Compare commits
10 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| b8fbd995a9 | |||
| ea44fdb9d6 | |||
| e14818875c | |||
| f496dd9c24 | |||
| 0d22b89a7b | |||
| 75e9e479db | |||
| d199204367 | |||
| 6a64b2b337 | |||
| 9274b4b87f | |||
| 25ddc894c2 |
@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"phase": 4,
|
||||
"stage": "complete",
|
||||
"milestone": "v1.22",
|
||||
"phase_role": "execution",
|
||||
"phase": 0,
|
||||
"stage": "grill",
|
||||
"milestone": "v1.23",
|
||||
"phase_role": "pre_execution",
|
||||
"attempts": 0,
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-08-11T15:00:00Z",
|
||||
"milestone_complete": false,
|
||||
"tag": "v1.21.4",
|
||||
"requirements": ["REQ-261"],
|
||||
"notes": "v1.22 P4 complete. Tag v1.21.4. 8 overflowing slides trimmed/split. Header removed from frontmatter. Slide count 18->20 main + 1 appendix. 23 slide tests pass. Proceeding to P5 (re-render + tests)."
|
||||
"updated_at": "2026-08-11T23:30:00Z",
|
||||
"project": "acdl"
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
# CLARIFY — v1.23 (auto-resolved, full autonomy)
|
||||
|
||||
8 ambiguities identified, all auto-resolved at confidence ≥ 0.6.
|
||||
No human escalation (full autonomy). All decisions logged below.
|
||||
|
||||
## C1 — Speaker notes source for HTML comments (conf 0.95)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** The plain `.md` has `> **Speaker notes:**` and
|
||||
`> **Transition:**` blocks per slide; talking points live in a separate
|
||||
file. Which content goes into the `<!-- ... -->` comments?
|
||||
**Resolution:** Extract `> **Speaker notes:**` and `> **Transition:**`
|
||||
blocks from the plain `.md` and embed each slide's as
|
||||
`<!-- Speaker notes: ... -->` before the next `---` separator. Talking
|
||||
points come from `talking-points.md` (the 3-6 bullets per slide)
|
||||
embedded as `<!-- Talking points: ... -->`. Both are Marp HTML comments
|
||||
(excluded from slide rendering; the `talking-points.md` stays as the
|
||||
standalone synced aid).
|
||||
|
||||
## C2 — python-pptx dependency placement (conf 0.9)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** `pyproject.toml` has `[project.optional-dependencies]`
|
||||
`test`. Where does `python-pptx` go?
|
||||
**Resolution:** Add a new optional-dependency group
|
||||
`slides = ["python-pptx>=0.6.23"]`. Keeps the base `dependencies`
|
||||
minimal (the render script is a docs-only concern, not a runtime
|
||||
dep). CI installs via `pip install -e .[slides]`. The `render_pptx.py`
|
||||
script imports `pptx` at module load (not a hard failure if absent —
|
||||
the script prints a clear "pip install -e .[slides]" message and exits
|
||||
1).
|
||||
|
||||
## C3 — Benefit callout markdown representation (conf 0.9)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** Marp markdown can't natively produce arbitrary `<div>`.
|
||||
How is the `.benefit` class applied?
|
||||
**Resolution:** Use Marp's HTML-in-markdown support — write benefit
|
||||
lines as `<div class="benefit">text</div>` directly in the markdown
|
||||
(Marp passes through HTML blocks). The inline `style:` block targets
|
||||
`.benefit`. The `**Benefit:**` prefix is removed.
|
||||
|
||||
## C4 — Image inlining MIME types (conf 0.95)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** What MIME types does `inline_images.py` handle?
|
||||
**Resolution:** The deck references `.png` files only (mermaid
|
||||
renders). `inline_images.py` MIME-sniffs by extension:
|
||||
`.png`→`image/png`, `.svg`→`image/svg+xml`, `.jpg/.jpeg`→`image/jpeg`,
|
||||
`.gif`→`image/gif`; fallback `application/octet-stream`. Only relative
|
||||
`src="assets/..."` paths are inlined (absolute/`http(s)://` URLs are
|
||||
left alone).
|
||||
|
||||
## C5 — render_slides.sh step ordering (conf 0.9)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** Where do the new inline-images + python-pptx steps go?
|
||||
**Resolution:** Step 1 mermaid → PNG (unchanged); Step 2 MARP → HTML +
|
||||
PPTX (drop `--theme`); Step 3 inline images into HTML; Step 4
|
||||
python-pptx → `*-python.pptx`; Step 5 stage all. The inline step runs
|
||||
only on the HTML (not the PPTX — both PPTX formats embed media in
|
||||
their zip by construction).
|
||||
|
||||
## C6 — "penetrate" absence test scope (conf 0.95)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** How is "penetrate" absence asserted?
|
||||
**Resolution:** `grep -ri penetrat docs/presentations/` returns nothing
|
||||
(covers `.md`, `-marp.md`, `talking-points.md`, `.html`; `.pptx` is
|
||||
binary so excluded). A new test `test_no_penetrate_term` asserts this.
|
||||
|
||||
## C7 — attach_release_asset.py dual-PPTX (conf 0.85)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** Does the release attach both PPTX files?
|
||||
**Resolution:** Yes — attach both `.pptx` (MARP image-of-slide) and
|
||||
`-python.pptx` (structured). Minimal change: loop over both filenames.
|
||||
The MARP PPTX remains the "primary" attachment (first); the python
|
||||
PPTX is secondary (comparison artifact).
|
||||
|
||||
## C8 — Wave ordering (conf 0.85)
|
||||
**Ambiguity:** Can P1 (consolidate) and P2 (style) parallelize?
|
||||
**Resolution:** No — both edit `-marp.md` with a serial dependency: P1
|
||||
establishes the single doc (deletes the plain `.md`, adds HTML-comment
|
||||
speaker notes); P2 edits that single doc's frontmatter + benefit
|
||||
callouts. Order: P1 → P2 → (P3 + P4 parallel: P3 edits
|
||||
`scripts/inline_images.py` + `render_pptx.py` + `render_slides.sh` +
|
||||
`pyproject`; P4 edits the deck markdown — zero file overlap) → P5 →
|
||||
P6. P3 depends on P2's render-script `--theme` drop. P4 depends on
|
||||
P1's consolidated doc.
|
||||
+176
-866
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
+169
-137
@@ -1,32 +1,174 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
project: acdl
|
||||
milestone: v1.22
|
||||
milestone: v1.23
|
||||
generated_at: 2026-08-11
|
||||
generator: lead-developer
|
||||
verification_toolchain:
|
||||
typecheck: "python3 -m py_compile tests/test_slides_pipeline.py"
|
||||
test: "pytest tests/test_slides_pipeline.py # REQ-254..262"
|
||||
build: "bash scripts/render_slides.sh nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery # HTML + PPTX"
|
||||
typecheck: "python3 -m py_compile scripts/inline_images.py scripts/render_pptx.py tests/test_slides_pipeline.py"
|
||||
test: "pytest tests/test_slides_pipeline.py # REQ-263..275"
|
||||
build: "bash scripts/render_slides.sh nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery # HTML + Marp PPTX; then python3 scripts/render_pptx.py # structured PPTX"
|
||||
note: |
|
||||
v1.22 is the Nova Deck Layout Fix — a docs-only NFR milestone. Two
|
||||
active personas: lead-developer (theme CSS + deck markdown + talking
|
||||
points + README + .ciagent metadata), backend-engineer (render scripts
|
||||
+ tests). frontend-engineer stays deactivated (decks are markdown =
|
||||
lead-developer territory, per v1.17/v1.18 precedent). No data-engineer
|
||||
(no schema/DB changes). No new personas (the work is CSS + bash +
|
||||
markdown + pytest, all within the two active personas' range).
|
||||
v1.23 is the Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX — a docs/render/test
|
||||
NFR milestone. Two active personas: lead-developer (deck markdown
|
||||
consolidation + inline Marp style CSS + README + .ciagent metadata),
|
||||
backend-engineer (Python scripts inline_images.py + render_pptx.py
|
||||
via python-pptx + render_slides.sh updates + tests + CI YAML +
|
||||
attach_release_asset.py extension). frontend-engineer stays
|
||||
deactivated (decks are markdown + Marp CSS = lead-developer
|
||||
territory, per v1.17/v1.18/v1.22 precedent). No data-engineer (no
|
||||
schema/DB changes). No new personas (the work splits cleanly into
|
||||
narrative+CSS+docs and Python+bash+tests+CI).
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# ACDL — Persona Roster (v1.22 Nova Deck Layout Fix)
|
||||
# ACDL — Persona Roster (v1.23 Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX)
|
||||
|
||||
> v1.22 roster. Two active personas + one deactivated. This is a docs-
|
||||
> only NFR milestone: the work is theme CSS, render scripts, mermaid
|
||||
> diagrams, deck markdown, and tests. frontend-engineer stays
|
||||
> deactivated (decks are markdown = lead-developer territory, per
|
||||
> v1.17/v1.18 precedent). No data-engineer (no schema/DB changes).
|
||||
> v1.23 roster. Two active personas + two deactivated. This is a
|
||||
> docs/render/test NFR milestone: the work is deck markdown
|
||||
> consolidation, Marp inline `style:` CSS (reverting from the standalone
|
||||
> `nova-sp-theme.css` to `theme: default` + inline block), two Python
|
||||
> render scripts (`inline_images.py` stdlib image inlining +
|
||||
> `render_pptx.py` structured PPTX via python-pptx), test updates, CI
|
||||
> YAML, README rewrite, and the `attach_release_asset.py` extension to
|
||||
> dual-PPTX. frontend-engineer stays deactivated (Marp CSS is a static
|
||||
> stylesheet, not a React/Next.js component system — D-148 precedent).
|
||||
> No data-engineer (no schema/DB/ORM changes).
|
||||
|
||||
## Active personas
|
||||
|
||||
### lead-developer
|
||||
- **Domain:** coordination + deck content + inline CSS
|
||||
- **Active:** true
|
||||
- **Phase-specific:** false
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** [] (no framework — owns process + narrative + Marp inline CSS + markdown + README)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["pragmatic", "battle-tested defaults", "no fabrication (NORTH_STAR honesty model)", "do not change the 4-beat arc", "do not re-introduce badges/version/internal citations", "port the reference deck's exact inline style CSS (the clean look)"]
|
||||
- **Territory:**
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md` (REQ-263..275 — deck consolidation: merge plain .md into -marp.md, trim word count, remove "penetrate")
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md` (DELETE — consolidated into -marp.md)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-talking-points.md` (sync to final slide structure)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/README.md` (rewrite 4-step → 3-step process for single-document + dual-PPTX pipeline)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/assets/nova-sp-theme.css` (RETIRE from render; keep as reference file)
|
||||
- `.ciagent/**` (PROJECT, ROADMAP, REQUIREMENTS, RESEARCH, PLAN, GRILL, PERSONAS, REVIEW, CHECKPOINT)
|
||||
- **Reason:** Owns the deck markdown consolidation (plain `.md` +
|
||||
`-marp.md` → single `-marp.md` with speaker notes as HTML comments),
|
||||
the inline `style:` CSS block (porting the reference deck's exact
|
||||
CSS — the "clean look"), the word-count trim, the "penetrate"
|
||||
removal, the talking-points sync, the README rewrite, and all
|
||||
CIAgent metadata. Is the only persona that touches `.ciagent/**` and
|
||||
the deck markdown/CSS. The inline `style:` block is a Marp
|
||||
frontmatter stylesheet, not a frontend component system (D-148
|
||||
precedent from v1.22).
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for all of P0–P-final).
|
||||
|
||||
### backend-engineer
|
||||
- **Domain:** Python render scripts + bash + tests + CI
|
||||
- **Active:** true
|
||||
- **Phase-specific:** false
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["python-pptx", "bash", "pytest", "marp-cli", "mermaid-cli", "base64/re/mimetypes (stdlib)"]
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["pin CLI versions (no @latest in workflows-src/slides.yml — currently unpinned, must fix)", "python-pptx>=0.6.23 minimum", "stdlib-only for inline_images.py (no external image lib)", "tests must catch the theme-default + inline-style regression (the gap that let v1.22's standalone-theme drift through)", "no raw curl with shell-env tokens"]
|
||||
- **Territory:**
|
||||
- `scripts/inline_images.py` (NEW — stdlib base64 image inlining into rendered HTML)
|
||||
- `scripts/render_pptx.py` (NEW — structured editable PPTX via python-pptx)
|
||||
- `scripts/render_slides.sh` (update: drop --theme nova-sp-theme.css; add inline_images.py + render_pptx.py invocations)
|
||||
- `scripts/attach_release_asset.py` (extend to accept multiple file paths: both .pptx + -python.pptx)
|
||||
- `tests/test_slides_pipeline.py` (REQ-262 successor — invert theme tests, retarget CSS tests to inline style block, delete source-md tests, update slide count)
|
||||
- `workflows-src/slides.yml` (add python-pptx install step; pin @latest → @4.5.0/@11.16.0; add -python.pptx to commit list)
|
||||
- `pyproject.toml` (add python-pptx>=0.6.23 to [project.optional-dependencies] test)
|
||||
- **Reason:** Owns the Python render scripts (`inline_images.py` is
|
||||
stdlib regex + base64; `render_pptx.py` is python-pptx — a backend
|
||||
Python library, not a frontend framework). The render_slides.sh
|
||||
updates (drop `--theme`, add the two Python script invocations) and
|
||||
the CI YAML (add python-pptx install, pin versions, add
|
||||
-python.pptx to commit list) are backend/scripting tasks. The test
|
||||
suite updates (invert the theme-default test, retarget CSS tests to
|
||||
the inline `style:` block, delete the source-md tests) are the gap
|
||||
that let v1.22's standalone-theme drift through — backend-engineer
|
||||
owns closing it. python-pptx is new to v1.23; backend-engineer's
|
||||
frameworks list gains it.
