 5-act arc so the audience knows the structure
|
||
- Set the honesty frame: "this is an evidence deck, not a hype deck"
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** you'll leave knowing what's proven, what's pipeline-ready, and what's deferred
|
||
|
||
### Slide 2 — The No-Humans Imperative
|
||
- The operator is the bottleneck: days vs. minutes for provisioning
|
||
- Key reframing: "no-humans" = no human in normal operations; stage-gate attestation is human by design
|
||
- Cite the no-humans thesis doc
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomy in operations, human at stage gates
|
||
|
||
### Slide 3 — Nova's Vision
|
||
- Read the vision statement verbatim — it's precise
|
||
- Emphasize "provable, not promised" — the difference between marketing and defensible
|
||
- State the attestation model up front to prevent mishearing
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** invisible operations with provable trust
|
||
|
||
### Slide 4 — Strategic Objectives + Anti-Goals
|
||
- The 4 objectives are the "what"; the 5 anti-goals are the "what NOT"
|
||
- Anti-goal #3 (not removing humans from accountability) reinforces slide 3
|
||
- Anti-goal #5 (not sold to operators) explains why this deck is for leadership
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** purpose-built for infra ops, sold to leadership on outcomes
|
||
|
||
### Slide 5 — 12–18 Month Targets
|
||
- The three-section split (current / post-pilot / deferred) IS the honesty model
|
||
- "Partial" means the pipeline works but the denominator is zero (0 consumers)
|
||
- The Post-Pilot targets are committed; the numbers fill when a pilot runs
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** which numbers are real today vs. deferred honestly
|
||
|
||
### Slide 6 — The Platform Pipeline
|
||
- Walk the pipeline left-to-right: contract → resolver → adapter → plan → policy → confidence → gate → apply
|
||
- Key insight: dev is autonomous; qa/prod/dr require attestation
|
||
- The confidence signal is the "AI" — 6-input weighted score, not an LLM
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the path from intent to evidence, with humans at stage gates only
|
||
|
||
### Slide 7 — The Decision Ledger
|
||
- The D-122 honesty sentence is critical: "Nova's AI is the confidence-gated policy engine, not an LLM"
|
||
- The ledger is the moat: features can be copied, an immutable decision history cannot
|
||
- Every decision has outcome backfill from apply.completed
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomous is defensible because every decision is immutable, queryable, accountable
|
||
|
||
### Slide 8 — The 8-Concern Attestation Matrix
|
||
- The matrix is not a rubber stamp — it's structured, freshness-validated, SoD-enforced
|
||
- Offline-testable concerns run for real; operator-supplied concerns accept signed evidence
|
||
- SoD on prod: the approver can't be the same person who built it
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomy in operations, human in accountability, by design
|
||
|
||
### Slide 9 — Telemetry Architecture
|
||
- Deliberately minimal (Nova-native, no Kafka/Prometheus/ClickHouse)
|
||
- Every number in the Proof act is traceable to a file path
|
||
- The hot path is deferred (D-126) — cold store is sufficient for batch
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the architecture IS the trust substrate — "where does this number come from?" → file path
|
||
|
||
### Slide 10 — Capability Health
|
||
- 18V+4S is the single most important proof point
|
||
- The 4 Skipped are live-AWS caps — honestly skipped (D-096), not broken
|
||
- When live AWS is re-provisioned, they reactivate
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the platform works, and we're honest about what we can't test
|
||
|
||
### Slide 11 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
|
||
- Both 100% — no AI decision is ever lost; no prod/dr promotion lands without a human sign-off
|
||
- The trust snapshot has a chain-integrity verdict (the ledger hasn't been tampered with)
|
||
- D-083 (S3 Object Lock + JWS) is the next step for the ledger
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** trust is provable — not a marketing claim, a queryable record
|
||
|
||
### Slide 12 — Zero-Touch Efficiency
|
||
- The Post-Pilot caveat is the honesty model: pipeline works, denominator is zero
|
||
- This is NOT a fabricated "99% touchless" claim
|
||
- The numbers fill when a pilot runs
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the measurement works; the numbers activate with a pilot
|
||
|
||
### Slide 13 — Cost & ROI
|
||
- The ROI formula is shown inline — not hidden in a footnote
|
||
- The N=0 caveat is stated explicitly
|
||
- This is the "no fabrication" constraint in action
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the formula is ready; the production denominator activates with a pilot
|
||
|
||
### Slide 14 — What's Deferred — and Why
|
||
- The preempt is critical: deferrals are measurement infrastructure, not autonomy
|
||
- The platform IS autonomous in operations; what's deferred is the evidence pipeline
|
||
- Showing this to leadership demonstrates honesty, not weakness
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the autonomy is real; the measurement gaps are documented
|
||
|
||
### Slide 15 — Roadmap to the North Star
|
||
- Every deferred metric has a specific unblock requirement and a candidate milestone
|
||
- The re-evaluation triggers ensure the metrics layer evolves
|
||
- Nothing is hand-waved; everything has a plan
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** the path from "honestly deferred" to "here's how we get there"
|
||
|
||
### Slide 16 — Recap + Ask
|
||
- Recap the 5-act arc so the audience leaves with the structure
|
||
- The ask is a business decision: approve a pilot + the ledger build-out
|
||
- "Pipeline-ready" → "production-proven" is the value proposition
|
||
- **Key takeaway:** approve a pilot + the ledger build-out to move from pipeline-ready to production-proven
|
||
|
||
### Appendix A1 — Metrics Glossary
|
||
- Reference for every metric mentioned in the deck
|
||
- Use if the audience asks "what does X mean?"
|
||
|
||
### Appendix A2 — Operating Model & Cost
|
||
- The operating cost is negligible (~$0.007/month)
|
||
- The zero-cost steady state (D-096 teardown) is the structural mitigation
|
||
- References the pre-mortem for the decay-prevention story |