Files
acdl/docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform-talking-points.md
T
Jon Chery eb43e08367 docs(P5): deck rebuild — unified narrative deck (18 slides, x3 arc, per-slide benefits) + retire old decks (D-130)
P5 (Wave 3, docs) — REQ-196, 197, 202, 203, 213

New deck (unified narrative):
- docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform.md — source of truth (18 slides)
- docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform-marp.md — Marp deck
- docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform-talking-points.md — presenter cues

5-act arc: Problem -> Vision -> How -> Proof -> Roadmap
x3 structure at deck level (slide 1 = arc preview, slides 2-15 = tell them, slide 16 = recap + ask)
x3 per slide (opens with what it covers, delivers, closes with benefit callout)
Fluid transitions (every slide references the previous slide's close)
Act indicator in Marp footer

Grill binding decisions applied:
- G-Q4: D-122 honesty sentence on slide 7
- G-Q8: stake line (18V+0 consumers) on slide 1
- G-Q9: 4 filler benefit closes rewritten
- G-Q10: slide 12 split into Zero-Touch Efficiency + Cost & ROI
- G-Q11: preempt on slide 14 (deferrals are measurement infra, not autonomy)
- G-Q13: Act 3->4 transition rewritten
- G-Q14: slide 9 benefit reframed to trust substrate
- G-Q15: ROI formula inline + N=0 caveat on slide 13
- G-Q16: slide 16 ask reframed as business decision

Retired (D-130):
- how-the-platform-works.md + marp + html + talking-points (DELETED)
- the-developer-experience.md + marp + html + talking-points (DELETED)

---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 5
milestone: v1.17
status: execute
---/ci---
2026-08-04 20:06:47 +00:00

113 lines
5.9 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Nova — The No-Humans Infrastructure Platform: Talking Points
> Step 4 of the 4-step deck process. Presenter cues distilled from the
> source of truth (`nova-no-humans-platform.md`). 3-6 bullets per slide
> + key takeaway. Indexed by Marp slide #.
> v1.17 — REQ-196, REQ-197
---
### Slide 1 — Arc Preview
- Open with the stake line: "18 capabilities verified, 0 consumer estates in production"
- Preview the 5-act arc so the audience knows the structure
- Set the honesty frame: "this is an evidence deck, not a hype deck"
- **Key takeaway:** you'll leave knowing what's proven, what's pipeline-ready, and what's deferred
### Slide 2 — The No-Humans Imperative
- The operator is the bottleneck: days vs. minutes for provisioning
- Key reframing: "no-humans" = no human in normal operations; stage-gate attestation is human by design
- Cite the no-humans thesis doc
- **Key takeaway:** autonomy in operations, human at stage gates
### Slide 3 — Nova's Vision
- Read the vision statement verbatim — it's precise
- Emphasize "provable, not promised" — the difference between marketing and defensible
- State the attestation model up front to prevent mishearing
- **Key takeaway:** invisible operations with provable trust
### Slide 4 — Strategic Objectives + Anti-Goals
- The 4 objectives are the "what"; the 5 anti-goals are the "what NOT"
- Anti-goal #3 (not removing humans from accountability) reinforces slide 3
- Anti-goal #5 (not sold to operators) explains why this deck is for leadership
- **Key takeaway:** purpose-built for infra ops, sold to leadership on outcomes
### Slide 5 — 1218 Month Targets
- The three-section split (current / post-pilot / deferred) IS the honesty model
- "Partial" means the pipeline works but the denominator is zero (0 consumers)
- The Post-Pilot targets are committed; the numbers fill when a pilot runs
- **Key takeaway:** which numbers are real today vs. deferred honestly
### Slide 6 — The Platform Pipeline
- Walk the pipeline left-to-right: contract → resolver → adapter → plan → policy → confidence → gate → apply
- Key insight: dev is autonomous; qa/prod/dr require attestation
- The confidence signal is the "AI" — 6-input weighted score, not an LLM
- **Key takeaway:** the path from intent to evidence, with humans at stage gates only
### Slide 7 — The Decision Ledger
- The D-122 honesty sentence is critical: "Nova's AI is the confidence-gated policy engine, not an LLM"
- The ledger is the moat: features can be copied, an immutable decision history cannot
- Every decision has outcome backfill from apply.completed
- **Key takeaway:** autonomous is defensible because every decision is immutable, queryable, accountable
### Slide 8 — The 8-Concern Attestation Matrix
- The matrix is not a rubber stamp — it's structured, freshness-validated, SoD-enforced
- Offline-testable concerns run for real; operator-supplied concerns accept signed evidence
- SoD on prod: the approver can't be the same person who built it
- **Key takeaway:** autonomy in operations, human in accountability, by design
### Slide 9 — Telemetry Architecture
- Deliberately minimal (Nova-native, no Kafka/Prometheus/ClickHouse)
- Every number in the Proof act is traceable to a file path
- The hot path is deferred (D-126) — cold store is sufficient for batch
- **Key takeaway:** the architecture IS the trust substrate — "where does this number come from?" → file path
### Slide 10 — Capability Health
- 18V+4S is the single most important proof point
- The 4 Skipped are live-AWS caps — honestly skipped (D-096), not broken
- When live AWS is re-provisioned, they reactivate
- **Key takeaway:** the platform works, and we're honest about what we can't test
### Slide 11 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
- Both 100% — no AI decision is ever lost; no prod/dr promotion lands without a human sign-off
- The trust snapshot has a chain-integrity verdict (the ledger hasn't been tampered with)
- D-083 (S3 Object Lock + JWS) is the next step for the ledger
- **Key takeaway:** trust is provable — not a marketing claim, a queryable record
### Slide 12 — Zero-Touch Efficiency
- The Post-Pilot caveat is the honesty model: pipeline works, denominator is zero
- This is NOT a fabricated "99% touchless" claim
- The numbers fill when a pilot runs
- **Key takeaway:** the measurement works; the numbers activate with a pilot
### Slide 13 — Cost & ROI
- The ROI formula is shown inline — not hidden in a footnote
- The N=0 caveat is stated explicitly
- This is the "no fabrication" constraint in action
- **Key takeaway:** the formula is ready; the production denominator activates with a pilot
### Slide 14 — What's Deferred — and Why
- The preempt is critical: deferrals are measurement infrastructure, not autonomy
- The platform IS autonomous in operations; what's deferred is the evidence pipeline
- Showing this to leadership demonstrates honesty, not weakness
- **Key takeaway:** the autonomy is real; the measurement gaps are documented
### Slide 15 — Roadmap to the North Star
- Every deferred metric has a specific unblock requirement and a candidate milestone
- The re-evaluation triggers ensure the metrics layer evolves
- Nothing is hand-waved; everything has a plan
- **Key takeaway:** the path from "honestly deferred" to "here's how we get there"
### Slide 16 — Recap + Ask
- Recap the 5-act arc so the audience leaves with the structure
- The ask is a business decision: approve a pilot + the ledger build-out
- "Pipeline-ready" → "production-proven" is the value proposition
- **Key takeaway:** approve a pilot + the ledger build-out to move from pipeline-ready to production-proven
### Appendix A1 — Metrics Glossary
- Reference for every metric mentioned in the deck
- Use if the audience asks "what does X mean?"
### Appendix A2 — Operating Model & Cost
- The operating cost is negligible (~$0.007/month)
- The zero-cost steady state (D-096 teardown) is the structural mitigation
- References the pre-mortem for the decay-prevention story