e3416f8e77
---ci---
phase: 0
milestone: v1.0
status: specify
decisions:
- id: D-001
decision: Use Gitea org continuous-intelligence for all ACDL repos
rationale: User-specified target org; already exists at git.cloudinit.dev
confidence: 0.95
alternatives: [new dedicated demo org]
- id: D-002
decision: Map "GitHub Actions" to Gitea Actions (act_runner) using same workflow YAML
rationale: Environment is Gitea; syntax-compatible with act_runner
confidence: 0.85
alternatives: [migrate to GitHub.com, raw shell scripts]
- id: D-003
decision: Collapse acdl-platform into the existing empty acdl repo
rationale: acdl already exists at org root; avoids a 4th repo
confidence: 0.90
alternatives: [create separate acdl-platform repo]
- id: D-004
decision: Use Gitea environment blocks + required reviewers for QA/Prod; fallback to manual workflow_dispatch with approval input
rationale: Spec mandates approval gates; forge supports environment protection
confidence: 0.80
alternatives: [external approval bot, no approval gates]
- id: D-005
decision: Hash-chained ledger (prev_hash + own hash via SHA-256 of canonical JSON) for evidence; declared demonstrative not adversarially secure
rationale: Spec asks for simple JSON; chain gives visible tamper-evidence
confidence: 0.85
alternatives: [signed commits only, full Merkle tree]
- id: D-006
decision: Confidence gate threshold = 0.50 exactly (base 0.90, fail drops to 0.40)
rationale: Explicit in spec
confidence: 0.99
alternatives: []
- id: D-007
decision: Each mock_apply.sh echoes "[L1: <name>] applying..." + "OK", sleeps 1s, exits 0
rationale: Spec literal; uniformity aids timeline parsing
confidence: 0.95
alternatives: [randomized sleep durations]
- id: D-008
decision: L3B keyword->stack mapping: gas/price/ingest/data-lake->commodity-price-feed; invoice/billing->invoice-service; analytics/historical/query->energy-analytics-api; regulatory/compliance/reporting/trading->regulatory-reporting; fallback->invoice-service
rationale: Mirrors the 4 L2 modules + Act 3 example issue text
confidence: 0.85
alternatives: [single default stack, ML classifier (forbidden by no-AI constraint)]
- id: D-009
decision: Init milestone = v1.0, branch milestone/v1.0-initial
rationale: init.md Step 5 mandates milestone/v1.0-initial
confidence: 0.99
alternatives: []
- id: D-010
decision: Single-project mode for the acdl checkout; ---ci--- blocks omit project field
rationale: User chose standalone single-project; no other projects in this checkout
confidence: 0.90
alternatives: [register acdl in /root multi-project config]
---/ci---
Specification: 30-minute executive demo of the Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform proving automatic, safe, audited infra delivery via local stubs on Gitea Actions (no cloud, no AI APIs).
Requirements: [3 repos under continuous-intelligence org, 8 L1 stub modules, 4 L2 composed modules mirroring S&P Global Energy use cases, 5 core scripts (mock_executor.sh, policy_checker.py, confidence_signal.py, evidence_writer.py, l3b_agent_stub.py), reusable Dev->QA->Prod pipeline with approval gates, issue-triggered L3B agent, Pages evidence timeline UI, 4 scripted demo acts]
Constraints: [local Linux OS, Gitea Actions + Environments, no AWS/GCP/Azure, no external LLM APIs, state in flat JSON/artifacts, EKS Fargate + serverless primitives (no VPC module), L1 single-purpose substrate-agnostic max-depth-1, L2 max-depth-5]
Out of scope: [real cloud provisioning, real LLM inference, production-grade infrastructure, adversarial tamper-proofing of evidence]
5.8 KiB
5.8 KiB
ACDL — Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform
Vision / Core Value
A 30-minute executive demo proving that infrastructure can be delivered automatically, safely, and with a complete audit trail — without the usual weeks of manual tickets, reviews, and copy-pasted configuration. Because the demo runs entirely on local stubs (no AWS/GCP/Azure, no external LLM APIs), it shows intent and safety behavior rather than provisioning real cloud resources.
Objective
Build a runnable demo (Linux + GitHub/Gitea Actions) that walks executives through four acts:
- Act 1 — The Friction: the old manual 2-week deployment process.
- Act 2 — Developer Self-Service: commit a valid
contract.yamlforl2-commodity-price-feed, watch Dev auto-run, QA + Prod approval gates, then the evidence timeline. - Act 3 — Citizen Developer: open a GitHub Issue with natural-language intent; the Python keyword parser generates the same
contract.yamland triggers the identical pipeline. - Act 4 — The Safety Net: commit a malicious
contract.yaml(public-ingress: true) forl2-regulatory-reporting; the pipeline halts in Dev because the confidence signal drops below 0.50, and the rejection is visible on the evidence stream.
