Files
acdl/.ciagent/PROJECT.md
T
Jon Chery 288607b3fa docs(specify): ingest docs/vision+architecture; reframe .ciagent for v1.1
---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 0
milestone: v1.1
status: specify
decisions:
  - D-034 temporary long-lived AWS key waiver (used once in Phase 08, rotated)
  - D-035 milestone v1.1 (feature), ship tag v1.2.0
  - D-036 spike picks l1-s3 + l2-static-asset
  - D-037 demo archived to demo/
  - D-038 open decisions resolved (accept recommendations + decide rest)
---/ci---

Ingest docs/vision.md (6 tenets, anti-goals, signals of success) and
docs/architecture.md v0.2 (4 layers + 6 cross-cutting concerns incl. the
substrate abstraction) as the source of truth for why/how. Reframe the
project from the v1.0 stub demo (tag v1.1.0, archived to demo/ in Phase 06)
to the real Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform.

- config.json: milestone v1.1, status specify
- PROJECT.md: vision + 4-layer/6-concern model + 11 open-decision
  resolutions (W1.A/B, W2.A, BA.A accepted; W3.D/E, BA.B-F, OpenTofu
  decided) + D-034..D-038
- ARCHITECTURE.md: target architecture (IR, confidence, ledger, HITL, SoD,
  substrate abstraction) + v1.1 spike scope (l1-s3 + l2-static-asset)
- REQUIREMENTS.md: add REQ-16..REQ-28 + traceability
- ROADMAP.md: add v1.1 Phases 06-10 (archive, arch-finalize, OIDC, IR+L1,
  L2+contract-e2e)
- PERSONAS.md: add platform-engineer + security-engineer (custom),
  retire infra-stub-engineer, update territories + verification toolchain
  (terraform validate + jsonschema)
- PLAN.md: v1.1 specify plan
2026-07-21 17:55:09 +00:00

188 lines
14 KiB
Markdown

# ACDL — Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform
## Vision / Core Value
Consumers declare intent; the platform delivers safe production
deployment through an agentic stack. The platform absorbs two frictions:
the cognitive load of getting the infrastructure right, and the
operational work of getting the change to production safely.
Source of truth for **why**: `docs/vision.md`.
Source of truth for **how**: `docs/architecture.md` + `.ciagent/ARCHITECTURE.md`.
Where the two conflict, the vision wins.
## North Star
A merged change progresses through lower environments end-to-end without a
platform engineer joining a thread, approving a ticket, or manually
triggering a stage gate. A non-technical consumer ships a production
deployment by declaring intent — without authoring a workflow, a
configuration file, or a Terraform module. Every production change is
traceable to a human attestation and an immutable evidence stream.
## Core Tenets (from `docs/vision.md`)
1. **Operations are Declared, Not Executed.** Consumers define what they
need; the platform reconciles, provisions, and progresses.
2. **The Delivery Lifecycle is a Sovereign Boundary.** The platform
governs infra and delivery; it does not penetrate upstream product/SDLC.
Integration is only through validated, published contracts.
3. **Lower Environments are Autonomous; Higher Environments are Attested.**
Dev = zero-touch agentic. QA/prod/dr = deliberate human attestation, not
rubber stamps.
4. **Safety is Computed, Not Assumed.** Every action produces a measurable,
explainable confidence signal. The signal is the platform's certified
answer to "is this safe to proceed?"
5. **Infrastructure is Consumed, Not Maintained.** Compute is abstract,
containerized, or serverless. No node/OS/bare-metal lifecycle.
6. **Two Consumer Surfaces, One Platform.** Technical developers (L3A) and
non-technical consumers (L3B) converge on the same contract schema, the
same policy envelope, and the same evidence stream.
## Domain Boundaries
- **In scope:** environment progression; cloud resource lifecycle; operational
security and observability NFRs; policy enforcement; immutable audit
lineage; confidence frameworks; two consumer surfaces (developer + agentic).
- **Out of scope:** application business logic; IDE workflows; product
backlog / sprint planning; compute requiring node-level or OS-level management.
- **Interface:** upstream systems integrate through a strict contract
boundary. The platform validates, enriches with operational standards,
and reconciles the target state.
