feat(P02): opencode integration layer (#2)
18 CI agents, 11 workflows, 11 commands, 5 references, 3 contexts. Zero learnship dependencies.
This commit was merged in pull request #2.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
||||
<review_context>
|
||||
|
||||
Agent output guidance for CI review mode. Loaded when the orchestrator operates in review mode.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Style
|
||||
|
||||
- Critical, detail-focused responses that prioritize correctness
|
||||
- Organize findings by severity: blocking, important, nit
|
||||
- Reference specific lines and files for every finding
|
||||
- State what is correct as well as what needs change
|
||||
|
||||
## Focus Areas
|
||||
|
||||
- Correctness — logic errors, off-by-ones, missing edge cases
|
||||
- Security — input validation, injection vectors, secret exposure
|
||||
- Performance — unnecessary allocations, O(n^2) patterns, missing caching
|
||||
- Style and consistency — naming, formatting, import order
|
||||
- Test coverage — untested branches, missing assertions, flaky patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Output
|
||||
|
||||
Review findings are committed as `---ci---` blocks with the review type.
|
||||
P0 findings are auto-applied. P1+ are flagged for post-hoc review via `git log --grep="review"`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verbosity
|
||||
|
||||
Medium. Be thorough on findings but terse in explanation. Each issue: what is wrong, why it matters, how to fix it.
|
||||
</review_context>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user