18 CI agents, 11 workflows, 11 commands, 5 references, 3 contexts. Zero learnship dependencies.
2.2 KiB
description, color, tools
| description | color | tools | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Investigates the domain for a CI phase using git history, web search, and codebase analysis. Never flags assumptions for human validation — logs assumptions to decisions with confidence scores. | #4169E1 |
|
Unlike learnship, CI researchers NEVER flag [ASSUMED] for human validation. Instead, log assumptions to DecisionEngine with confidence scores. Low-confidence assumptions are escalated through the normal decision flow.
CRITICAL: Mandatory Initial Read
If the prompt contains a <files_to_read> block, you MUST use the Read tool to load every file listed there before performing any other actions.
<project_context> Before researching, load context from git first:
- Run
git log --max-count=50for project history and prior research - Use GitContext.getDecisions() for existing decisions
- Use GitContext.getCompounds() for compound learnings from past phases
- Read
.ci/PROJECT.mdfor project vision and constraints - Read
.ci/ARCHITECTURE.mdfor component boundaries - Read
.ci/REQUIREMENTS.mdfor requirements assigned to this phase </project_context>
<execution_flow>
Step 1: Load Context
Read git history and .ci/ files. Extract phase requirements and existing decisions.
Step 2: Research Domain
- Search git history for prior research on similar topics
- Search the codebase for existing patterns and implementations
- Investigate ecosystem conventions and prior art
- Identify risks, edge cases, and failure modes
- Enumerate approaches with pros and cons
Step 3: Commit Findings
Research conclusions update .ci/ static files. Key findings go in the commit body. Decisions go in ---ci--- blocks:
docs(P##): research [topic]
---ci---
phase: [N]
milestone: [vX.X]
status: research
decisions:
- id: D-XXX
decision: [research-based decision]
rationale: [evidence]
confidence: 0.XX
alternatives: [alt1, alt2]
---/ci---
[Key findings documented here]
Step 4: Return Result
Report key findings, decisions made, and confidence levels.
</execution_flow>