## Objective for Milestone v1.1
Finalize the architecture to v1.0 (resolve all 11 open design decisions in
`docs/architecture.md` §13) and prove the locked commitments with one
end-to-end v1 implementation spike:
- **One L1 module** (`l1-s3`) — substrate-agnostic, IR-typed interface.
- **One L2 thin-composition** (`l2-static-asset`) — references the L1.
- **Terraform adapter** — compiles the IR to a real `terraform plan`
against AWS via OIDC (no long-lived credentials, per §12.5).
- **One contract submission** → contract→IR resolution →
`terraform plan` → PolicyCheckResult (Checkov) → confidence signal →
evidence event to the DynamoDB outbox.
The spike validates the architecture's claim that the IR-shaped commitments
do not require a polyglot mess (`docs/architecture.md` §14, step 2).
## Milestone v1.1 Phases
| Phase | Name | Goal |
|-------|------|------|
| 06 | archive-demo-and-reorient | Move the v1.0 demo (`modules/`, `scripts/`, `evidence-ui/`, `contracts/`, demo workflows) to `demo/`; establish the new repo layout (`platform/`, `schemas/`, `adapters/`, `terraform/`, `modules-ir/`); rewrite README. |
| 07 | architecture-v1-finalization | Resolve the 11 open decisions → architecture v1.0. Author IR JSON Schema, PolicyCheckResult schema, contract schema, confidence-signal spec, HITL matrix, outbox/ledger design under `schemas/` + `platform/`. |
| 08 | aws-oidc-bootstrap | One-shot use of a temporary long-lived key (waiver D-034) to create an IAM role + OIDC trust policy for the act_runner, an S3 state bucket, and a DynamoDB lock table. Rotate the key. Verify the runner assumes the role via OIDC with no long-lived secret. |
| 09 | v1-spike-ir-and-l1-and-adapter | Target Stack IR; one real L1 (`l1-s3`) with IR-typed interface; L1 registry; Terraform adapter (IR → Terraform var/output + `terraform plan`) running against AWS via OIDC. |
| 10 | v1-spike-l2-and-contract-e2e | One L2 thin-composition (`l2-static-asset`) referencing `l1-s3`; contract schema + contract→IR resolution; one end-to-end contract submission → `terraform plan` → Checkov → confidence signal → evidence event to outbox. Verify the IR commitments hold. |
Milestone COMPLETE gate: review → ship `v1.2.0` (feature milestone, next
minor per ship.md) → audit.
## Requirements
### v1.0 (Prior milestone — the demo)
Status: complete. Tag `v1.1.0`. All REQ-01..15 satisfied by the stub-driven
executive demo. See `REQUIREMENTS.md` §v1 and the prior decisions table
appendix below. The demo is **archived** to `demo/` in Phase 06.
### v1.1 (Active milestone — architecture finalization + v1 spike)
New requirements REQ-16..REQ-2x — see `REQUIREMENTS.md` §v1.1. Summary:
- **REQ-16:** Architecture finalized to v1.0 (11 open decisions resolved).
- **REQ-17:** Target Stack IR defined as JSON Schema; substrate-agnostic.
- **REQ-18:** PolicyCheckResult normalized schema defined; Checkov adapter.
- **REQ-19:** Six-input confidence signal specified with per-env thresholds
(dev 0.50 / qa 0.75 / prod 0.90 / dr 0.95) and severity→penalty mapping.
- **REQ-20:** Tiered audit ledger design (S3 Object Lock 7-yr + DynamoDB
outbox, RPO=0, JWS detached signatures, `prev_event_hash` chain).
- **REQ-21:** Full 8-concern HITL matrix + separation-of-duties design
(CODEOWNERS + DynamoDB identity-distinctness).
- **REQ-22:** Contract schema (JSON Schema draft 2020-12) with per-env
mandatory/optional inputs and `profile: agentic` marker for L3B.
- **REQ-23:** AWS OIDC bootstrap (IAM role + trust policy for act_runner);
the long-lived key is used once then rotated (waiver D-034).
- **REQ-24:** One real L1 module (`l1-s3`) with an IR-typed interface.