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for P2 scripts, P5 tests; light
|
||||
touch on P0/P-final).
|
||||
|
||||
## Deactivated personas
|
||||
|
||||
### frontend-engineer
|
||||
- **Active:** false
|
||||
- **Domain:** frontend
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["react", "next.js"] (inert — no territory)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["component-first", "server-components", "minimal-client-js"] (inert)
|
||||
- **Territory:** [] (no territory in v1.23)
|
||||
- **Reason:** v1.23 has no frontend; decks are markdown + Marp inline
|
||||
CSS (lead-developer territory); deactivated per PERSONAS.md
|
||||
v1.17/v1.18/v1.22 precedent. The inline `style:` block is a Marp
|
||||
frontmatter stylesheet (CSS rules in the markdown frontmatter), not
|
||||
a React/Next.js component system — it stays lead-developer
|
||||
territory. No reactivation trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
### data-engineer
|
||||
- **Active:** false
|
||||
- **Domain:** data
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** [] (inert)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** [] (inert)
|
||||
- **Territory:** [] (no territory in v1.23)
|
||||
- **Reason:** v1.23 has no schema/DB/ORM changes. The milestone is
|
||||
docs + Python scripts + bash + tests + CI only. No reactivation
|
||||
trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
## Roster decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### D-163 (0.95): Inline Marp `style:` block is lead-developer territory, not frontend-engineer
|
||||
The inline `style:` block in the Marp frontmatter is a static CSS
|
||||
stylesheet (a block of CSS rules in the markdown frontmatter, applied
|
||||
by Marp to the rendered slides), not a React/Next.js component system.
|
||||
The v1.17/v1.18/v1.22 precedent (decks are markdown = lead-developer
|
||||
territory; the theme CSS is a Marp stylesheet, not a frontend framework
|
||||
— D-148) extends to the inline `style:` block. frontend-engineer's
|
||||
frameworks (react, next.js) are irrelevant to Marp frontmatter CSS.
|
||||
**Decision:** inline `style:` block stays lead-developer territory.
|
||||
Confidence 0.95 — the only counter-argument is that CSS is "frontend,"
|
||||
but Marp frontmatter CSS is a static stylesheet authored in the
|
||||
markdown source, not a component system.
|
||||
|
||||
### D-164 (0.90): No new personas for v1.23
|
||||
The work is markdown + inline CSS + Python scripts + bash + tests + CI
|
||||
YAML + README. All of this is within the two active personas' range
|
||||
(lead-developer: markdown + CSS + README + metadata; backend-engineer:
|
||||
Python + bash + tests + CI). Creating a separate "slides-engineer" or
|
||||
"pptx-engineer" persona would fragment ownership of the deck markdown
|
||||
(lead) and the render scripts (backend). The python-pptx work is
|
||||
unambiguously backend (a Python library + script), even though the
|
||||
slide layout decisions within `render_pptx.py` are co-owned with lead-
|
||||
developer. **Decision:** no new personas. Confidence 0.90 — follows
|
||||
v1.22 D-149 precedent.
|
||||
|
||||
### Territory-overlap resolution (co-ownership)
|
||||
|
||||
| Path | Primary | Co-owner | Why |
|
||||
|------|---------|----------|-----|
|
||||
| `scripts/render_pptx.py` | backend-engineer (Python code + python-pptx API) | lead-developer (slide layout decisions: which image where, font sizes, bullet structure) | The script is backend (Python); the slide-by-slide layout decisions within it are design decisions that reflect lead-developer's deck ownership. `warn` enforcement — cross-territory edits logged, not blocked. |
|
||||
| `scripts/render_slides.sh` | backend-engineer (bash script) | lead-developer (the inline `style:` block content it renders) | The script is backend; the CSS it renders is lead-developer's. |
|
||||
| `tests/test_slides_pipeline.py` | backend-engineer (test code) | lead-developer (assertions reflect deck structure + inline CSS) | The test code is backend; the assertions (slide count, inline style rules, theme-default) reflect lead-developer's deck/CSS decisions. |
|
||||
| `docs/presentations/README.md` | lead-developer (process narrative) | backend-engineer (build commands + render script invocations) | The process narrative is lead; the build commands + script names are backend. |
|
||||
|
||||
## Domain priority (v1.23)
|
||||
|
||||
`lead-developer → backend-engineer`
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale: the deck markdown consolidation + inline CSS (lead) is the
|
||||
binding constraint — the render scripts (backend) can't be finalized
|
||||
until the deck structure is stable (slide count, inline style). The
|
||||
inline `style:` block must be ported + verified before the render
|
||||
pipeline (HTML + PPTX) is re-run. Backend (scripts + tests + CI)
|
||||
follows once the deck + CSS are settled. The dual-PPTX pipeline is
|
||||
wired last, once the deck renders clean with the inline style.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical rosters
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>v1.22 roster (Nova Deck Layout Fix) — superseded by v1.23</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
### Active personas (v1.22)
|
||||
|
||||
### lead-developer
|
||||
- **Domain:** coordination + deck content
|
||||
- **Active:** true
|
||||
@@ -65,61 +207,13 @@ verification_toolchain:
|
||||
backend/scripting tasks.
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for P2, P5; light touch on P0/P6).
|
||||
|
||||
## Deactivated personas
|
||||
### D-148 (v1.22): Theme CSS is lead-developer territory, not frontend-engineer
|
||||
### D-149 (v1.22): No new personas for v1.22
|
||||
|
||||
### frontend-engineer
|
||||
- **Active:** false
|
||||
- **Domain:** frontend
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["react", "next.js"] (inert — no territory)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["component-first", "server-components", "minimal-client-js"] (inert)
|
||||
- **Territory:** [] (no territory in v1.22)
|
||||
- **Reason:** v1.22 has no frontend; decks are markdown (lead-developer
|
||||
territory); deactivated per PERSONAS.md v1.17/v1.18 precedent. The
|
||||
theme CSS is a Marp stylesheet, not a React/Next.js component system
|
||||
— it stays lead-developer territory. No reactivation trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
### data-engineer
|
||||
- **Active:** false
|
||||
- **Domain:** data
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** [] (inert)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** [] (inert)
|
||||
- **Territory:** [] (no territory in v1.22)
|
||||
- **Reason:** v1.22 has no schema/DB/ORM changes. The milestone is
|
||||
docs + scripts + tests only. No reactivation trigger.
|
||||
|
||||
## Roster decisions
|
||||
|
||||
### D-148 (0.95): Theme CSS is lead-developer territory, not frontend-engineer
|
||||
The `nova-sp-theme.css` is a Marp stylesheet (CSS for a markdown-to-
|
||||
slide renderer), not a React/Next.js component system. The v1.17/v1.18
|
||||
precedent (decks are markdown = lead-developer territory) extends to
|
||||
the deck's CSS theme. frontend-engineer's frameworks (react, next.js)
|
||||
are irrelevant to Marp CSS. **Decision:** theme CSS stays lead-developer
|
||||
territory. Confidence 0.95 — the only counter-argument is that CSS is
|
||||
"frontend," but Marp CSS is a static stylesheet, not a component system.
|
||||
|
||||
### D-149 (0.9): No new personas for v1.22
|
||||
The work is CSS + bash + markdown + mermaid + pytest. All of this is
|
||||
within the two active personas' range (lead-developer: CSS + markdown +
|
||||
mermaid; backend-engineer: bash + pytest). Creating a separate "css-
|
||||
engineer" or "slides-engineer" persona would fragment ownership of the
|
||||
theme CSS + deck markdown (both lead-developer) and the render scripts
|
||||
+ tests (both backend-engineer). **Decision:** no new personas.
|
||||
Confidence 0.9.
|
||||
|
||||
### Territory-overlap resolution (co-ownership)
|
||||
|
||||
| Path | Primary | Co-owner | Why |
|
||||
|------|---------|----------|-----|
|
||||
| `docs/presentations/assets/mmd/*.mmd` | lead-developer (mermaid re-layout) | backend-engineer (re-render via render_slides.sh) | The .mmd content is lead-developer (diagram narrative); the PNG re-render is backend-engineer (script invocation). |
|
||||
| `tests/test_slides_pipeline.py` | backend-engineer (test code) | lead-developer (assertions reflect deck structure) | The test code is backend; the assertions (slide count, theme rules, aspect ratios) reflect lead-developer's deck/theme decisions. |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Historical rosters
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
|
||||
<details>
|
||||
<summary>v1.18 roster (Citizen Developer & Production-Grade Guidance) — superseded by v1.22</summary>
|
||||
<summary>v1.18 roster (Citizen Developer & Production-Grade Guidance) — superseded</summary>
|
||||
|
||||
### Active personas (v1.18)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -139,94 +233,32 @@ Confidence 0.9.
|
||||
- `docs/scope.md` (REQ-216)
|
||||
- `docs/skills.md` (REQ-222 — the index page, not the skill files themselves)
|
||||
- `docs/submission-readiness.md` (REQ-219 — citizen-developer-facing copy; co-owned with backend-engineer for the reason-code catalog)
|
||||
- **Reason:** Owns CIAgent metadata, the milestone narrative, the RACI +
|
||||
PDLC-scope statements (REQ-215/216), the deck (21 slides, S&P theme
|
||||
regression check vs P1, CAP-024), the skills index page (REQ-222), and
|
||||
the citizen-developer-facing submission-readiness doc (REQ-219). Is
|
||||
the only persona that touches `.ciagent/**` and the deck markdown.
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for all of P0–P7).
|
||||
|
||||
### backend-engineer
|
||||
- **Domain:** backend
|
||||
- **Active:** true
|
||||
- **Phase-specific:** false
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["mcp (Python SDK v2)", "pydantic", "jsonschema", "urllib"]
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["api-first", "strict-typing", "plugin-registry extensible (D-140)", "stdio now / HTTP-ready (D-135)", "no stack traces to citizen developers (REQ-218)"]
|
||||
- **Territory:**
|
||||
- `mcp/atelier/server.py` (REQ-223)
|
||||
- `mcp/atelier/plugins/**/*.py` (REQ-223 — principles.py, validation.py)
|
||||
- `mcp/atelier/vendor/**` (REQ-224 — vendored Atelier snapshot)
|
||||
- `mcp/atelier/VERSION.md` + `mcp/atelier/README.md` (REQ-224)
|
||||
- `scripts/update_atelier_vendor.sh` (REQ-224)
|
||||
- `core/submission_readiness.py` (REQ-218 — the validator, invoked as `contract_ingestor.py --check-readiness`)
|
||||
- `scripts/render_deck.sh` (REQ-228 — HTML + PPTX render)
|
||||
- `scripts/attach_release_asset.py` (REQ-228 — Gitea release asset upload)
|
||||
- `core/submission_readiness.py` (REQ-218)
|
||||
- `scripts/render_deck.sh` (REQ-228)
|
||||
- `scripts/attach_release_asset.py` (REQ-228)
|
||||
- `tests/test_atelier_mcp.py` (REQ-225)
|
||||
- `tests/test_submission_readiness.py` (REQ-220)
|
||||
- `docs/submission-readiness.md` (REQ-219 — reason-code catalog section; co-owned with lead-developer for the narrative)
|
||||
- **Reason:** Owns the MCP server (plugin-registry, stdio, vendored
|
||||
Atelier), the submission-readiness validator (extends
|
||||
`contract_ingestor.py --check-readiness`, D-133), the render/attach
|
||||
scripts (D-142 trigger), and the two new test files. The MCP
|
||||
plugin-registry (D-140) is a backend pattern — no separate
|
||||
mcp-engineer persona is created; backend-engineer owns it.
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for P1 deck-render, P3 validator,
|
||||
P5 MCP server, P6 scripts).
|
||||
|
||||
### data-engineer
|
||||
- **Domain:** data
|
||||
- **Active:** true
|
||||
- **Phase-specific:** false
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["jsonschema", "dynamodb (item shape)"]
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["schema-first", "superset-gate NOT duplicate (PROJECT.md hard constraint)", "W3.E per-env mandatory table is the source of truth"]
|
||||
- **Territory:**
|
||||
- `schemas/**` (REQ-217 — `submission-readiness.schema.json` is the new schema; existing schemas untouched)
|
||||
- `core/lambda/contract_ingestor.py` (the `--check-readiness` subcommand wiring, D-133 — the validator is in `core/submission_readiness.py` but the ingestor dispatches to it; co-owned with backend-engineer)
|
||||
- **Reason:** Owns the submission-readiness JSON Schema (REQ-217) — it
|
||||
is a schema artifact, data-engineer territory. The schema is a
|
||||
*superset gate above* `contract.schema.json`, not a duplicate (it
|
||||
references contract fields, does not redefine them). The
|
||||
per-env-mandatory table comes from W3.E (the locked decision). The
|
||||
ingestor wiring is co-owned with backend-engineer (the dispatch point
|
||||
is backend; the schema it validates against is data).
|
||||
- **Phase-specific flag:** none (active for P3 schema + ingestor wiring).
|
||||
- `schemas/**` (REQ-217)
|
||||
- `core/lambda/contract_ingestor.py` (co-owned with backend-engineer)
|
||||
|
||||
### Deactivated personas (v1.18)
|
||||
|
||||
### frontend-engineer
|
||||
- **Active:** false
|
||||
- **Domain:** frontend
|
||||
- **Frameworks:** ["react", "next.js"] (inert — no territory)
|
||||
- **Constraints:** ["component-first", "server-components", "minimal-client-js"] (inert)
|
||||
- **Territory:** [] (no territory in v1.18)
|
||||
- **Reason:** v1.18 has no frontend; decks are markdown (lead-developer
|
||||
territory); deactivated per PERSONAS.md v1.17 precedent. v1.18's
|
||||
observability stays PowerBI / external (Out of Scope: "A Nova-built
|
||||
frontend / dashboard"). The MCP server exposes tools to an AI agent,
|
||||
not a web UI. No reactivation trigger in this milestone.
|
||||
|
||||
### Roster decisions (v1.18)
|
||||
|
||||
### D-143 (0.90): Fold mcp-engineer into backend-engineer
|
||||
The MCP plugin-registry (D-140: `plugins/<name>.py register(mcp)`) is a
|
||||
backend code pattern — Python modules, type hints, stdio transport,
|
||||
urllib for the Gitea asset API. It shares nothing with the data domain
|
||||
(schemas/DynamoDB) and is not a new engineering discipline. Creating a
|
||||
separate `mcp-engineer` persona would fragment ownership of the server +
|
||||
its tests + the render/attach scripts (all backend). **Decision:** fold
|
||||
into backend-engineer. backend-engineer's `frameworks` list gains
|
||||
`mcp (Python SDK v2)`. Confidence 0.90 — the only counter-argument is
|
||||
that MCP is a distinct protocol skill, but the SDK v2 API surface
|
||||
(`@mcp.tool()` + type hints) is small and well within backend-engineer's
|
||||
range (it's the same Pydantic/FastAPI-style pattern the persona already
|
||||
knows).
|
||||
|
||||
### Territory-overlap resolution (v1.18)
|
||||
|
||||
| Path | Primary | Co-owner | Why |
|
||||
|------|---------|----------|-----|
|
||||
| `docs/submission-readiness.md` | lead-developer (narrative + examples) | backend-engineer (reason-code catalog, REQ-218 codes) | The doc is citizen-developer-facing copy (lead) but the reason-code catalog (MISSING_TAGS, ENV_MISSING_MANDATORY, AGENTIC_MISSING_INTENT, MISSING_APP_SOURCE, POLICY_PRECONDITION_MISSING) is backend (it mirrors the validator's return codes). |
|
||||
| `core/lambda/contract_ingestor.py` | backend-engineer (dispatch wiring) | data-engineer (the schema it validates against) | D-133 places the `--check-readiness` subcommand on the ingestor (backend dispatch), but the readiness schema it loads is data-engineer territory. |
|
||||
| `schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json` | data-engineer (schema artifact) | backend-engineer (the validator must match it) | The schema is data-engineer's; the validator (REQ-218) is backend-engineer's and must stay in sync with it. |
|
||||
### D-143 (v1.18): Fold mcp-engineer into backend-engineer
|
||||
|
||||
</details>
|
||||
+410
-1389
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1532,3 +1532,48 @@ New requirements REQ-254..REQ-262 — see `REQUIREMENTS.md` §v1.22. Summary:
|
||||
A1) + remove redundant `header:` from frontmatter.
|
||||
- **REQ-262:** Re-render HTML + PPTX + add layout/aspect-ratio/theme-
|
||||
structural tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.23 — Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX
|
||||
|
||||
> **Active milestone.** NFR (docs/render/test only; no features).
|
||||
> Branch: `milestone/v1.23-deck-cleanup-python-pptx`. Tags run on the
|
||||
> **v1.22.x** patch line: `v1.22.0` (P0) → `v1.22.1..v1.22.5` (P1–P5) →
|
||||
> `v1.22.6` (P6 final = milestone release).
|
||||
|
||||
Driven by user feedback that the deck looked "out of whack" and the
|
||||
desire to return to the clean, well-formatted style of the old
|
||||
`the-developer-experience.html`. Investigation revealed the "clean"
|
||||
reference was itself MARP output (using Marp's built-in `default` theme
|
||||
+ an inline `style:` block); the current deck's standalone
|
||||
`nova-sp-theme.css` re-derives all base spacing from scratch and had a
|
||||
zero-padding bug (fixed in v1.22, but the standalone approach is
|
||||
fragile). The milestone delivers:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Single-document consolidation** — `*-marp.md` becomes the sole
|
||||
source of truth; the plain `.md` is deleted; speaker notes + talking
|
||||
points are embedded as Marp HTML comments.
|
||||
- **Clean style restoration** — revert to `theme: default` + inline
|
||||
`style:` block (S&P palette); `nova-sp-theme.css` retained as a
|
||||
reference, retired from render.
|
||||
- **Self-contained HTML** — base64-inline all images for
|
||||
redistribution.
|
||||
- **Parallel python-pptx generator** — structured, editable, S&P-themed
|
||||
PPTX alongside the MARP image-of-slide PPTX.
|
||||
- **Targeted word-count trim** + "penetrate" term removal.
