Files
acdl/.ciagent/REVIEW.md
T
Jon Chery 2697775470 docs(milestone): complete v1.10 — pipeline regression fix + capability re-verification
v1.10 milestone COMPLETE. 4 phases (52-55) shipped + verified:
- P52: regression-class VERIFY (D-091) — catches capability decay
- P53: local emulating adapters (D-092) — full local E2E, no AWS
- P54: capability re-verification sweep (D-093) — 16/16 Verified, 7 adapter defects fixed
- P55: rewrite PROJECT/ROADMAP/decks to verified reality (D-094)

Review: READY TO SHIP (0 P0, 0 P1, 1 P2 post-hoc).
Audit: PASS (reconstruction, file discipline, branch hygiene, commit discipline).
Regression gate: 16/16 capabilities Verified (12 local + 4 live-AWS).
Tests: 513 fast + 5 slow, all pass.

Tag v1.10.0 (next minor; fix/test/docs, not a breaking schema change).

---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 0
milestone: v1.10
status: complete
requirements:
  covered: [REQ-112, REQ-113, REQ-114, REQ-115]
  partial: []
---/ci---
2026-07-27 18:29:33 +00:00

92 lines
3.7 KiB
Markdown

# ACDL v1.10 — Review
> Review date: 2026-07-27. Reviewer: ci-code-reviewer. Milestone: v1.10.
> Scope: 5 commits (772ac72..950db56), 22 files, +2281/-256 lines.
## Commits reviewed
| Commit | Phase | Type | Summary |
|--------|-------|------|---------|
| 772ac72 | 52 | docs | v1.10 milestone plan (PLAN stage) |
| 9897df0 | 52 | fix | regression-class VERIFY (D-091) |
| 217653d | 53 | feat | local emulating adapters (D-092) |
| 44d1d19 | 54 | fix | capability re-verification sweep — 7 adapter defects fixed |
| 950db56 | 55 | docs | rewrite PROJECT/ROADMAP/decks to verified reality |
## P0 issues
**0 P0.** No correctness, security, or data-loss issues found.
## P1 issues
**0 P1.** No maintainability or design issues requiring post-hoc review.
## Correctness
- The regression-class VERIFY (D-091) correctly fails closed on any
non-Verified capability. The decay-surfacing test proves the gate
catches Broken. The 16-capability registry covers both local and
live-AWS tiers.
- The 7 adapter defect fixes are each traceable to a specific
`terraform validate/plan` error they resolved. The fixes are
defensive (skip-in-generic-loop + emit-in-type-specific-block) and
do not regress the static-assets stack (verified: terraform plan
passes for both contracts).
- The local emulators (D-092) correctly emulate ECS, outbox, S3 state,
and Lambda without cloud credentials. The headline E2E runs
end-to-end against the local tier.
**PASS.**
## Security
- No AWS credentials logged. The regression module reads
`.env.secrets` and passes creds via env vars to subprocesses only.
- The local ECS emulator binds to 127.0.0.1 (loopback) only.
- The local Lambda stub patches `urllib.urlopen` to a fake response
so `report_error` does not hit the network.
- No new network calls or cloud mutations introduced (plan-only).
**PASS.**
## Performance
- The regression run completes in ~60s (16 capabilities). The slow
checks (CAP-009 pytest, CAP-010 run_ci, CAP-013/014 terraform plan)
are the bulk; acceptable for a milestone gate.
**PASS.**
## Maintainability
- `core/regression_verify.py` (532 lines) is well-structured: a
dataclass report, a registry of capability checks, a `run_regression`
entrypoint, and a `write_report` helper. Adding a new capability is a
single function + registry entry.
- `core/local_emulators.py` (489 lines) is organized as four
independent adapter classes + a `run_local_e2e` convenience function.
- The adapter defect fixes are localized (skip lists + type-specific
default blocks); no large refactors.
**PASS.**
## Adversarial
- Could the regression gate pass while cloud resources are actually
broken? No — the live-AWS checks (CAP-013..CAP-016) probe the real
AWS account. The 6 IAM-gated resources are explicitly escalated, not
silently passed.
- Could the local emulators mask a real cloud failure? No — the local
tier is additive; the live-AWS tier (CAP-013/014) runs the real
terraform plan. The emulators prove runtime behavior; the live plan
proves deployment correctness.
- Could the adapter fixes introduce a regression in a stack not tested?
Possible — the registry covers microservice + static-assets. The
uptime-kuma and RDS stacks are not in the registry. **P2
(post-hoc):** add uptime-kuma + RDS contracts to the regression
registry in a future patch.
**PASS (1 P2 flagged for post-hoc).**
## Verdict
**READY TO SHIP** — 0 P0, 0 P1, 1 P2 (post-hoc: expand regression
registry to uptime-kuma + RDS stacks). The v1.10 milestone achieves
its goal: the pipeline regression gap is fixed, the platform is fully
locally testable, every advertised capability is re-verified, and the
docs/decks match verified reality.