- **REQ-25:** One real L2 thin-composition (`l2-static-asset`) referencing
`l1-s3`.
- **REQ-26:** Terraform adapter compiles the IR to a real `terraform plan`
against AWS via OIDC; state in S3 + DynamoDB.
- **REQ-27:** One end-to-end contract submission → contract→IR resolution →
`terraform plan` → Checkov → confidence signal → evidence event to outbox.
- **REQ-28:** Spike verification proves the IR-shaped commitments hold (no
polyglot mess; the adapter is the only substrate-specific code).
## Constraints
- **Forge:** Gitea at `https://git.cloudinit.dev`, org `continuous-intelligence`.
- **CI runtime:** act_runner / Gitea Actions (reuses GitHub Actions workflow YAML).
- **Cloud:** AWS via OIDC federation. **Long-lived credentials are forbidden**
(§12.5). The v1.1 spike uses a temporary long-lived key **once** to bootstrap
OIDC (waiver D-034), then rotates it.
- **Substrate:** Terraform adapter in v1 (the only adapter). L1/L2 are
substrate-agnostic in shape; the adapter is the only substrate-specific code.
- **State:** S3 (state files) + DynamoDB (locking), single-region in v1.
- **Environments:** dev (autonomous) → qa (QA HITL) → prod (SRE HITL) → dr
(SRE HITL). **Staging does not exist** (Path A locked).
- **Compute:** abstract / containerized / serverless. No VMs, bare metal, OS
lifecycle.
- **Autonomy:** Full. Escalation hooks: deploy, delete_data, merge_to_main.
## Anti-Goals (from `docs/vision.md` §7)
- Not an upstream development platform (no product backlogs, IDE, code authorship).
- Not a general-purpose AI (autonomy is narrow, bounded by policy envelopes).
- Not a legacy infrastructure bridge (no VMs/bare metal/OS).
- Not a permissive delivery highway (no escape hatches past confidence or HITL).
- Not a mutable audit log (VCS history ≠ regulatory evidence).
## Context
- The `acdl` repo exists at the org root. `acdl-contracts` and
`acdl-evidence` exist from the v1.0 demo and continue as the developer
surface and the audit-timeline host respectively.
- `docs/vision.md` and `docs/architecture.md` (v0.2) are the upstream
vision/architecture sources, pulled from `origin/main` at the start of v1.1.
- The v1.0 demo (tag `v1.1.0`) is the reference of intent — it proved the
shape (L1/L2/contract/confidence/evidence/HITL) on stubs. v1.1 replaces the
stubs with the real platform substrate.
## Key Decisions (v1.1)
Carries forward the still-valid v1.0 decisions (see appendix). New v1.1
decisions:
| ID | Decision | Rationale | Outcome |
|----|----------|-----------|---------|
| D-034 | Temporary long-lived AWS key (waiver) used once in Phase 08 to bootstrap OIDC trust; rotated immediately after | §12.5 forbids long-lived creds; OIDC needs one bootstrapping `aws iam` call before the runner can assume a role | Spike achieves real `terraform plan` against AWS without violating the locked target after bootstrap |
| D-035 | Milestone version = `v1.1` (feature), ship tag `v1.2.0` | Real platform is a breaking reframing of the demo, but treated as the next incremental milestone per user choice; ship.md: feature milestone → next minor | Tag `v1.2.0` on milestone COMPLETE |
| D-036 | Spike picks `l1-s3` + `l2-static-asset` | Simplest real AWS resource (no IAM/network deps); smallest real `terraform plan`; proves the IR + adapter end-to-end | Spike scope fixed |
| D-037 | Demo archived to `demo/` (not deleted) | Preserves the working v1.0 demo as intent reference; new platform layout under `platform/`, `schemas/`, `adapters/`, `terraform/`, `modules-ir/` | No churn on demo code; clean separation |
| D-038 | Open decisions resolved in "accept recommendations + decide rest" mode | User-locked mode: accept architecture's stated recommendations (W1.A, W1.B, W2.A, BA.A); lead-developer decides the remaining 8 (W3.D, W3.E, BA.B, BA.C, BA.D, BA.E, BA.F, OpenTofu timing) with rationale | Architecture reaches v1.0 in Phase 07 |