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase count:** 7 (P0 pre-execution + 5 execution + 1 final).
|
||||
|
||||
**Hard constraints:**
|
||||
- DO NOT change the deck narrative or the 4-beat arc (Problem → Solution
|
||||
→ Proof → Roadmap + Ask) — only trim word count.
|
||||
- DO NOT re-introduce badges, version strings, or internal citations.
|
||||
- DO NOT remove MARP — it stays for HTML + PPTX; python-pptx runs in
|
||||
parallel.
|
||||
- `nova-sp-theme.css` is retained (not deleted) as a styling reference.
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
New requirements REQ-263..REQ-275 — see `REQUIREMENTS.md` §v1.23.
|
||||
Summary: consolidation (REQ-263,264), style restoration (REQ-265,266,267),
|
||||
image inlining (REQ-268), python-pptx generator (REQ-269,270), word-count
|
||||
trim + "penetrate" removal (REQ-271,272), CI/tests/README (REQ-273,274,275).
|
||||
|
||||
+133
-9
@@ -1895,12 +1895,136 @@ assert 20 main + 1 appendix.
|
||||
|
||||
| REQ | Phase | Status |
|
||||
|-----|-------|--------|
|
||||
| REQ-254 | P1 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-255 | P1 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-256 | P1 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-257 | P2 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-258 | P2 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-259 | P3 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-260 | P3 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-261 | P4 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-262 | P5 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-254 | P1 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-255 | P1 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-256 | P1 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-257 | P2 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-258 | P2 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-259 | P3 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-260 | P3 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-261 | P4 | complete |
|
||||
| REQ-262 | P5 | complete |
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.23 — Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX
|
||||
|
||||
> **NFR milestone** (docs/render/test only; no features). Tags run on the
|
||||
> **v1.22.x** line (milestone v1.23 → tags v1.22.0..v1.22.6). Final patch
|
||||
> `v1.22.6` = milestone release.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Consolidates the deck to a single source-of-truth markdown document,
|
||||
> restores the clean S&P visual style (Marp `default` theme + inline
|
||||
> `style:` block, matching the old `the-developer-experience.html`),
|
||||
> embeds images as base64 in the HTML for redistribution, builds a
|
||||
> parallel structured python-pptx PPTX generator, and trims verbose
|
||||
> slides. `nova-sp-theme.css` is retained as a styling reference but
|
||||
> retired from the render path.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: Consolidate Docs
|
||||
- **REQ-263:** `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md` becomes the sole
|
||||
source of truth. Speaker notes + talking points from the plain `.md`
|
||||
are folded into the deck as Marp HTML comments (`<!-- Speaker notes:
|
||||
... -->`, `<!-- Talking points: ... -->`). The plain
|
||||
`nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md` is deleted.
|
||||
- **REQ-264:** `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-talking-points.md` is kept
|
||||
as a standalone presenter aid, synced from the deck's `<!-- Talking
|
||||
points: -->` comments. Header note documents the mirror relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: Restore Clean Style
|
||||
- **REQ-265:** Revert deck frontmatter `theme: nova-sp` → `theme:
|
||||
default` and add an inline `style:` block porting the S&P visual
|
||||
language (palette #D6002A/#1B1B1B, Akkurat Pro font, black title slide
|
||||
with red top border, tables, blockquotes, code, aspect-ratio-aware
|
||||
images). Keep current structure (H2 + bold-lead, no header, no badges).
|
||||
- **REQ-266:** `nova-sp-theme.css` is retained as a styling reference
|
||||
(header comment documents its retired status). `render_slides.sh`
|
||||
drops the `--theme "$THEME_CSS"` argument; the inline `style:` block in
|
||||
frontmatter is the sole styling source at render time.
|
||||
- **REQ-267:** Benefit callouts on every slide are restyled: the
|
||||
`**Benefit:**` prefix is removed; the callout becomes a styled
|
||||
element (red top-rule + black italic text; white on title slides)
|
||||
using a `.benefit` class in the inline style block.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: Inline Images
|
||||
- **REQ-268:** New `scripts/inline_images.py` (stdlib only: `base64`,
|
||||
`re`, `mimetypes`) post-processes the rendered HTML: finds all
|
||||
`<img src="assets/...">` relative paths, replaces each `src` with a
|
||||
`data:image/<mime>;base64,...` URI. HTML becomes self-contained
|
||||
(redistributable without the `assets/` folder). `render_slides.sh`
|
||||
invokes it after the MARP HTML render, before staging.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: Python PPTX Generator
|
||||
- **REQ-269:** New `scripts/render_pptx.py` parses the consolidated
|
||||
`*-marp.md` and produces a structured, editable, S&P-themed PPTX
|
||||
(`nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-python.pptx`) using `python-pptx`.
|
||||
16:9 slides; title slide (black bg, red top bar, white H1); content
|
||||
slides (red H2 title, bold lead, bullets, blockquote, embedded PNGs,
|
||||
native PPTX tables, benefit callouts). HTML-comment speaker
|
||||
notes/talking points are skipped. `python-pptx` added to
|
||||
`pyproject.toml`. `render_slides.sh` invokes it as a new step.
|
||||
- **REQ-270:** Both PPTX outputs (MARP image-of-slide + python
|
||||
structured) are produced by `render_slides.sh` and staged. CI
|
||||
workflows install `python-pptx` and commit both. `attach_release_asset.py`
|
||||
attaches both to the release.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: Trim Word Count
|
||||
- **REQ-271:** Targeted word-count trim on ~8 verbose slides (1, 5, 7,
|
||||
8, 13, 14, 20, plus the appendix) — ~20-30% reduction on trimmed
|
||||
slides. Tables and short slides are untouched. The spirit of each
|
||||
slide is preserved.
|
||||
- **REQ-272:** The term "penetrate" (and derivatives) is removed from
|
||||
all presentation files. Slide 5's "Nova never penetrates it" phrase is
|
||||
removed with no replacement (slide 4 Anti-Goals already excludes the
|
||||
PDLC from scope). `grep -ri penetrat docs/presentations/` returns
|
||||
nothing.
|
||||
|
||||
### Category: CI, Tests, README
|
||||
- **REQ-273:** CI workflows (`workflows-src/slides.yml` + synced
|
||||
`.github`/`.gitea` copies) install `python-pptx`, run `render_slides.sh`
|
||||
(which produces HTML + both PPTX + inlined images), and commit all
|
||||
rendered artifacts. README documents the new pipeline.
|
||||
- **REQ-274:** `tests/test_slides_pipeline.py` is updated for the
|
||||
consolidated doc (no plain `.md`), default theme + inline style
|
||||
assertions (S&P visual properties, not theme filename),
|
||||
`nova-sp-theme.css` retained-as-reference assertion, image-inlining
|
||||
assertions (zero `src="assets/` references, ≥1 base64 per image),
|
||||
python-pptx output existence, benefit callout class, "penetrate"
|
||||
absence. New `tests/test_pptx_generator.py` asserts slide count, title
|
||||
colors, table rendering, image embedding.
|
||||
- **REQ-275:** `docs/presentations/README.md` is rewritten to document
|
||||
the single-document process (author `*-marp.md` → render HTML + both
|
||||
PPTX → talking points mirrored), inline `style:` approach,
|
||||
`nova-sp-theme.css` reference status, image inlining, and dual PPTX
|
||||
output.
|
||||
|
||||
### Out of Scope (v1.23)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Deck narrative / 4-beat arc changes** — the Problem → Solution →
|
||||
Proof → Roadmap + Ask structure is unchanged; only word count is
|
||||
trimmed.
|
||||
- **Re-introduction of badges, version strings, or internal citations**
|
||||
— v1.21 removed these; v1.23 does not re-add them.
|
||||
- **Removal of MARP** — MARP stays for HTML + PPTX; python-pptx runs in
|
||||
parallel for comparison.
|
||||
- **Removal of orphaned `developer-experience-*` assets** — deferred to
|
||||
a future cleanup phase (optional in v1.23 Phase 6 only if time
|
||||
permits).
|
||||
- **Mermaid render scoping** — the mermaid render step continues to
|
||||
render all `.mmd` files; scoping to referenced-only is deferred.
|
||||
|
||||
### v1.23 Traceability
|
||||
|
||||
| REQ | Phase | Status |
|
||||
|-----|-------|--------|
|
||||
| REQ-263 | P1 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-264 | P1 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-265 | P2 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-266 | P2 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-267 | P2 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-268 | P3a | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-269 | P3b | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-270 | P3b | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-271 | P4 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-272 | P4 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-273 | P5 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-274 | P5 | pending |
|
||||
| REQ-275 | P5 | pending |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2568,3 +2568,705 @@ All 5 CLARIFY decisions are grounded in these findings:
|
||||
- Re-layout to LR (FINDING 3 — TB produced 0.63 aspect)
|
||||
- Delete render_deck.sh (FINDING 5 — stale, unthemed)
|
||||
- Split slides 3+8 (FINDING 2 — densest overflow)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.23 RESEARCH — Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX
|
||||
|
||||
> Phase: 0 RESEARCH. Milestone v1.23 (Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX).
|
||||
> docs/render/test NFR milestone. Surface: deck markdown, Marp inline
|
||||
> style CSS, Python render scripts, tests, CI YAML, README.
|
||||
> Researcher: ci-researcher. Sources: ACDL codebase (v1.22 tree) +
|
||||
> the deleted clean reference HTML at /root/gl/acdl/docs/presentations/
|
||||
> the-developer-experience.html + python-pptx docs + Marp rendered HTML
|
||||
> inspection.
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 1 — Marp `default` theme + inline `style:` block (the clean reference)
|
||||
|
||||
The deleted clean reference deck
|
||||
`/root/gl/acdl/docs/presentations/the-developer-experience.html`
|
||||
(commit eb43e08) used `theme: default` + an inline `style:` block in the
|
||||
Marp frontmatter. The exact inline CSS (extracted from the `data-style`
|
||||
attribute repeated on every `<section>` in the rendered HTML) is:
|
||||
|
||||
```css
|
||||
section {
|
||||
font-family: "Akkurat Pro", "Helvetica Neue", "Arial", sans-serif;
|
||||
font-size: 26px;
|
||||
color: #1B1B1B;
|
||||
}
|
||||
h1 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 40px; margin-bottom: 0.3em; }
|
||||
h2 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 32px; margin-bottom: 0.2em; }
|
||||
section.title { background: #1B1B1B; color: #fff; border-top: 8px solid #D6002A; }
|
||||
section.title h1 { color: #fff; }
|
||||
table { font-size: 22px; width: 100%; }
|
||||
th { background: #F0F0F0; }
|
||||
blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #D6002A; color: #2E2E2E; font-size: 24px; }
|
||||
pre { font-size: 16px; line-height: 1.3; }
|
||||
code { font-size: 16px; }
|
||||
img { display: block; margin: 0 auto; max-height: 280px; }
|
||||
.badge {
|
||||
display: inline-block; padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 4px;
|
||||
font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600;
|
||||
}
|
||||
.planned { background: #fef3c7; color: #78350f; }
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**What Marp's built-in `default` theme provides for free** (from the
|
||||
embedded `@theme default` CSS in the reference HTML):
|
||||
- `section { width:1280px; height:720px; box-sizing:border-box; overflow:hidden; position:relative }`
|
||||
— slide dimensions + box model.
|
||||
- Base section typography: `font-family: var(--fontStack-sansSerif)`
|
||||
(system sans), `font-size: 16px`, `line-height: 1.5`, `color:
|
||||
var(--fgColor-default)`, `background: var(--bgColor-default)` (white).
|
||||
**Note: default does NOT set padding** — wait, correction: the
|
||||
`default` theme's embedded CSS in this Marp version does NOT include
|
||||
an explicit `padding` on `section`; the nova-sp-theme.css comment
|
||||
claiming `padding: 56px 64px` was for a different Marp version. The
|
||||
inline `style:` block above does not set padding either, implying the
|
||||
default theme's inheriting UA stylesheet padding or Marp's container
|
||||
provides it. **This is the key thing to verify in P2:** whether
|
||||
`theme: default` + the inline `style:` block produces padding that
|
||||
reserves header/footer chrome space. The v1.22 root-cause was ZERO
|
||||
padding with the standalone theme; the inline `style:` block above
|
||||
also does not set padding, so the clean look may have relied on the
|
||||
default theme's own padding (which Marp's default theme CSS
|
||||
*does* set: `section{padding:56px 64px}` is in the default theme's
|
||||
canonical CSS even if not visible in this rendered HTML's inlined
|
||||
subset — the rendered HTML strips the theme CSS into a `<style>` block
|
||||
at the top that we did not fully inspect). **Recommendation:** the
|
||||
inline `style:` block for v1.23 SHOULD explicitly set section padding
|
||||
(`padding: 48px 56px 40px` as v1.22 settled on) to be safe, OR verify
|
||||
the default theme provides it. The reference deck's clean look
|
||||
suggests the default theme's padding was adequate.
|
||||
- Pagination: `section::after { content: attr(data-marpit-pagination);
|
||||
bottom:0; right:0; padding:inherit }` — page numbers via CSS pseudo-
|
||||
element on `section[data-marpit-pagination]`. Free with `paginate:
|
||||
true`.
|
||||
- Header/footer chrome: `default` theme renders `header`/`footer`
|
||||
elements from frontmatter `header:`/`footer:` directives. The inline
|
||||
`style:` block does NOT suppress them on title slides (the reference
|
||||
deck's title slide has `<header>The Developer Experience</header>` +
|
||||
`<footer>Internal</footer>` visible). v1.22's `section.title header,
|
||||
section.title footer { display: none }` rule should be ported into the
|
||||
v1.23 inline `style:` block to keep title slides clean.
|
||||
- H1/H2 base sizing: `:is(h1, marp-h1){font-size:2em;margin-block:0.67em}`
|
||||
— the inline `style:` block overrides these with explicit px sizes.
|
||||
- Font-family: the default theme uses GitHub's `--fontStack-sansSerif`
|
||||
(system fonts); the inline `style:` overrides to Akkurat Pro stack.
|
||||
|
||||
**What the inline `style:` block must override** (not inherited from
|
||||
default): font-family (Akkurat Pro stack), font-size (26px vs 16px),
|
||||
font-color (#1B1B1B), H1/H2 colors (#D6002A), title-slide background
|
||||
(#1B1B1B + 8px red top border), table styling, blockquote styling,
|
||||
image max-height. **What it inherits for free:** slide dimensions
|
||||
(1280×720), pagination, header/footer rendering, base box model.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (the CSS is read verbatim from the rendered
|
||||
`data-style` attribute on every `<section>`; the default theme
|
||||
inheritance is confirmed by the `data-theme="default"` attribute on
|
||||
every section).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 2 — Marp HTML-in-markdown passthrough
|
||||
|
||||
Marp (via Marpit, the underlying markdown-it-based engine) **passes
|
||||
through raw HTML blocks** in markdown slides. Confirmed by the
|
||||
reference deck:
|
||||
`/root/gl/acdl/docs/presentations/the-developer-experience-marp.md`
|
||||
contains inline HTML like
|
||||
`<span class="badge planned">Planned</span>` inside slide bodies, and
|
||||
the rendered HTML (`the-developer-experience.html`) contains the
|
||||
verbatim `<span class="badge planned">Planned</span>` inside the
|
||||
`<section>` elements. The `.badge` and `.planned` classes are styled
|
||||
by the inline `style:` block (Finding 1).
|
||||
|
||||
**Gotchas confirmed:**
|
||||
- HTML blocks render correctly inside `## Slide N — Title` H2 slides
|
||||
(the reference deck's slide 5 has `<span class="badge planned">` in a
|
||||
table cell; slide 7 has it in a bullet list item).
|
||||
- HTML does NOT interfere with pagination (the `data-marpit-pagination`
|
||||
attribute is present on every paginated section regardless of HTML
|
||||
content).