Requirements
Validated
- Three repos under the
continuous-intelligenceGitea org:acdl(platform + stubs + reusable workflows),acdl-contracts(developer surface),acdl-evidence(GitHub Pages audit timeline). - L1 modules (single-purpose, substrate-agnostic, max-depth-1 primitives) as folders with
manifest.yaml+mock_apply.sh. - L2 modules (composed stacks, max-depth-5) grouping L1s into deployable service shapes.
- L3A developer surface: commit
contract.yamltoacdl-contracts. - L3B agentic surface: Python keyword parser turning an Issue body into
contract.yaml. - Confidence signal: base 0.90, drops to 0.40 on policy violation; gate threshold ≥ 0.50.
- Evidence stream: hash-chained
audit.jsonpublished via Pages + vanilla-JSindex.htmltimeline. - Reusable CI workflow: Dev (autonomous) → QA (manual approval) → Prod (manual approval) → finalize.
Active
- 8 L1 modules (serverless/container focus):
l1-eks-fargate,l1-iam-role,l1-lambda,l1-api-gateway,l1-eventbridge,l1-sqs,l1-s3,l1-cloudwatch. - 4 L2 modules mirroring S&P Global Energy / Platts use cases:
l2-invoice-service,l2-commodity-price-feed,l2-energy-analytics-api,l2-regulatory-reporting. - 5 core scripts:
mock_executor.sh,policy_checker.py,confidence_signal.py,evidence_writer.py,l3b_agent_stub.py. - Issue-triggered workflow in
acdl-contractsthat runs the L3B parser, commits a new branch, closes the issue, and triggers the main pipeline. - Evidence stream UI (
index.html) fetchingaudit.jsonand rendering events as a timeline.
Out of Scope
- Real cloud provisioning (AWS/GCP/Azure).
- Real LLM inference / external AI APIs.
- Production-grade infrastructure or multi-tenant isolation.
- Real cryptographic tamper-proofing (the hash chain is demonstrative, not adversarially secure).
Constraints
- Environment: local Linux OS.
- CI/CD: GitHub/Gitea Actions + Environments (QA, Prod approval gates).
- No cloud — absolutely no AWS, GCP, or Azure resources.
- No AI — no OpenAI or external LLM APIs; the "Agentic" part is a keyword parser.
- All state in flat JSON files or CI artifacts.
- Compute strategy: EKS Fargate + serverless primitives (no VPC module).
- L1 modules are single-purpose, substrate-agnostic, do not compose with other L1s.
- L2 modules combine L1 primitives into deployable shapes, max depth 5.
Context
- Forge: Gitea at
https://git.cloudinit.dev, orgcontinuous-intelligence. - The
acdlrepo already exists (empty) at org root and serves as the platform/meta repo. acdl-contractsandacdl-evidencewill be created as additional repos in the same org.- act_runner / Gitea Actions is the CI runtime; "GitHub Actions" workflow YAML is reused as-is.
Key Decisions
| ID | Decision | Rationale | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| D-001 | Use Gitea org continuous-intelligence for all repos |
User-specified target org; already exists | Single source of truth for the demo |
| D-002 | Map "GitHub Actions" to Gitea Actions (act_runner) | Environment is Gitea; same workflow YAML syntax | Demo runs on the actual forge |
| D-003 | Collapse acdl-platform into the existing acdl repo |
acdl already exists empty at org root |
3 repos total: acdl, acdl-contracts, acdl-evidence |
| D-004 | Use Gitea environment blocks + required reviewers for QA/Prod; fallback to manual workflow_dispatch with approval input |
Approval gates required by spec; forge supports environment protection | Frictionless approval gates |
| D-005 | Hash-chained ledger (prev_hash + own hash) for evidence; declared demonstrative |
Spec asks for simple JSON; chain gives visible tamper-evidence | Visible audit timeline without overengineering |
| D-006 | Confidence gate threshold = 0.50 exactly | Explicit in spec | Acts 2/4 behave as scripted |
| D-007 | Each mock_apply.sh echoes [L1: <name>] applying... + OK, sleeps 1s, exits 0 |
Spec literal; uniformity aids timeline parsing | Predictable evidence events |
| D-008 | Keyword→stack mapping for L3B: gas/price/ingest/data-lake → commodity-price-feed; invoice/billing → invoice-service; analytics/historical/query → energy-analytics-api; regulatory/compliance/reporting/trading → regulatory-reporting; fallback → invoice-service | Mirrors the 4 L2 modules + Act 3 example issue | Act 3 reproduces deterministic behavior |
| D-009 | Init milestone = v1.0, branch milestone/v1.0-initial |
init.md Step 5 mandate | Branching strategy follows convention |
| D-010 | Single-project mode for the acdl checkout |
User chose standalone single-project | ---ci--- blocks omit project: field |