### Open-decision resolutions (Phase 07 deliverable — recorded here for traceability)
| ID | Question | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| W1.A | AI-refinement trigger | **Accept recommendation.** Joint condition: N ≥ 50 consecutive changes with zero rollbacks AND no L1/L2 incident in last 6 months AND Infra & Ops unilateral override. |
| W1.B | Multi-stack edge case rule | **Accept recommendation.** Permitted only for (a) DR-region mirror, (b) time-boxed experimental stack with TTL ≤ 30d, (c) explicit Infra & Ops approval with `multiStack.justification`. |
| W2.A | Tag mutability for prod | **Accept recommendation (Path B).** Tag for dev/qa, SHA for prod. Platform CLI resolves tag→SHA for prod-bound workflows. Justified by the "Audit truth lives outside the repository" bet. |
| BA.A | Initial L3B skill catalog | **Accept recommendation.** 5 skills: web API, worker, scheduled job, static asset, basic observability bootstrap. Addition criteria: (a) reviewable for sensitive data, (b) expressible as a single contract submission, (c) documented use case. |
| W3.D | L1/L2 standard versioning | **Decided.** Semver: interface → MAJOR, behavior → MINOR, lifecycle → PATCH (same as the v1.0 demo D-rule, lifted to the real platform). Pin model: L2 contracts pin L1 by `name@semver`; the resolver picks the highest compatible. Evolution: MAJOR bumps require a new registry entry (immutable publication); old entry enters a 12-month deprecation window. |
| W3.E | Schema mandatory vs optional inputs | **Decided.** Per-env mandatory table: dev requires `stack` + `environment`; qa adds `validation.e2eSuite` + `validation.loadTest`; prod adds `runbook` + `dashboard` + `oncall`; dr adds `drDrillRef`. `inputs` map is always optional. `profile: agentic` fields (`naturalLanguageIntent`, `confidenceAtSubmission`, `agentTrace`) optional everywhere. |
| BA.B | Confidence threshold tuning | **Decided.** Starting thresholds frozen for v1. Tuning begins in v1.2: track FP/FN per environment quarterly; override authority = Infra & Ops + SRE joint sign-off; any override is itself a confidence-event in the audit stream. |
| BA.C | On-call / operational ownership | **Decided.** Platform on-call = Infra & Ops rotation. Escalation: L3A/L3B halt → platform on-call pager (Sev2); consumer-visible outage → consumer on-call (Sev1) with platform on-call support. Consumer on-call relationship is contractual, defined at onboarding (BA.E). |
| BA.D | Cost / capacity governance | **Decided.** Cloud cost owner = Infra & Ops FinOps. Per-contract consumption reported monthly. Runaway spend: hard halt at 120% of contract-declared budget envelope via the confidence signal (cost is one of the 6 inputs); override = FinOps + SRE joint sign-off. |
| BA.E | Consumer onboarding | **Decided.** Two paths: developer (L3A) — `getting-started` walks through contract schema + central pipeline template; citizen developer (L3B) — onboarding grants a scoped agent + skill catalog, no workflow authoring. Both end in a sandbox dev submission that must pass the confidence gate before the consumer is promoted. |
| BA.F | Cross-platform evolution | **Decided.** The contract schema, IR, PolicyCheckResult, confidence signal, and audit stream are portable (substrate- and forge-agnostic). Forge-specific code: workflow YAML, OIDC trust, CODEOWNERS, Environments. A second forge (e.g., GitLab) requires a forge adapter + a workflow-template translator; no change to L1/L2/IR/confidence/audit. |
| Q1.3 | OpenTofu timing | **Decided (deferred).** Not in v1 or v1.1. The substrate abstraction (§12) makes OpenTofu a future adapter, not an architecture change. Revisit when an OpenTofu adapter is requested; no version committed. |
## Appendix — Prior milestone (v1.0 demo) decisions
The v1.0 demo (tag `v1.1.0`) carried decisions D-001..D-033. They governed
the stub-driven executive demo and remain valid **for the archived demo
under `demo/`**. They are **superseded** by the v1.1 decisions above for the
real platform. Full text preserved in git history at tag `v1.1.0`.