|
||||
- HTML inline elements (`<span>`, `<div>`, `<strong>`) render; block
|
||||
elements (`<div class="benefit">text</div>`) also render — Marpit's
|
||||
markdown-it `html: true` option is on by default.
|
||||
- **Caveat:** Marp does NOT sanitize HTML by default (no DOMPurify);
|
||||
raw `<script>` would pass through too. For our use case (styling
|
||||
divs/spans) this is fine.
|
||||
- The current nova deck markdown does NOT use any `<div>` HTML blocks
|
||||
(`grep -c "<div" nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md` = 0 in the
|
||||
slide body; only the bespoke-marp-osc div in the rendered HTML
|
||||
chrome). So the v1.23 plan to add `.benefit` class divs is a NEW
|
||||
pattern — it will work, but is untested in this repo's deck.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (confirmed by direct inspection of the reference
|
||||
deck's source + rendered HTML; Marpit's html passthrough is documented
|
||||
behavior).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 3 — python-pptx capabilities for the structured PPTX
|
||||
|
||||
python-pptx (the `python-pptx` PyPI package) supports all capabilities
|
||||
required for `scripts/render_pptx.py`. API calls confirmed against the
|
||||
python-pptx documentation (v1.0.2 latest; v0.6.23 is the established
|
||||
minimum):
|
||||
|
||||
(a) **16:9 slide dimensions:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from pptx import Presentation
|
||||
from pptx.util import Inches, Pt
|
||||
prs = Presentation()
|
||||
prs.slide_width = Inches(13.333) # 16:9 widescreen
|
||||
prs.slide_height = Inches(7.5)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
(b) **Slide background color (black for title slide):**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from pptx.dml.color import RGBColor
|
||||
slide = prs.slides.add_slide(prs.slide_layouts[6]) # blank layout
|
||||
bg = slide.background
|
||||
bg.fill.solid()
|
||||
bg.fill.fore_color.rgb = RGBColor(0x1B, 0x1B, 0x1B) # sp-black
|
||||
```
|
||||
(Note: `slide.background` is available since python-pptx 0.6.19+.)
|
||||
|
||||
(c) **Colored rectangle as top border bar:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from pptx.enum.shapes import MSO_SHAPE
|
||||
from pptx.util import Inches
|
||||
shape = slide.shapes.add_shape(
|
||||
MSO_SHAPE.RECTANGLE,
|
||||
Inches(0), Inches(0), # left, top
|
||||
Inches(13.333), Inches(0.08) # width, height (8px ≈ 0.08in at 96dpi)
|
||||
)
|
||||
shape.fill.solid()
|
||||
shape.fill.fore_color.rgb = RGBColor(0xD6, 0x00, 0x2A) # sp-red
|
||||
shape.line.fill.background() # no border on the rectangle
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
(d) **Text frames with font family/color/size (Akkurat Pro → Helvetica
|
||||
Neue → Arial fallback):**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from pptx.util import Pt
|
||||
txBox = slide.shapes.add_textbox(Inches(0.5), Inches(0.5), Inches(12), Inches(1))
|
||||
tf = txBox.text_frame
|
||||
p = tf.paragraphs[0]
|
||||
run = p.add_run()
|
||||
run.text = "Slide title"
|
||||
run.font.name = "Akkurat Pro"
|
||||
run.font.size = Pt(40)
|
||||
run.font.bold = True
|
||||
run.font.color.rgb = RGBColor(0xD6, 0x00, 0x2A)
|
||||
# Font fallback: python-pptx sets a single font.name; PowerPoint's own
|
||||
# font substitution handles the fallback chain. To set a fallback
|
||||
# explicitly, set the font's `<a:latin>` + `<a:ea>` + `<a:cs>` typeface
|
||||
# attributes, OR rely on PowerPoint rendering "Akkurat Pro" → missing →
|
||||
# substitutes Helvetica Neue / Arial per the OS font substitution table.
|
||||
# The simplest approach: set name="Akkurat Pro"; PowerPoint does the
|
||||
# fallback. For an explicit fallback, manipulate the XML:
|
||||
from pptx.oxml.ns import qn
|
||||
rPr = run._r.get_or_add_rPr()
|
||||
latin = rPr.find(qn('a:latin'))
|
||||
if latin is None:
|
||||
latin = rPr.makeelement(qn('a:latin'), {})
|
||||
rPr.append(latin)
|
||||
latin.set('typeface', 'Akkurat Pro')
|
||||
# (PowerPoint reads only the first typeface; fallback is OS-level.)
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Key constraint:** python-pptx does NOT support a CSS-style font
|
||||
fallback stack. Setting `run.font.name` sets one typeface; PowerPoint's
|
||||
font substitution handles the fallback when the font is missing. This
|
||||
is adequate for our use case (Akkurat Pro is the named font; on
|
||||
systems without it, PowerPoint substitutes Helvetica/Arial).
|
||||
|
||||
(e) **Bullet lists:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
tf = txBox.text_frame
|
||||
for i, item in enumerate(bullets):
|
||||
p = tf.paragraphs[0] if i == 0 else tf.add_paragraph()
|
||||
p.text = item
|
||||
p.level = 0 # bullet level (0 = top)
|
||||
# Bullet character: python-pptx does not expose a high-level bullet
|
||||
# API; the default paragraph style from the layout provides bullets.
|
||||
# For explicit bullet control, manipulate the XML <a:buChar> or
|
||||
# set p.font + use the layout's list style.
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Constraint:** python-pptx has limited high-level bullet support; the
|
||||
`paragraph` level controls indentation but the bullet glyph comes from
|
||||
the layout's list style. For a blank layout (layout 6), paragraphs
|
||||
have NO bullet by default — you must add `<a:buChar>` to the paragraph
|
||||
properties XML, or use a layout that has bullets. **Recommendation:**
|
||||
use `slide_layouts[1]` (Title and Content) for bullet slides, which
|
||||
provides bullets natively; or inject `<a:buChar char="•"/>` via XML.
|
||||
|
||||
(f) **Native tables (`add_table`):**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from pptx.util import Inches
|
||||
rows, cols = len(data), len(headers)
|
||||
table = slide.shapes.add_table(rows, cols, Inches(0.5), Inches(1.5),
|
||||
Inches(12), Inches(4)).table
|
||||
# Headers
|
||||
for c, h in enumerate(headers):
|
||||
table.cell(0, c).text = h
|
||||
# style header cell
|
||||
cell = table.cell(0, c)
|
||||
cell.fill.solid()
|
||||
cell.fill.fore_color.rgb = RGBColor(0xF0, 0xF0, 0xF0)
|
||||
# Body
|
||||
for r, row in enumerate(data, start=1):
|
||||
for c, val in enumerate(row):
|
||||
table.cell(r, c).text = str(val)
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Confirmed:** `add_table` is fully supported since 0.6.19; returns a
|
||||
`Table` object with `.cell(r,c).text` + `.fill`.
|
||||
|
||||
(g) **Embedding images (`add_picture`, auto-embeds in ppt/media/):**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
slide.shapes.add_picture(
|
||||
"docs/presentations/assets/png/platform-pipeline.png",
|
||||
Inches(1), Inches(1),
|
||||
width=Inches(11), height=Inches(5)
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
**Confirmed:** python-pptx auto-embeds the image binary into the
|
||||
`ppt/media/` directory inside the .pptx zip; the slide XML references
|
||||
it via a relationship ID. This is native — no manual zip manipulation
|
||||
needed. The image is copied once; multiple slides referencing the
|
||||
same image share the media file.
|
||||
|
||||
(h) **Italic text:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
run.font.italic = True # supported since 0.6.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Version constraint:** `python-pptx>=0.6.23` is the right minimum
|
||||
(stable release with `slide.background`, `add_table`, `add_picture`
|
||||
all mature). The latest is 1.0.2 (2024); 0.6.23 (2021) is safe. The
|
||||
`slide.background` API landed in 0.6.19; `add_table` in 0.6.19;
|
||||
`add_picture` since 0.6.0. **Recommendation:** pin
|
||||
`python-pptx>=0.6.23` in `pyproject.toml` `[project.optional-
|
||||
dependencies] test`.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.90** (API calls confirmed against python-pptx docs;
|
||||
the font fallback + bullet limitations are the residual uncertainty —
|
||||
both have XML workarounds).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 4 — Image inlining (stdlib-only `base64` + `re` + `mimetypes`)
|
||||
|
||||
The current rendered HTML
|
||||
(`docs/presentations/nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html`) embeds
|
||||
images as **plain `<img src="assets/png/...">` tags with relative
|
||||
paths** — NOT base64-inlined. Confirmed by grep: `<img
|
||||
src="assets/png/platform-pipeline.png" ...>` (slide 7), `<img
|
||||
src="assets/png/telemetry-live-ops.png" ...>` (slide 11). They are
|
||||
NOT SVG `xlink:href`; they are standard `<img>` elements inside the
|
||||
SVG `<foreignObject>` wrapper that Marp uses for slide rendering.
|
||||
|
||||
**The stdlib-only approach is sufficient:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
import base64, re, mimetypes
|
||||
html = Path("...html").read_text()
|
||||
def inline(match):
|
||||
src = match.group(1)
|
||||
if src.startswith("data:"): # already inlined
|
||||
return match.group(0)
|
||||
mime = mimetypes.guess_type(src)[0] or "image/png"
|
||||
data = base64.b64encode(Path(src).read_bytes()).decode()
|
||||
return f'<img src="data:{mime};base64,{data}"'
|
||||
# Match <img src="..."> with single or double quotes
|
||||
html = re.sub(r'<img\s+src="([^"]+)"', inline_img, html)
|
||||
html = re.sub(r"<img\s+src='([^']+)'", inline_img, html)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Edge cases confirmed:**
|
||||
- Marp's SVG-foreignObject wrapper: the `<img>` tags are INSIDE the
|
||||
`<foreignObject><section>...</section></foreignObject>` — the regex
|
||||
still matches them (they're standard HTML img tags in the HTML
|
||||
namespace). No special handling needed.
|
||||
- Quoted vs unquoted src: Marp always emits double-quoted `src="..."`;
|
||||
handle both for safety.
|
||||
- Relative vs absolute paths: Marp emits relative paths
|
||||
(`assets/png/X.png`); the script must resolve them relative to the
|
||||
HTML file's directory. `Path(html_path).parent / src`.
|
||||
- Already-inlined images (`data:` URIs): skip (the regex checks for
|
||||
`src.startswith("data:")`).
|
||||
- Marp does NOT use `xlink:href` for images in HTML output (that's
|
||||
only for SVG-only output mode); the HTML output uses standard
|
||||
`<img src>`. Confirmed by grep: 0 occurrences of `xlink:href` in
|
||||
the current HTML.
|
||||
- The `--allow-local-files` flag in `render_slides.sh` is what makes
|
||||
Marp keep the local relative paths (without it, Marp would skip
|
||||
local images in the standalone HTML).
|
||||
|
||||
**No external library needed.** stdlib `base64` + `re` + `mimetypes`
|
||||
+ `pathlib` is sufficient.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (verified by direct inspection of the current
|
||||
HTML; the regex handles all observed patterns).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 5 — Tests that need updating (`tests/test_slides_pipeline.py`)
|
||||
|
||||
Full read of `tests/test_slides_pipeline.py` (373 lines). Tests that
|
||||
assert on v1.23-affected surfaces:
|
||||
|
||||
**(a) `theme: nova-sp` / `nova-sp-theme.css` via `--theme`:**
|
||||
- **Line 55-64 `test_marp_deck_uses_sp_theme`**: asserts `"nova-sp" in
|
||||
frontmatter`. After v1.23: frontmatter should have `theme: default`;
|
||||
this test must assert `"theme: default"` instead (or assert the inline
|
||||
`style:` block is present).
|
||||
- **Line 66-74 `test_marp_deck_not_using_default_theme`**: asserts
|
||||
`"theme: default" not in frontmatter`. After v1.23: this test must
|
||||
be DELETED or INVERTED (we're reverting TO `theme: default`).
|
||||
- **Line 36-38 `test_sp_theme_css_exists`**: asserts
|
||||
`nova-sp-theme.css` is a file. After v1.23: keep (the CSS is retired
|
||||
from render but kept as a reference file).
|
||||
- **Line 41-45 `test_sp_theme_css_has_snp_colors`**: asserts the CSS
|
||||
has S&P colors. After v1.23: keep (reference file still has colors).
|
||||
- **Line 275-282 `test_theme_css_has_section_padding`**: asserts the
|
||||
CSS `section` rule has padding. After v1.23: this test targets the
|
||||
RETIRED CSS — it should be retargeted to the inline `style:` block in
|
||||
the marp deck frontmatter (assert the inline style has section
|
||||
padding).
|
||||
- **Line 284-293 `test_theme_css_suppresses_title_chrome`**: asserts
|
||||
`section.title header` + `display: none` in the CSS. After v1.23:
|
||||
retarget to the inline `style:` block.
|
||||
- **Line 295-302 `test_theme_css_has_aspect_ratio_aware_images`**:
|
||||
asserts `object-fit` + `max-width` in the CSS. After v1.23: retarget
|
||||
to the inline `style:` block (or drop if the inline style uses the
|
||||
simpler `max-height: 280px` from the reference deck).
|
||||
- **Line 353-359 `test_html_embeds_theme`**: asserts `"--sp-red"` +
|
||||
`"padding:"` in the committed HTML. After v1.23: the inline `style:`
|
||||
block uses literal `#D6002A` (not the `--sp-red` CSS variable — the
|
||||
reference deck's inline style did NOT use CSS variables). This test
|
||||
must change to assert `"#D6002A"` + `"padding:"` (or `"font-family:
|
||||
\"Akkurat Pro\""`).
|
||||
|
||||
**(b) Both `.md` and `-marp.md` existing:**
|
||||
- **Line 31 `SOURCE_MD` constant** + **Line 240-263
|
||||
`test_source_md_no_internal_citations_in_slides`** +
|
||||
**Line 266-270 `test_source_md_no_badges`**: assert the plain `.md`
|
||||
is the source of truth. After v1.23: the plain `.md` is DELETED
|
||||
(consolidated into `-marp.md`); these tests must be DELETED or
|
||||
retargeted to the consolidated `-marp.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
**(c) `marp-cli` invocation specifics:**
|
||||
- **Line 83-90 `test_render_slides_script_renders_mermaid`**: asserts
|
||||
`mermaid-cli` + `sp-theme.json` in the script. After v1.23: keep
|
||||
(mermaid render unchanged).
|
||||
- **Line 92-98 `test_render_slides_script_renders_marp`**: asserts
|
||||
`marp-cli` + `.html` + `.pptx` in the script. After v1.23: the script
|
||||
no longer passes `--theme nova-sp-theme.css`; it may still produce
|
||||
`.pptx` via marp-cli OR via the new `render_pptx.py`. This test must
|
||||
be updated to reflect the new invocation (marp-cli for HTML only;
|
||||
render_pptx.py for the structured PPTX).
|
||||
- **Line 327-332 `test_render_slides_has_2x_scale`**: asserts `-s 2`
|
||||
+ `-b transparent`. After v1.23: keep (mermaid flags unchanged).
|
||||
- **Line 335-344 `test_render_slides_pins_cli_versions`**: asserts
|
||||
`marp-cli@` + `mermaid-cli@` pinned, no `@latest`. After v1.23: keep
|
||||
for mermaid; if marp-cli is still used for HTML, keep for marp too.
|
||||
- **Line 346-351 `test_render_deck_removed`**: asserts
|
||||
`render_deck.sh` is deleted. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
|
||||
**(d) Slide count:**
|
||||
- **Line 204-218 `test_marp_deck_slide_count`**: asserts 20 main + 1
|
||||
appendix = 21 slides. After v1.23: the word-count trim may change
|
||||
the count; update to match the final count (likely stays 20+1 or
|
||||
drops to fewer if slides merge).
|
||||
- **Line 361-373 `test_html_slide_count_matches_marp`**: asserts the
|
||||
HTML `<section>` count matches the deck count. After v1.23: keep
|
||||
(recompute expected from the final deck).
|
||||
|
||||
**(e) Other affected tests:**
|
||||
- **Line 137-143 `test_readme_no_retired_decks`**: asserts README
|
||||
doesn't list old decks. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 146-150 `test_readme_no_old_deck_name`**: asserts README
|
||||
references `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery`. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 153-156 `test_old_deck_files_removed`**: asserts old
|
||||
`nova-no-humans-platform*` files are gone. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 159-162 `test_marp_deck_no_badges`**: asserts no `badge` in
|
||||
marp deck. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 165-177 `test_marp_deck_no_version_in_footer`**: asserts no
|
||||
version in frontmatter. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 179-190 `test_marp_deck_title_slide_no_version_subtitle`**:
|
||||
asserts no `v1.18` subtitle. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 193-202 `test_marp_deck_title_is_autonomous_cloud_delivery`**:
|
||||
asserts the title. After v1.23: keep (unless "penetrate" removal
|
||||
touches the title — it doesn't).
|
||||
- **Line 221-237 `test_marp_deck_no_internal_citations`**: asserts no
|
||||
D-###/REQ-###/.py paths. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 304-324 `test_png_aspect_ratios_sane`**: asserts PNG aspect
|
||||
ratios in [0.4, 4.0]. After v1.23: keep.
|
||||
- **Line 107-119 `test_slides_ci_workflow_*`**: asserts slides.yml
|
||||
exists + triggers on presentations. After v1.23: keep (update if the
|
||||
workflow changes).
|
||||
|
||||
**Summary:** ~12 tests need updating; the key inversions are
|
||||
`test_marp_deck_not_using_default_theme` (delete/invert) and the
|
||||
`test_theme_css_*` trio (retarget from the standalone CSS file to the
|
||||
inline `style:` block). The `test_source_md_*` tests must be deleted
|
||||
(plain `.md` is gone).
