Jon Chery
930c24be6d
---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 0
milestone: v1.1
status: research
research_targets: 10
top_finding:
- TARGET 1 (conf 0.95): Gitea Actions does NOT support id-token: write / OIDC.
Real OIDC deferred to v1.2 (blocked on go-gitea/gitea#36988).
Spike adopts D-039: per-run-rotated long-lived key waiver.
decisions_adopted: [D-039, D-040, D-041, D-042, D-043, D-044, D-045, D-046]
risks:
- R-1 (highest): OIDC gap -> key-rotation waiver (mitigated by D-039)
- R-2: Checkov terraform_plan edge cases (mitigated by ACDL_TAG_NAMING skipped record)
- R-3: 6 confidence inputs are a recommendation (D-040 adopted in PROJECT.md)
---/ci---
RESEARCH.md (1330 lines) authored by ci-researcher. Key findings:
- TARGET 1: Gitea Actions does NOT support emitting an OIDC id-token
(Gitea docs list id-token as unsupported; go-gitea/gitea#33681 open;
draft PR #36988 unmerged; Gitea's own CI still uses long-lived keys
per #37980). Real-AWS OIDC is unachievable in this environment for v1.1.
- TARGETS 2-10: Terraform/Checkov install steps, IR prior art, Checkov
adapter, DynamoDB outbox, 6-input confidence signal, tiered ledger
(Object Lock deferred), HITL/SoD, contract schema, archive strategy
— all resolved with concrete sketches in RESEARCH.md.
Adopted D-039..D-046 in PROJECT.md. Re-scoped Phase 08 (ROADMAP) and
REQ-23 (REQUIREMENTS) to reflect the OIDC blocker: the spike uses a
per-run-rotated long-lived key (D-039) instead of OIDC; real OIDC is a
v1.2 deliverable. ARCHITECTURE.md Gitea API surface table updated with
the OIDC verdict.
ACDL — Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform
A 30-minute executive demo proving that infrastructure can be delivered automatically, safely, and with a complete audit trail — without the usual weeks of manual tickets, reviews, and copy-pasted configuration.
The demo runs entirely on local stubs (no AWS/GCP/Azure, no external LLM APIs). It shows intent and safety behavior rather than provisioning real cloud resources.
Four acts
- Act 1 — The Friction: the old manual 2-week deployment process.
- Act 2 — Developer Self-Service: commit a valid
contract.yamlforl2-commodity-price-feed, watch Dev auto-run, QA + Prod approval gates, then the evidence timeline. - Act 3 — Citizen Developer: open a GitHub/Gitea Issue with natural-
language intent; the Python keyword parser generates the same
contract.yamland triggers the identical pipeline. - Act 4 — The Safety Net: commit a malicious
contract.yaml(public-ingress: true) forl2-regulatory-reporting; the pipeline halts in Dev because the confidence signal drops below 0.50, and the rejection is visible on the evidence stream.
Repositories
All under the continuous-intelligence Gitea org at
https://git.cloudinit.dev:
acdl(this repo) — platform + stubs + reusable workflowsacdl-contracts— developer surface (contract.yaml+ issue trigger)acdl-evidence— audit timeline (served via raw file URLs; Gitea has no native Pages — see.ciagent/ARCHITECTURE.mdGitea API Surface table)
Project metadata
See .ciagent/PROJECT.md for the full spec, .ciagent/ROADMAP.md for the
5-phase breakdown, .ciagent/REQUIREMENTS.md for traceable requirements,
and .ciagent/PERSONAS.md for the active persona roster.
Phase 01 verification
After running scripts/gitea_setup.sh (which creates acdl-contracts and
acdl-evidence in the org and pushes the placeholder index.html), run:
ACDL_GITEA_TOKEN=<token> scripts/verify_phase01.sh
The script confirms:
- both new repos exist via the Gitea API
- the raw
index.htmlURL onacdl-evidencereturns HTTP 200 - the
qaandprodbranches exist onacdl-contracts
Exit 0 = Phase 01 success criteria met.