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (direct line-by-line read of the test file).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 6 — `scripts/attach_release_asset.py`
|
||||
|
||||
Read in full (80 lines). Current behavior:
|
||||
- CLI: `python3 scripts/attach_release_asset.py <file-path> <release-id>`
|
||||
- Resolves `NOVA_GITEA_TOKEN` (or `ACDL_GITEA_TOKEN` fallback) from
|
||||
`.env.secrets`/`.env`.
|
||||
- POSTs to `/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/{id}/assets` with
|
||||
multipart form: `name=<filename>` + `attachment=<file bytes>`.
|
||||
- Single-file upload per invocation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Change needed for v1.23:** attach BOTH `.pptx` (Marp PPTX) AND
|
||||
`-python.pptx` (python-pptx structured PPTX). Two options:
|
||||
1. Call the script twice (once per file) from the ship workflow.
|
||||
2. Extend the script to accept multiple file paths: `attach_release_asset.py
|
||||
<file1> <file2> ... <release-id>` (loop over files, same release-id).
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:** option 2 (extend to multiple files) — minimal,
|
||||
backward-compatible (if only 1 file given, same behavior). The
|
||||
release-id stays the last positional arg; all preceding args are file
|
||||
paths.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (direct read; the change is mechanical).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 7 — `workflows-src/slides.yml`
|
||||
|
||||
Read in full (31 lines). Current CI steps:
|
||||
1. `actions/checkout@v4` (fetch-depth 0).
|
||||
2. `actions/setup-node@v4` (node 20).
|
||||
3. "Install Chrome" — runs `npx --yes @marp-team/marp-cli@latest
|
||||
--version` + `npx --yes @mermaid-js/mermaid-cli --version` (NOTE:
|
||||
uses `@latest` — NOT pinned, contradicts REQ-257's pinning rule for
|
||||
`render_slides.sh`; the workflow is separate from the script).
|
||||
4. "Render slides" — `bash scripts/render_slides.sh`.
|
||||
5. "Commit rendered artifacts" — `git add docs/presentations/*.html
|
||||
docs/presentations/*.pptx docs/presentations/assets/png/*.png` +
|
||||
commit + push.
|
||||
|
||||
**Where `python-pptx` install would go:** a new step between "Install
|
||||
Chrome" and "Render slides":
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
- uses: actions/setup-python@v5
|
||||
with: { python-version: '3.11' }
|
||||
- name: Install python-pptx
|
||||
run: pip install python-pptx>=0.6.23
|
||||
```
|
||||
Then `render_slides.sh` (or a new `render_pptx.py` invocation) uses
|
||||
it. OR: `pip install -e ".[test]"` if python-pptx is added to
|
||||
`pyproject.toml [project.optional-dependencies] test`.
|
||||
|
||||
**What the commit list should include after v1.23:** the
|
||||
`git add` line must include:
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/*.html` (re-rendered HTML, with inlined images)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/*.pptx` (Marp PPTX — kept as the "fallback" PPTX)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/*-python.pptx` (NEW — the python-pptx structured
|
||||
PPTX)
|
||||
- `docs/presentations/assets/png/*.png` (re-rendered mermaid PNGs)
|
||||
|
||||
**Also:** the workflow uses `@latest` for both CLIs in the "Install
|
||||
Chrome" step — this should be pinned to match `render_slides.sh`'s
|
||||
pinned versions (`@marp-team/marp-cli@4.5.0`,
|
||||
`@mermaid-js/mermaid-cli@11.16.0`) for reproducibility.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (direct read).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 8 — `docs/presentations/README.md` current structure
|
||||
|
||||
Read in full (249 lines). Current 4-step process structure:
|
||||
- **Step 1 — Full markdown (source of truth):** `<deck-name>.md` with
|
||||
`## Slide N — Title` + `> **Speaker notes:**` blocks + mermaid code
|
||||
blocks.
|
||||
- **Step 2 — Marp deck synthesis:** `<deck-name>-marp.md` with Marp
|
||||
frontmatter (`theme: nova-sp`), no speaker notes, embedded PNGs, no
|
||||
badges.
|
||||
- **Step 3 — Render to HTML and PPTX:** `bash scripts/render_slides.sh
|
||||
<deck-name>`; HTML committed (with base64 images — NOTE: this is
|
||||
aspirational; the current HTML does NOT inline images, which is what
|
||||
`inline_images.py` will fix); PPTX committed + release-attached.
|
||||
- **Step 4 — Talking points:** `<deck-name>-talking-points.md` with
|
||||
one section per Marp slide, 3-6 bullets + key takeaway.
|
||||
|
||||
**What to rewrite for v1.23:**
|
||||
- The 4-step process becomes a **3-step process** (Step 1 plain `.md`
|
||||
is DELETED → consolidated into `-marp.md`; the source of truth IS the
|
||||
`-marp.md` with speaker notes in HTML comments, OR speaker notes are
|
||||
dropped entirely). OR: keep 4 steps but Step 1's output merges into
|
||||
Step 2 (the `-marp.md` becomes the source of truth, with speaker
|
||||
notes preserved as HTML comments that Marp strips from rendering).
|
||||
- Step 2 frontmatter: `theme: default` + inline `style:` block (not
|
||||
`theme: nova-sp`).
|
||||
- Step 3: HTML rendered by Marp (`render_slides.sh`), images inlined
|
||||
by `scripts/inline_images.py` (NEW), PPTX rendered by BOTH marp-cli
|
||||
(fallback `.pptx`) AND `scripts/render_pptx.py` (structured
|
||||
`-python.pptx`).
|
||||
- The directory layout block (line 108-123) must drop the plain `.md`
|
||||
row + add `inline_images.py` + `render_pptx.py` rows + the
|
||||
`-python.pptx` row + note `nova-sp-theme.css` is retired (reference
|
||||
only).
|
||||
- The "Current decks" table (line 237-239) must list both PPTX files.
|
||||
- The slide-count convention (line 128-136) must reflect the final
|
||||
v1.23 count (after word-count trim + "penetrate" removal).
|
||||
- The "Adding a new presentation" section (line 209-233) must be
|
||||
rewritten for the single-document + dual-PPTX pipeline.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.95** (direct read).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 9 — Persona assessment for v1.23
|
||||
|
||||
The v1.23 scope: deck markdown editing (consolidate `.md` + `-marp.md`,
|
||||
trim word count, remove "penetrate"), Marp inline `style:` CSS, Python
|
||||
scripts (`inline_images.py` + `render_pptx.py`), tests, CI YAML
|
||||
(`slides.yml`), README. The v1.22 roster had lead-developer +
|
||||
backend-engineer active; frontend + data deactivated.
|
||||
|
||||
**Assessment:** the same roster applies, with one territory shift.
|
||||
- **lead-developer** (active): owns the deck markdown (consolidation,
|
||||
word-count trim, "penetrate" removal), the inline `style:` CSS block
|
||||
(porting the reference deck's CSS), the README rewrite, and all
|
||||
`.ciagent/**` metadata. The inline CSS is a Marp stylesheet block, not
|
||||
a React/Next.js system — stays lead-developer (D-148 precedent from
|
||||
v1.22).
|
||||
- **backend-engineer** (active): owns the Python scripts
|
||||
(`inline_images.py`, `render_pptx.py` — python-pptx is a backend
|
||||
library), the `render_slides.sh` updates, the tests, the CI YAML,
|
||||
and the `attach_release_asset.py` extension. This is a shift from
|
||||
v1.22 (where backend owned bash + pytest); v1.23 adds Python to
|
||||
backend's territory.
|
||||
- **frontend-engineer** (deactivated): no React/Next.js. The inline
|
||||
CSS is a Marp stylesheet, not frontend. Stays deactivated (D-148
|
||||
precedent).
|
||||
- **data-engineer** (deactivated): no schema/DB/ORM. Stays deactivated.
|
||||
|
||||
**Custom "docs/deck" persona?** Not warranted. The work splits cleanly
|
||||
into lead-developer (narrative + CSS + markdown + README + metadata)
|
||||
and backend-engineer (Python + bash + tests + CI). A "docs-engineer"
|
||||
or "slides-engineer" persona would fragment ownership of the deck
|
||||
markdown (lead) and the render scripts (backend). D-149 precedent from
|
||||
v1.22 applies: no new personas.
|
||||
|
||||
**One nuance:** python-pptx is a new dependency (backend territory) but
|
||||
the PPTX CONTENT (slide layout, text, image placement) is a design
|
||||
decision that overlaps with lead-developer's deck ownership. The
|
||||
`render_pptx.py` script is backend (Python code); the slide-by-slide
|
||||
layout decisions within it (which image goes where, font sizes) are
|
||||
co-owned with lead-developer. Territory enforcement = `warn` (cross-
|
||||
territory edits logged, not blocked).
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.90** (the roster follows v1.22 precedent; the only new
|
||||
element is python-pptx, which is unambiguously backend).
|
||||
|
||||
### FINDING 10 — Risks / pitfalls (5)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Marp `default` theme padding conflict.** The reference deck's
|
||||
inline `style:` block does NOT set `section` padding. The v1.22
|
||||
root-cause was ZERO padding with the standalone `nova-sp-theme.css`.
|
||||
If `theme: default`'s built-in padding differs from v1.22's settled
|
||||
`48px 56px 40px`, slides may re-overflow. **Mitigation:** explicitly
|
||||
set `section { padding: 48px 56px 40px }` in the v1.23 inline
|
||||
`style:` block (do not rely on the default theme's padding). Verify
|
||||
by re-rendering + visual inspection in P2.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **python-pptx font fallback when Akkurat Pro isn't installed.**
|
||||
python-pptx sets a single `run.font.name = "Akkurat Pro"`; on
|
||||
systems without Akkurat Pro (CI, most laptops), PowerPoint
|
||||
substitutes a default font (often Calibri), NOT Helvetica Neue /
|
||||
Arial. The CSS stack `Akkurat Pro → Helvetica Neue → Arial` does
|
||||
NOT translate to python-pptx (no CSS-style fallback). **Mitigation:**
|
||||
accept PowerPoint's OS-level substitution (the deck will render in
|
||||
a sans font either way); OR set `run.font.name = "Arial"` directly
|
||||
for the structured PPTX (guaranteed present on all systems) and
|
||||
document that the Marp HTML deck uses the full Akkurat Pro stack
|
||||
while the python PPTX uses Arial. The dual-PPTX approach lets the
|
||||
Marp PPTX (rendered by Chromium with the CSS stack) carry the
|
||||
brand font, while the python PPTX (structured, editable) carries
|
||||
Arial for editability.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Image inlining breaking if Marp embeds images as SVG
|
||||
`xlink:href`.** The current HTML uses `<img src="assets/png/...">`
|
||||
(confirmed by grep). BUT if a future Marp version switches to SVG
|
||||
`xlink:href` for the HTML output, the `inline_images.py` regex
|
||||
would miss them. **Mitigation:** the regex should ALSO match
|
||||
`xlink:href="assets/..."` patterns as a fallback; OR pin the
|
||||
Marp version (already pinned at `@4.5.0` in `render_slides.sh`) so
|
||||
the output format is stable.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Consolidated doc losing speaker notes if HTML comments are
|
||||
stripped by Marp.** The plan consolidates the plain `.md` (with
|
||||
`> **Speaker notes:**` blockquotes) into the `-marp.md`. Marp strips
|
||||
HTML comments (`<!-- ... -->`) from rendered output but preserves
|
||||
blockquotes (`> ...`) as `<blockquote>` elements. If speaker notes
|
||||
are moved to HTML comments to hide them from the audience, Marp
|
||||
strips them — and they're lost from the rendered HTML. If they stay
|
||||
as blockquotes, they're visible in the audience deck (bad).
|
||||
**Mitigation:** either (a) drop speaker notes entirely from the
|
||||
consolidated `-marp.md` (the talking-points file is the presenter
|
||||
cue sheet; notes aren't needed in the deck), or (b) keep them as
|
||||
HTML comments (Marp strips from render, but they persist in the
|
||||
source markdown for git-diff readability). Option (b) is safer —
|
||||
the source markdown keeps the notes; the rendered HTML + PPTX
|
||||
don't. Verify Marp strips `<!-- -->` from HTML output (confirmed:
|
||||
Marp's markdown-it does strip HTML comments by default).
|
||||
|
||||
5. **`test_html_embeds_theme` asserts `--sp-red` CSS variable, but the
|
||||
reference inline `style:` uses literal `#D6002A`.** The v1.22 test
|
||||
(line 353-359) asserts `"--sp-red"` in the committed HTML. The
|
||||
reference deck's inline `style:` block uses literal `#D6002A`, not
|
||||
a CSS variable. If v1.23 ports the reference style verbatim, the
|
||||
test fails. **Mitigation:** update the test to assert `"#D6002A"`
|
||||
(literal) OR use CSS variables in the inline `style:` block (Marp
|
||||
supports `:root { --sp-red: #D6002A }` + `color: var(--sp-red)` in
|
||||
the inline style — but the reference deck didn't, so matching the
|
||||
reference means literal colors). Recommendation: use literal colors
|
||||
in the inline `style:` block (matches the reference deck's clean
|
||||
approach) + update the test.
|
||||
|
||||
**Confidence: 0.90** (pitfalls identified from the research findings
|
||||
above; mitigations are concrete).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Assumptions logged (v1.23)
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Assumption | Confidence | Rationale |
|
||||
|----|------------|------------|-----------|
|
||||
| A-1.23.1 | The consolidated `-marp.md` will keep speaker notes as HTML comments (`<!-- -->`), which Marp strips from rendered HTML/PPTX but preserves in the source markdown for git readability. | 0.80 | Marp's markdown-it strips HTML comments by default; the source markdown keeps them. The alternative (drop notes entirely) loses the presenter context. |
|
||||
| A-1.23.2 | `python-pptx` will be added to `pyproject.toml [project.optional-dependencies] test` (not the runtime `dependencies`), since the structured PPTX is a build/test artifact, not a runtime dependency. | 0.90 | The render scripts run in CI + locally, not in the platform runtime. Matches the `moto`/`pytest` pattern. |
|
||||
| A-1.23.3 | The Marp PPTX (`.pptx`) is kept as a "fallback" alongside the new python-pptx structured PPTX (`-python.pptx`); both are committed + release-attached. | 0.85 | The plan says "dual PPTX"; the Marp PPTX is the quick render, the python PPTX is the editable one. Keeping both gives consumers a choice. |
|
||||
| A-1.23.4 | The `nova-sp-theme.css` file is KEPT in `docs/presentations/assets/` as a reference (retired from the render pipeline) but NOT deleted. | 0.90 | The plan says "keep as a reference (retired from render)"; deletion would lose the v1.22 work history. |
|
||||
| A-1.23.5 | The slide count after the word-count trim + "penetrate" removal will stay at 20 main + 1 appendix (the trim is within-slide prose, not slide removal). | 0.75 | The plan says "trim word count" (prose), not "remove slides"; but if a slide becomes too thin it may merge. To be confirmed in execution. |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions surfaced (v1.23 research)
|
||||
|
||||
These research-grounded decisions will be bound in the CLARIFY stage:
|
||||
|
||||
- **D-XXX (0.90):** Revert to `theme: default` + inline `style:` block
|
||||
(port the reference deck's exact CSS from Finding 1). Keep
|
||||
`nova-sp-theme.css` as a retired reference file. Confidence 0.90 —
|
||||
the reference deck's clean look is the target; the CSS is read
|
||||
verbatim.
|
||||
|
||||
- **D-XXX (0.85):** Build `scripts/inline_images.py` (stdlib-only:
|
||||
`base64` + `re` + `mimetypes`) to inline `<img src="assets/...">` →
|
||||
`data:` URIs in the rendered HTML. No external library. Confidence
|
||||
0.95 — confirmed the current HTML uses plain `<img src>`.
|
||||
|
||||
- **D-XXX (0.85):** Build `scripts/render_pptx.py` using python-pptx
|
||||
(>=0.6.23) for a structured, editable PPTX (`-python.pptx`). Keep
|
||||
the Marp PPTX (`.pptx`) as a fallback. Both committed + release-
|
||||
attached. Confidence 0.90 — python-pptx API confirmed.
|
||||
|
||||
- **D-XXX (0.80):** Consolidate the plain `.md` + `-marp.md` into a
|
||||
single `-marp.md`. Speaker notes move to HTML comments (stripped by
|
||||
Marp from render, preserved in source). The plain `.md` is deleted.
|
||||
Confidence 0.80 — the HTML-comment approach preserves notes for git
|
||||
without leaking them to the audience.
|
||||
|
||||
- **D-XXX (0.85):** No new personas for v1.23. lead-developer (deck
|
||||
markdown + inline CSS + README + metadata) + backend-engineer
|
||||
(Python scripts + bash + tests + CI). Territory enforcement = `warn`
|
||||
for `render_pptx.py` (script is backend; slide layout decisions are
|
||||
co-owned with lead-developer). Confidence 0.90 — follows v1.22 D-
|
||||
148/D-149 precedent.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1969,3 +1969,188 @@ release). **DONE.**
|
||||
- Ship: tag `v1.20.6` (final patch = milestone release). Requirements
|
||||
marked complete; ROADMAP marked complete; CHECKPOINT cleared.
|
||||
- **Requirements:** REQ-245..253 (9 requirements, all complete).
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.22 — Nova Deck Layout Fix (complete)
|
||||
|
||||
> Fixes the systemic layout/formatting problems in the Nova presentation
|
||||
> deck that made every slide look "out of whack" after the v1.21 P5
|
||||
> re-render. Root cause (per investigation): `nova-sp-theme.css` had
|
||||
> zero `section` padding (declared `/* @theme nova-sp */` as a comment,
|
||||
> not the `@theme` directive; did not `@import` Marp's default theme).
|
||||
> Combined with `overflow:hidden`, a blunt `img { max-height: 320px }`,
|
||||
> header+footer chrome on every slide, and two P5 diagrams with extreme
|
||||
> aspect ratios (13.52× and 0.63×), 8 of 19 slides overflowed.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Tags run on the v1.21.x line (milestone v1.22 → tags v1.21.0..v1.21.6).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P0 — pre-execution (complete, tag v1.21.0)
|
||||
- SPECIFY → CLARIFY → RESEARCH → PLAN → GRILL. Validated v1.22
|
||||
requirements (REQ-254..262). 8 research findings persisted to
|
||||
RESEARCH.md. 5 CLARIFY decisions auto-resolved (comprehensive scope,
|
||||
full pipeline, re-layout to LR, delete render_deck.sh, split slides
|
||||
3+8). Persona roster: 2 active (lead-developer + backend-engineer),
|
||||
2 deactivated (frontend + data). Grill: PROCEED-WITH-REVISIONS
|
||||
(3 revisions: aspect-ratio test scoped to deck PNGs, @import
|
||||
rejection documented, marp version pinning fallback).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P1 — theme-css (complete, tag v1.21.1)
|
||||
- REQ-254: `section { padding: 48px 56px 40px; overflow: auto; }` —
|
||||
root cause fix (zero padding was why every slide looked jammed
|
||||
against the edges).
|
||||
- REQ-255: `img { max-width: 100%; max-height: 380px; object-fit:
|
||||
contain; }` + `.wide`/`.tall` classes — replaced blunt
|
||||
`max-height: 320px` that broke `w:` directives on tall images.
|
||||
- REQ-256: `section.title header/footer { display: none; }` — title
|
||||
chrome suppression. `h2 + p { margin-top: 0.2em; }`, `p { margin:
|
||||
0.4em 0; }` — spacing tightening. `ol` styling. `table.dense`
|
||||
class. `@media print { section { overflow: hidden; } }` for PPTX.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P2 — render-scripts (complete, tag v1.21.2)
|
||||
- REQ-257: deleted `scripts/render_deck.sh` (omitted `--theme`,
|
||||
produced unthemed output). Pinned marp-cli@4.5.0 + mermaid-cli@
|
||||
11.16.0 in `render_slides.sh`. Removed references from README,
|
||||
sync_to_nova.sh, test_no_forge_mentions.py.
|
||||
- REQ-258: added `-s 2 -b transparent` to mermaid-cli invocation
|
||||
(README spec; produces crisp 2x PNGs with transparent backgrounds).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P3 — mermaid-relayout (complete, tag v1.21.3)
|
||||
- REQ-259: `telemetry-live-ops.mmd` kept as `flowchart TB` (the 3-way
|
||||
branch makes LR too wide at 4.22 aspect; TB gives 0.63 which is
|
||||
legible at h:480 with img.tall class). Re-rendered at 2x transparent
|
||||
(1024x1628).
|
||||
- REQ-260: `platform-pipeline.mmd` restructured from 10-node LR chain
|
||||
(aspect 13.52, illegible 1000x74 strip) to 4-node TB with combined
|
||||
nodes. Re-rendered at 2x transparent (552x1116, aspect 0.49).
|
||||
- Marp deck directives updated: `![w:1000]`/`![w:900]` →
|
||||
`![h:480 class:tall]` so images render at legible height using the
|
||||
img.tall class budget (480px).
|
||||
- Aspect-ratio bounds revised from [1.2, 2.5] to [0.4, 4.0] (accepts
|
||||
both tall and wide diagrams; still catches original outliers).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P4 — deck-content (complete, tag v1.21.4)
|
||||
- REQ-261: split slide 3 (Objectives + Anti-Goals) into Slide 3
|
||||
(Objectives) + Slide 4 (Anti-Goals). Split slide 8 (Attestation
|
||||
Matrix) into Slide 9 (QA, 3 rows) + Slide 10 (Prod/DR, 7 rows).
|
||||
Main slide count 18 → 20.
|
||||
- Trimmed: slide 7 (Pipeline) to 3 bullets. slide 11 (Telemetry) to
|
||||
3 bullets. slide 14 (Deferred) merged 3 Live-AWS rows into 1 (8→6
|
||||
rows). slide 17 (Quarter-by-Quarter) dropped Grounding column
|
||||
(5→4 cols). Global table cell padding reduced (6px 10px → 4px 8px).
|
||||
- Removed `header:` from frontmatter (keep `footer:` + `paginate`
|
||||
only). The full 51-char deck title in BOTH header and footer was
|
||||
redundant chrome eating ~35px on every slide.
|
||||
- Source `.md` and talking-points re-synced to 20-slide structure.
|
||||
- Updated `test_marp_deck_slide_count` (18→20 main + 1 appendix).
|
||||
Updated README slide-count convention (all 6 references).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P5 — render-and-test (complete, tag v1.21.5)
|
||||
- REQ-262: re-rendered HTML + PPTX via `render_slides.sh` (pinned
|
||||
marp-cli@4.5.0, mermaid-cli@11.16.0, 2x transparent PNGs). 22
|
||||
slides (title + 20 main + 1 appendix), 23 media files embedded.
|
||||
Theme embedded in HTML (--sp-red + padding confirmed).
|
||||
- Added 9 tests to `test_slides_pipeline.py` (the gap that let the
|
||||
layout regression through): test_theme_css_has_section_padding,
|
||||
test_theme_css_suppresses_title_chrome,
|
||||
test_theme_css_has_aspect_ratio_aware_images,
|
||||
test_png_aspect_ratios_sane (scoped to deck-referenced PNGs only
|
||||
per GRILL revision 1, bounds [0.4, 4.0]),
|
||||
test_render_slides_has_2x_scale, test_render_slides_pins_cli_versions,
|
||||
test_render_deck_removed, test_html_embeds_theme,
|
||||
test_html_slide_count_matches_marp.
|
||||
- 32 slide tests pass (23 original + 9 new). 94 key-file tests pass.
|
||||
`run_platform.sh --check-only` exit 0.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P6 — final-review-ship (Final Phase, complete, tag v1.21.6)
|
||||
- Multi-persona code review: PASS with 3 P1 flags (all fixed in this
|
||||
phase): source .md/talking-points re-synced to 20 slides, `![h:480
|
||||
class:tall]` directives applied, README stale references updated.
|
||||
- Audit: git log matches `.ciagent/` discipline; all commits have
|
||||
`---ci---` blocks; branch hygiene verified.
|
||||
- Ship: tag `v1.21.6` (final patch = milestone release). Merge
|
||||
`milestone/v1.22-deck-layout-fix` → `main`. Requirements marked
|
||||
complete; ROADMAP marked complete; CHECKPOINT cleared.
|
||||
- **Requirements:** REQ-254..262 (9 requirements, all complete).
|
||||
|
||||
## v1.23 — Nova Deck Cleanup & Python PPTX (active)
|
||||
|
||||
> **NFR milestone** (docs/render/test only; no features). Tags run on the
|
||||
> **v1.22.x** line (milestone v1.23 → tags v1.22.0..v1.22.6). Final patch
|
||||
> `v1.22.6` = milestone release. Branch: `milestone/v1.23-deck-cleanup-python-pptx`.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> Driven by the user's feedback that the deck looked "out of whack" and
|
||||
> the desire to return to the clean, well-formatted style of the old
|
||||
> `the-developer-experience.html` (which used Marp's built-in `default`
|
||||
> theme + an inline `style:` block). That investigation revealed:
|
||||
> (1) the "clean" reference was itself MARP output — MARP is not the
|
||||
> problem; (2) the current deck uses a standalone `nova-sp-theme.css`
|
||||
> that re-derives all base spacing from scratch and had a zero-padding
|
||||
> bug (fixed in v1.22 but the standalone approach is fragile);
|
||||
> (3) there are two markdown documents (a plain source-of-truth `.md`
|
||||
> and a manually-synthesized `-marp.md`) that should be consolidated;
|
||||
> (4) images are referenced as file paths in the HTML, so the HTML
|
||||
> breaks when redistributed without the `assets/` folder; (5) the deck
|
||||
> is verbose in places and uses the term "penetrate" which the user
|
||||
> wants removed.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The milestone delivers: single-document consolidation, clean style
|
||||
> restoration (Marp `default` + inline `style:`), self-contained HTML
|
||||
> (base64 images), a parallel structured python-pptx PPTX generator,
|
||||
> targeted word-count trim, and "penetrate" removal. `nova-sp-theme.css`
|
||||
> is retained as a styling reference but retired from the render path.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P0 — pre-execution (active)
|
||||
- SPECIFY → CLARIFY → RESEARCH → PLAN → GRILL. Establishes v1.23
|
||||
requirements (REQ-263..275). Tag `v1.22.0`. Grill PROCEED-WITH-
|
||||
REVISIONS (0.78): 4 binding revisions applied (G-001 repo-wide
|
||||
"penetrate" purge; G-002 P3→P4 serialized; G-003 P3 split P3a+P3b;
|
||||
G-004 P5+P6 merged).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P1 — consolidate-docs (planned, tag v1.22.1)
|
||||
- REQ-263: fold speaker notes + talking points into `*-marp.md` as Marp
|
||||
HTML comments; delete the plain `.md`. `-marp.md` becomes the sole
|
||||
source of truth.
|
||||
- REQ-264: keep `*-talking-points.md` as a standalone presenter aid,
|
||||
synced from the deck's `<!-- Talking points: -->` comments.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P2 — restore-clean-style (planned, tag v1.22.2)
|
||||
- REQ-265: revert frontmatter to `theme: default` + inline `style:`
|
||||
block (S&P palette). Keep H2 + bold-lead structure, no header, no
|
||||
badges.
|
||||
- REQ-266: retain `nova-sp-theme.css` as a styling reference; drop
|
||||
`--theme` from `render_slides.sh`.
|
||||
- REQ-267: restyle benefit callouts — remove `**Benefit:**` prefix; use
|
||||
`.benefit` class (red top-rule + black italic; white on title slides).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P3a — inline-images (planned, tag v1.22.3)
|
||||
- REQ-268: new `scripts/inline_images.py` — base64-embeds all images in
|
||||
the rendered HTML for redistribution. Invoked after the MARP HTML
|
||||
render. Low-risk, mechanical (G-003 isolation).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P3b — python-pptx-generator (planned, tag v1.22.4)
|
||||
- REQ-269: new `scripts/render_pptx.py` — structured, editable, S&P-themed
|
||||
PPTX via `python-pptx`. 16:9; native tables; embedded PNGs; benefit
|
||||
callouts. Add `python-pptx` to `pyproject.toml`. High-risk, isolated
|
||||
(G-003).
|
||||
- REQ-270: `render_slides.sh` produces both PPTX outputs; CI installs
|
||||
`python-pptx`; both attached to release.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P4 — trim-wordcount + repo-wide "penetrate" purge (planned, tag v1.22.5)
|
||||
- REQ-271: targeted ~20-30% word-count trim on verbose slides (1, 5, 7,
|
||||
8, 13, 14, 20, appendix). Tables untouched. Spirit preserved.
|
||||
- REQ-272: remove "penetrate" (and derivatives) repo-wide (G-001) —
|
||||
`docs/` + `.ciagent/PROJECT.md`/`CLARIFY.md`; RESEARCH.md/PLAN.md/
|
||||
GRILL.md exempt as decision-history. Slide 5's phrase removed with no
|
||||
replacement (slide 4 already excludes the PDLC).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase P5 — ci-tests-readme + review + audit + ship (Final Phase, tag v1.22.6)
|
||||
- REQ-273: CI workflows install `python-pptx`, run `render_slides.sh`,
|
||||
commit HTML + both PPTX + inlined images.
|
||||
- REQ-274: update `test_slides_pipeline.py` (consolidated doc, inline
|
||||
style assertions, image inlining, python-pptx, benefit class,
|
||||
"penetrate" absence). New `test_pptx_generator.py`.
|
||||
- REQ-275: rewrite `README.md` for the single-document + dual-PPTX +
|
||||
image-inlining pipeline.
|
||||
- Review + audit + milestone ship (merged P5+P6 per G-004 — NFR docs
|
||||
milestone). Tag `v1.22.6` (final patch = milestone release). Merge
|
||||
`milestone/v1.23-deck-cleanup-python-pptx` → `main`.
|
||||
- **Requirements:** REQ-263..275 (13 requirements).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
],
|
||||
"active_project": "acdl",
|
||||
"active_projects": ["acdl"],
|
||||
"active_milestone": "v1.22",
|
||||
"active_milestone": "v1.23",
|
||||
"autonomy": {
|
||||
"level": "full",
|
||||
"escalation_hooks": ["deploy", "delete_data", "merge_to_main"],
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
|
||||
=== tools ===
|
||||
terraform: /usr/bin/terraform
|
||||
checkov: /usr/local/bin/checkov
|
||||
python3: /usr/bin/python3
|
||||
jq: /usr/bin/jq
|
||||
rsync: /usr/bin/rsync
|
||||
marp: MISSING
|
||||
mmdc: MISSING
|
||||
Terraform v1.9.8
|
||||
3.3.8
|
||||
Python 3.12.3
|
||||
=== chrome/chromium (for slide render) ===
|
||||
found: /root/.cache/ms-playwright/chromium-1217/chrome-linux64/chrome
|
||||
=== creds ===
|
||||
.env.secrets: present (4 lines)
|
||||
.env: present
|
||||
=== aws creds loadable? ===
|
||||
NOVA_AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID: set
|
||||
AWS_DEFAULT_REGION: us-east-1
|
||||
=== git ===
|
||||
main
|
||||
v1.18.1-11-gaa868c9
|
||||
=== disk ===
|
||||
/dev/loop2 148G 140G 1.3G 100% /
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
{"id": "T1", "req": "REQ-230", "title": "no forge names in synced files (guard test)", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"test": "test_no_forge_mentions_in_synced_files", "result": "1 passed in 2.20s", "log_tail": ["tests/test_no_forge_mentions.py::test_no_forge_mentions_in_synced_files PASSED [100%]", "1 passed in 2.20s"]}}
|
||||
{"id": "T2", "req": "REQ-230", "title": "forge-detection code genericized", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"hardcoded_gitea_gitlab_hits": 0, "genericization_signals": ["contract_ingestor.py: _forge_type() returns 'generic_forge'", "hitl_gates.py: GITHUB_ACTOR or FORGE_ACTOR (no GITEA_ACTOR)", "run_platform.sh:166: GITHUB_ACTOR:-FORGE_ACTOR fallback"]}}
|
||||
{"id": "T3", "req": "REQ-231", "title": "synced docs stripped of internal provenance", "pass": false, "rc": 1, "evidence": {"provenance_hit_count": 40, "contaminated_files": ["docs/ONBOARDING.md (REQ-182,183,184; D-113,114,119)", "docs/METRICS.md (REQ-191,192,193,194,211,212; D-083,096,113,114,119)", "docs/presentations/README.md (REQ-214,226,228; D-130,141; .ciagent/PROJECT.md)", "docs/presentations/nova-no-humans-platform.{md,marp.md,html,talking-points.md} (v1.X milestone headers)", "docs/presentations/assets/mmd/developer-experience-08-semver.mmd (v1.12 header)"], "root_cause": "test_no_forge_mentions.py only guards forge names, not provenance IDs", "defect": "F7"}}
|
||||
{"id": "T4", "req": "REQ-232", "title": "migration docs removed + thesis moved", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"docs_NOVA_MIGRATION_gone": true, "docs_NOVA_AWS_MIGRATION_gone": true, "docs_NO_HUMANS_THESIS_gone": true, "ciagent_NO_HUMANS_THESIS_present": true}}
|
||||
{"id": "T5", "req": "REQ-239", "title": "S&P theme CSS palette on all chrome", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"css_exists": true, "css_size_bytes": 2914, "red_present": true, "black_present": true, "white_present": true, "chrome_covered": ["section/bg", "section.title", "h1-h3 headings", "table th", "blockquote", "pre/code", "header", "footer", "pagination (.bespoke-progress-bar)", "strong"]}}
|
||||
{"id": "T6", "req": "REQ-240", "title": "render pipeline script + mermaid theme", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"render_slides_executable": true, "render_slides_size": 2736, "sp_theme_json_has_red": true, "sp_theme_json_has_black": true, "render_deck_sh_still_present": true, "render_deck_excluded_from_sync": true, "caveat": "README:107 still references render_deck.sh (deferred to T9)"}}
|
||||
{"id": "T7", "req": "REQ-241", "title": "slides CI workflow path trigger", "pass": false, "rc": 1, "evidence": {"wrong_path_hits": [".github/workflows/slides.yml:8: - 'assets/nova-sp-theme.css' (non-existent)", "workflows-src/slides.yml:8: - 'assets/nova-sp-theme.css' (non-existent)"], "correct_path": "docs/presentations/assets/nova-sp-theme.css", "src_dotgithub_identical": true, "defect": "F6", "impact": "Explicit CSS path trigger points at nothing; only the docs/presentations/** glob catches CSS edits. Dead entry should be corrected or removed."}}
|
||||
{"id": "T8", "req": "REQ-242", "title": "slide-pipeline guard test", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"passed": 12, "failed": 0, "duration_s": 1.1, "tests": ["sp_theme_css_exists", "sp_theme_css_has_snp_colors", "sp_theme_json_has_snp_colors", "marp_deck_uses_sp_theme", "marp_deck_not_using_default_theme", "render_slides_script_exists", "render_slides_script_renders_mermaid", "render_slides_script_renders_marp", "slides_ci_workflow_exists", "slides_ci_workflow_triggers_on_presentations", "every_mmd_has_png", "readme_no_retired_decks"], "coverage_gap": "test_slides_ci_workflow_triggers_on_presentations checks docs/presentations/** glob but NOT the explicit CSS path \u2014 gap that allowed F6"}}
|
||||
{"id": "T9", "req": "REQ-243", "title": "presentations README documents render pipeline + retired decks gone", "pass": false, "rc": 1, "evidence": {"retired_decks_present": false, "readme_mentions_render_slides": false, "readme_mentions_render_deck": true, "readme_render_deck_line": "docs/presentations/README.md:107: 'automated by scripts/render_deck.sh'", "readme_mentions_theme_css": true, "defect": "F10", "impact": "README documents the retired render_deck.sh pipeline, not the active render_slides.sh. Consumers reading synced README reference a script excluded from sync."}}
|
||||
{"id": "T10", "req": "REQ-244", "title": "12-month product roadmap slides 20+21 + talking points", "pass": true, "rc": 0, "evidence": {"marp_slide15": true, "marp_slide20": true, "marp_slide21": true, "talking_points_slide15": true, "talking_points_slide20": true, "talking_points_slide21": true, "quarters": ["Q1 Pilot Activation", "Q2 Provable Trust", "Q3 Compounding ROI", "Q4 Agentic Substrate"], "distinct_from_slide15": true}}
|
||||
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ every deck and a presenter-ready cue sheet for delivery.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Step 1: full markdown Step 2: Marp deck Step 3: HTML + PPTX Step 4: Talking points
|
||||
(source of truth) ──► (lean, 19 slides) ──► (rendered) ──► (presenter cues)
|
||||
(source of truth) ──► (lean, 21 slides) ──► (rendered) ──► (presenter cues)
|
||||
*.md *-marp.md *.html / *.pptx *-talking-points.md
|
||||
+ speaker notes + embedded PNG diagrams + 3-6 bullets per slide
|
||||
+ mermaid code blocks + Marp frontmatter + key takeaway per slide
|
||||
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Distill the source of truth (Step 1) into presenter-ready cues, indexed by
|
||||
the Marp deck (Step 2) slide structure:
|
||||
|
||||
- **One section per Marp slide** — `## Slide N — Title`, matching the Marp
|
||||
deck's 18 main + 1 appendix slide structure exactly.
|
||||
deck's 20 main + 1 appendix slide structure exactly.
|
||||
- **3-6 talking point bullets per slide** — punchy, actionable cues distilled
|
||||
from the source markdown's speaker notes.
|
||||
- **Key takeaway per slide** — the one memorable thing the audience should
|
||||
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ the Marp deck (Step 2) slide structure:
|
||||
```
|
||||
docs/presentations/
|
||||
├── README.md ← this file
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md ← Step 1: full source of truth (18 main slides + speaker notes)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md ← Step 2: Marp deck (18 main + 1 appendix = 19 slides)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md ← Step 1: full source of truth (20 main slides + speaker notes)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md ← Step 2: Marp deck (20 main + 1 appendix = 21 slides)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html ← Step 3: rendered HTML (committed, S&P-themed)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.pptx ← Step 3: rendered PPTX (committed, S&P-themed)
|
||||
├── nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-talking-points.md ← Step 4: presenter cues (19 sections)
|
||||
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ attached to the phase's release.
|
||||
|
||||
| Deck | Source of truth (Step 1) | Marp deck (Step 2) | Rendered HTML + PPTX (Step 3) | Talking points (Step 4) | Slides | Audience |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| Nova — The Autonomous Cloud Delivery Platform | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md` | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md` | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html` + `.pptx` (committed + release-attached) | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-talking-points.md` | 18 main + 1 appendix (19) | CTO, Head of Cloud, Head of Infra, Head of DevOps |
|
||||
| Nova — The Autonomous Cloud Delivery Platform | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.md` | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-marp.md` | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery.html` + `.pptx` (committed + release-attached) | `nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery-talking-points.md` | 20 main + 1 appendix (21) | CTO, Head of Cloud, Head of Infra, Head of DevOps |
|
||||
|
||||
> **v1.21:** the deck was renamed from "No-Humans Infrastructure Platform"
|
||||
> to "Autonomous Cloud Delivery Platform" (professional framing; conveys
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -128,4 +128,4 @@ strong { color: var(--sp-red); }
|
||||
* we clamp to `hidden` so the exported slide is clean. */
|
||||
@media print {
|
||||
section { overflow: hidden; }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ Every hour a developer spends writing, deploying, fixing, or remediating infrast
|
||||
|
||||
**How intent becomes verified infrastructure — fail-fast policy scanning before the plan, runtime scanning after it.**
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
- **Contract → resolver → adapter → Checkov on static code (before plan) → terraform plan → Wiz on the plan → confidence signal → stage gate → apply → evidence + ledger**
|
||||
- **Fail-fast, quick feedback** — Checkov runs on the authored Terraform code before `terraform plan` so developers get immediate policy feedback
|
||||
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ Separation-of-duties on prod: the approver cannot be the same person who built t
|
||||
|
||||
**Every metric in this deck is traceable to a real emitted signal — the live-ops dashboard makes operations visible in PowerBI.**
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
- **Platform components → CloudEvents envelope → event log + decision ledger + run records → collector → cold store → PowerBI views → live ops dashboard**
|
||||
- **The live ops dashboard (PowerBI)** surfaces the four CTO-grade metrics (Lead Time, Vulnerability Count, MTTR, Cloud Spend) alongside trust metrics (Decision Ledger coverage, Attestation coverage) and efficiency metrics (touchless resolution, escalation frequency)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,104 +21,120 @@
|
||||
- State the attestation model up front: QA for production, SRE for operational readiness
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomous operations with provable trust — security, remediation velocity, reliability, lead time made visible, not promised
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 3 — Strategic Objectives + Anti-Goals
|
||||
### Slide 3 — Strategic Objectives
|
||||
- Objective #1: zero-touch operations — autonomy as the default, not the demo; stage-gate attestation (QA, SRE) remains human by design
|
||||
- Objective #2 is the one to land carefully: trust = deterministic scoring, not an LLM; the platform functions without AI
|
||||
- Objective #3: four CTO-grade metrics (Lead Time, Vuln Count, MTTR, Spend) — all flow into PowerBI
|
||||
- Objective #4 is the integration thesis: Nova integrates with any upstream source; provides skills + MCP; all prod intents go through the same controls
|
||||
- Anti-goals #3 and #4 protect the scope: not an upstream dev platform, not a PDLC replacement
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** purpose-built for infra ops, integrates with any source through one contract, measures success on four CTO metrics
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the scope is explicit — Nova governs infra + delivery, integrates with any source through one contract, measures success on four CTO metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 4 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
|
||||
### Slide 4 — Anti-Goals (What Nova Is NOT)
|
||||
- Not a general-purpose AI agent platform
|
||||
- Not a system that removes humans from accountability — only from normal operations
|
||||
- Not an upstream development platform (no product backlogs, IDE, code authorship)
|
||||
- Not a replacement for the Product Development Lifecycle (PDLC)
|
||||
- Anti-goals #3 and #4 protect the scope boundary — Nova will not become an IDE or a product-planning tool
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the boundaries are explicit — Nova is purpose-built for infra ops + delivery, not a general-purpose AI agent or an upstream dev platform
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 5 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
|
||||
- Nova governs infra + delivery only; the PDLC (backlog, code authorship, IDE) is upstream — Nova never penetrates it
|
||||
- Integration is only through the validated contract boundary
|
||||
- Any upstream source (AI agent, agentic SDLC, dev platform) produces submissions subject to the same compliance standards
|
||||
- Nova validates the submission, not the author
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** Nova is purpose-built for infrastructure operations; the scope boundary is clean and bounded
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 5 — RACI: Who Owns What
|
||||
### Slide 6 — RACI: Who Owns What
|
||||
- Four roles now: Citizen Developer, Platform, Quality Engineering, SRE
|
||||
- Quality attestation is owned by Quality Engineering (not the Platform); Production readiness is owned by SRE
|
||||
- The Platform runs the checks agentically but is never the Accountable party for the gate — that separation keeps the platform honest
|
||||
- Production readiness is co-owned: the platform runs attestations; the citizen developer authorizes the promotion at the stage gate
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** you bring FRs + UAT; Nova provides NFRs + infra; QE guards the gate evidence; SRE signs off on production readiness
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 6 — The Platform Pipeline
|
||||
### Slide 7 — The Platform Pipeline
|
||||
- Walk the pipeline left-to-right: contract → resolver → adapter → Checkov (static) → plan → Wiz (on plan) → confidence → gate → apply
|
||||
- Two-stage scan: Checkov on static code BEFORE the plan (fail-fast dev feedback); Wiz on the plan (or Checkov as drop-in if no Wiz creds)
|
||||
- Never both Wiz + Checkov on the plan — avoid duplicate noise
|
||||
- Dev is autonomous; qa/prod/dr require attestation (QA for quality, SRE for production readiness)
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** two layers of scanning, zero operator involvement in normal operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 7 — The Decision Ledger
|
||||
### Slide 8 — The Decision Ledger
|
||||
- "AI decisions" are really automated decisions — deterministic scripts calculate a score; the platform functions without AI
|
||||
- Do not dwell on the storage substrate — the value is accountability (immutable, queryable, traceable to outcome), not the database
|
||||
- Every stage-gate attestation is captured with approver identity and the evidence presented
|
||||
- When an LLM planner is added later, it emits richer alternatives without breaking the schema
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomous is defensible because every decision is immutable, queryable, accountable — and "automated" means deterministic scoring, not a black-box LLM
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 8 — The Attestation Matrix
|
||||
- The matrix is not a rubber stamp — structured, freshness-validated, separation-of-duties-enforced
|
||||
### Slide 9 — Attestation Matrix: QA
|
||||
- The matrix is not a rubber stamp — structured, freshness-validated
|
||||
- Each concern now has a plain-language description of what is being attested (the old "operator-supplied" label is gone)
|
||||
- SoD on prod: the approver can't be the same person who built it
|
||||
- Three QA concerns: functional correctness (24h), performance baseline (7d), security posture (24h)
|
||||
- Each concern has a freshness window — evidence older than the window does not satisfy the gate
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** QA signs off on quality before any promotion — the gate is explicit, not implicit
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 10 — Attestation Matrix: Prod/DR
|
||||
- Seven prod/DR concerns: operational readiness, incident response, capacity & cost, DR drill, chaos, backup, DR region deploy
|
||||
- SRE signs off on operability (runbooks, dashboards, on-call), incident response, capacity, and the three resilience checks
|
||||
- Each concern has a freshness window — 30d/90d/180d depending on the control
|
||||
- SoD on prod: the approver can't be the same person who built it — the rule that keeps the gate honest
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** autonomy in operations, human in accountability, by design — the matrix is what makes autonomous operations safe enough to trust in production
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 9 — Telemetry & Live Ops
|
||||
### Slide 11 — Telemetry & Live Ops
|
||||
- Deliberately minimal: Nova-native CloudEvents; no Kafka/Prometheus/ClickHouse
|
||||
- The live-ops dashboard is built in PowerBI on top of the exported views — leadership sees the same numbers the platform produces
|
||||
- Every number in the Proof slides is traceable to a signal — "where does this number come from?" → a query against the cold store
|
||||
- This is where the "infrastructure operations become visible" theme lands concretely
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the architecture is the trust substrate — operations become visible in PowerBI, with full traceability
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 10 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
|
||||
### Slide 12 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
|
||||
- Both 100% — no automated decision is ever lost; no prod/dr promotion lands without a human sign-off
|
||||
- The mandatory-by-design point: the ledger entry + the human attestation are a gate, not a best-effort feature
|
||||
- Easily queried: by run, by environment, by approver, by outcome — the audit trail is a query, not a forensic exercise
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** trust is provable — not a marketing claim, a queryable record; no change to production without both the ledger entry and the human attestation
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 11 — Cost & ROI
|
||||
### Slide 13 — Cost & ROI
|
||||
- The ROI formula is shown inline — not hidden in a footnote
|
||||
- The four CTO-grade metrics are the ROI proof — Lead Time, Vuln Count, MTTR, Cloud Spend
|
||||
- The N=0 caveat is stated explicitly: the formula is grounded; the production numbers activate with a pilot
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the ROI is not a black box — the formula is shown, the four metrics are committed, the production-denominator caveat is up front
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 12 — What's Deferred — and Why
|
||||
### Slide 14 — What's Deferred — and Why
|
||||
- The preempt is critical: these deferrals are measurement infrastructure, not autonomy — the platform IS autonomous in operations
|
||||
- The blocking work is named in plain language (no decision IDs) — "live AWS re-provisioning", "drift-detection scheduler", "ML service"
|
||||
- Showing this to leadership demonstrates honesty, not weakness
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the autonomy is real; the measurement gaps are documented with the work that unblocks each one
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 13 — Roadmap to the North Star
|
||||
### Slide 15 — Roadmap to the North Star
|
||||
- Each deferred metric has an unblock path and a timeframe — near-term, mid-term, longer-term
|
||||
- No status column: most of it is not implemented yet, so status would be noise
|
||||
- Re-evaluation triggers: each blocking piece of work lifts on its own schedule
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** every deferred metric has a plan and a timeframe — nothing is hand-waved
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 14 — 12-Month Product Roadmap
|
||||
### Slide 16 — 12-Month Product Roadmap
|
||||
- This is the *product* roadmap, forward-looking only
|
||||
- Q1 Pilot Activation → Q2 Provable Trust → Q3 Compounding ROI → Q4 Integration & Predictive
|
||||
- Each quarter activates one strategic objective from the North Star
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the 12-month product arc — each quarter activates a strategic objective and its board-level metric
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 15 — Quarter-by-Quarter Outcomes
|
||||
### Slide 17 — Quarter-by-Quarter Outcomes
|
||||
- Q1: three post-pilot metrics go live (Touchless ≥99%, Escalation <0.1%, Accuracy ≥99.5%) — denominator activates with the pilot
|
||||
- Q2: Decision Ledger Coverage was already grounded — tamper-evidence is the Q2 upgrade (local hash-chain → Object Lock + signed checkpoints)
|
||||
- Q3: Drift Auto-Reversal ≥95% unblocks when the drift scheduler ships; Spend Reduction ≥25% measured against the pilot baseline
|
||||
- Q4: Predictive:Reactive ≥3:1 requires the ML forecasting service; AI-Agent Intent Share is a first measurement (aspirational-metric)
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** each quarter has a concrete deliverable, a target metric grounded in a strategic objective, and a path from deferred to shipped
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 16 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (1/2)
|
||||
### Slide 18 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (1/2)
|
||||
- Nova instructs the citizen developer's AI agent via skills (markdown, keyed to engineering domains) + an MCP server (4 tools, plugin-registry, stdio)
|
||||
- The integration point is the same regardless of source — AI agent, agentic SDLC, traditional IDE all get the same skills + MCP
|
||||
- This is how Nova makes the citizen developer production-grade without owning the PDLC
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** the citizen developer's AI agent is not unguided — Nova provides engineering principles as skills + MCP
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 17 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (2/2)
|
||||
### Slide 19 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (2/2)
|
||||
- The value is the gap deterministic scanners leave: engineering discipline (Wiz/Checkmarx/Mend check policy/secrets, not discipline)
|
||||
- The MCP server catches "is this service observable?", "is this error path handled?", "is this API contract clear?"
|
||||
- Vendored at a pinned tag → audit reproducibility — a validation result is replayable months later
|
||||
- **Key takeaway:** submissions are checked for engineering discipline, not just policy compliance — and the check is reproducible for audit
|
||||
|
||||
### Slide 18 — Recap + Ask
|
||||
### Slide 20 — Recap + Ask
|
||||
- Recap the 4-beat arc so the audience leaves with the structure
|
||||
- The ask is a business decision: approve a pilot estate + the tamper-evident ledger build-out
|
||||
- "Pipeline-ready" → "production-proven" is the value proposition
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
@@ -98,10 +98,7 @@ operations.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 3 — Strategic Objectives + Anti-Goals
|
||||
|
||||
**Four objectives Nova is building toward; four anti-goals that keep it
|
||||
focused.**
|
||||
## Slide 3 — Strategic Objectives
|
||||
|
||||
**4 Strategic Objectives:**
|
||||
1. **Demonstrate production-grade zero-touch operations** — autonomy as
|
||||
@@ -128,7 +125,21 @@ focused.**
|
||||
to deploy to production go through the same rigorous controls,
|
||||
quality gates, attestation, and evidence stream.
|
||||
|
||||
**4 Anti-Goals (what Nova is NOT):**
|
||||
> **Benefit:** the scope is explicit — Nova governs infrastructure and
|
||||
> delivery, integrates with any upstream source through one validated
|
||||
> contract, and measures success on four metrics a CTO can repeat back.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** Objective #2 is the one to land carefully: trust is
|
||||
> established by deterministic scoring, not by an LLM. The platform
|
||||
> functions without AI.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Transition:** "The objectives are concrete — here is what Nova is
|
||||
> NOT, to keep it focused."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 4 — Anti-Goals (What Nova Is NOT)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Not a general-purpose AI agent platform.
|
||||
2. Not a system that removes humans from accountability — only from
|
||||
normal operations.
|
||||
@@ -136,13 +147,11 @@ focused.**
|
||||
authorship).
|
||||
4. Not a replacement for the Product Development Lifecycle (PDLC).
|
||||
|
||||
> **Benefit:** the scope is explicit — Nova governs infrastructure and
|
||||
> delivery, integrates with any upstream source through one validated
|
||||
> contract, and measures success on four metrics a CTO can repeat back.
|
||||
> **Benefit:** the boundaries are explicit — Nova is purpose-built for
|
||||
> infrastructure operations and delivery, not a general-purpose AI agent
|
||||
> or an upstream development platform.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** Objective #2 is the one to land carefully: trust is
|
||||
> established by deterministic scoring, not by an LLM. The platform
|
||||
> functions without AI. Anti-goals #3 and #4 protect the scope boundary —
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** Anti-goals #3 and #4 protect the scope boundary —
|
||||
> Nova will not become an IDE or a product-planning tool.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Transition:** "The scope boundary is explicit — here is exactly
|
||||
@@ -150,7 +159,7 @@ focused.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 4 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
|
||||
## Slide 5 — Scope: Downstream of PDLC
|
||||
|
||||
**Nova governs infrastructure and delivery. The PDLC is upstream — Nova
|
||||
never penetrates it. Integration is through one validated contract.**
|
||||
@@ -183,7 +192,7 @@ never penetrates it. Integration is through one validated contract.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 5 — RACI: Who Owns What
|
||||
## Slide 6 — RACI: Who Owns What
|
||||
|
||||
**Four roles, one matrix — the citizen developer owns FRs + UAT, the
|
||||
platform owns NFRs + infra, quality engineering owns the gate evidence,
|
||||
@@ -224,7 +233,7 @@ and SRE owns operational readiness.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 6 — The Platform Pipeline
|
||||
## Slide 7 — The Platform Pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
**How intent becomes verified infrastructure — with fail-fast policy
|
||||
scanning before the plan and runtime scanning after it.**
|
||||
@@ -272,7 +281,7 @@ graph LR
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 7 — The Decision Ledger
|
||||
## Slide 8 — The Decision Ledger
|
||||
|
||||
**Every automated decision is captured, immutable, queryable — and
|
||||
accountable.**
|
||||
@@ -310,16 +319,42 @@ accountable.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 8 — The Attestation Matrix
|
||||
## Slide 9 — Attestation Matrix: QA
|
||||
|
||||
**The designed controls that keep humans at stage gates — structured,
|
||||
freshness-validated, and separation-of-duties-enforced.**
|
||||
**The designed controls that keep humans at stage gates — QA concerns,
|
||||
freshness-validated.**
|
||||
|
||||
| Concern | Env | Freshness | Description |
|
||||
|---------|-----|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Functional correctness | qa | 24h | The application behaves as specified; evidence accepted from the consumer's UAT. |
|
||||
| Performance baseline | qa | 7d | The deployment meets its performance envelope vs. the agreed baseline. |
|
||||
| Security posture | qa | 24h | The deployment's security findings have been reviewed and accepted. |
|
||||
|
||||
- Each concern has a freshness window — evidence older than the window
|
||||
does not satisfy the gate.
|
||||
- Concerns that are offline-testable run for real; concerns that require
|
||||
external evidence accept signed artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Benefit:** QA signs off on quality before any promotion — the gate
|
||||
> is explicit, not implicit.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** The matrix is not a rubber stamp. Each concern has a
|
||||
> freshness window and a plain-language description of what is being
|
||||
> attested. The "operator-supplied" label from the prior deck was
|
||||
> dropped — every concern now has a plain-language description.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Transition:** "QA is half the matrix — here are the production and
|
||||
> DR controls."
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 10 — Attestation Matrix: Prod/DR
|
||||
|
||||
**Production and DR controls — operational readiness, resilience, and
|
||||
disaster recovery.**
|
||||
|
||||
| Concern | Env | Freshness | Description |
|
||||
|---------|-----|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| Operational readiness | prod | 30d | SRE confirms the deployment is operable: runbooks, dashboards, on-call coverage. |
|
||||
| Incident response | prod | 90d | The on-call path has been exercised; the deployment has a working incident-response plan. |
|
||||
| Capacity & cost | prod | 30d | Capacity headroom and monthly cost are within the agreed envelope. |
|
||||
@@ -332,17 +367,16 @@ freshness-validated, and separation-of-duties-enforced.**
|
||||
does not satisfy the gate.
|
||||
- **Separation-of-duties on prod:** the approver cannot be the same
|
||||
person who built the deployment.
|
||||
- Concerns that are offline-testable run for real; concerns that require
|
||||
external evidence accept signed artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Benefit:** the gate model is explicit — autonomy in operations,
|
||||
> human in accountability, by design. The matrix is what makes autonomous
|
||||
> operations safe enough to trust in production.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** The matrix is not a rubber stamp. Each concern has a
|
||||
> freshness window, a description, and a separation-of-duties rule. The
|
||||
> "operator-supplied" label from the prior deck was dropped — every
|
||||
> concern now has a plain-language description of what is being attested.
|
||||
> **Speaker notes:** The prod/DR rows are the operational-readiness and
|
||||
> resilience gates — SRE signs off on operability, incident response,
|
||||
> capacity, and the three resilience checks (DR drill, chaos, backup).
|
||||
> Separation-of-duties on prod is the rule that keeps the gate honest:
|
||||
> the approver cannot be the same person who built the deployment.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Transition:** "You've seen how Nova works — the pipeline, the ledger,
|
||||
> the attestation gates. Here is how Nova instruments itself so that
|
||||
@@ -350,7 +384,7 @@ freshness-validated, and separation-of-duties-enforced.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 9 — Telemetry & Live Ops
|
||||
## Slide 11 — Telemetry & Live Ops
|
||||
|
||||
**Every metric in this deck is traceable to a real emitted signal — and
|
||||
the live-ops dashboard makes operations visible in PowerBI.**
|
||||
@@ -399,7 +433,7 @@ graph TB
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 10 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
|
||||
## Slide 12 — Decision Ledger + Attestation Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
**By design, no change reaches production without a ledger entry and a
|
||||
human attestation — both queryable for auditing, with full
|
||||
@@ -435,7 +469,7 @@ traceability.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 11 — Cost & ROI
|
||||
## Slide 13 — Cost & ROI
|
||||
|
||||
**The ROI formula and the cost estimates — grounded, with the production
|
||||
denominator honestly flagged.**
|
||||
@@ -466,7 +500,7 @@ denominator honestly flagged.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 12 — What's Deferred — and Why
|
||||
## Slide 14 — What's Deferred — and Why
|
||||
|
||||
**Honesty about what is not measured yet — and the blocking work for
|
||||
each.**
|
||||
@@ -502,7 +536,7 @@ metrics — not the autonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 13 — Roadmap to the North Star
|
||||
## Slide 15 — Roadmap to the North Star
|
||||
|
||||
**The path from the grounded metrics to the 12–18 month targets — each
|
||||
deferred metric has an unblock path and a candidate milestone.**
|
||||
@@ -533,7 +567,7 @@ deferred metric has an unblock path and a candidate milestone.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 14 — 12-Month Product Roadmap
|
||||
## Slide 16 — 12-Month Product Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
**The product arc from pilot activation to integration — four quarters,
|
||||
four outcomes.**
|
||||
@@ -560,7 +594,7 @@ integration) and the deferred-metric unblock paths.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 15 — Quarter-by-Quarter Outcomes
|
||||
## Slide 17 — Quarter-by-Quarter Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
| Quarter | Product theme | Key deliverable | Target metric | Grounding |
|
||||
|---------|---------------|-----------------|---------------|-----------|
|
||||
@@ -587,7 +621,7 @@ anymore, and the audit trail is stronger than it ever was.'"*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 16 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (1/2)
|
||||
## Slide 18 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (1/2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Nova instructs the citizen developer's AI agent on production-grade
|
||||
engineering — a set of skills and an MCP server.**
|
||||
@@ -621,7 +655,7 @@ engineering — a set of skills and an MCP server.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 17 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (2/2)
|
||||
## Slide 19 — Production-Grade Guidance via Atelier (2/2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Agentic validation catches engineering-discipline gaps that deterministic
|
||||
scanners miss — and the validation is reproducible.**
|
||||
@@ -656,7 +690,7 @@ scanners miss — and the validation is reproducible.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Slide 18 — Recap + Ask
|
||||
## Slide 20 — Recap + Ask
|
||||
|
||||
**The 4-beat recap + the business decision.**
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -710,4 +744,4 @@ S3 Object Lock + signed checkpoints. These two decisions move Nova from
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> **End of deck.** 18 main slides + 1 appendix slide = 19 total.
|
||||
> **End of deck.** 20 main slides + 1 appendix slide = 21 total.
|
||||
Binary file not shown.
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ v1.21 adds (REQ-245,251,252):
|
||||
- Deck renamed to nova-autonomous-cloud-delivery*
|
||||
- No maturity badges in the Marp deck
|
||||
- No version in the Marp footer/title slide
|
||||
- 18 main + 1 appendix slides
|
||||
- 20 main + 1 appendix slides (v1.22 split slides 3+8 to relieve overflow)
|
||||
- No D-###/REQ-###/internal .py paths in audience-facing slides
|
||||
- Title is "Nova — The Autonomous Cloud Delivery Platform"
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user