Major rework of both presentation decks based on leadership feedback. Addresses: story arc, concept clarity, scope clarification, more visuals, appendix for detail-heavy slides, and a complete Road to the North Star. 6 new mermaid diagrams: - platform-works-03-scope-boundary (Upstream → Contract → ACDL → AWS) - developer-experience-01b-scope-boundary (both consumer paths + scope) - platform-works-04-confidence-signal (6 inputs → score → gate → decision) - platform-works-05-attestation-flow (deploy → gate → approver → evidence) - developer-experience-04-promotion-journey (dev → qa → prod → dr) - road-to-north-star (v1.0 demo → v1.9 → v1.10 → v2.0 → North Star) Both Marp decks restructured to 10 main + 6 appendix slides: PW deck (17 slides): 1. Title 2. The Problem & The North Star (anti-goals moved to slide 3) 3. Where ACDL Sits in Your World (NEW — scope boundary, infra only) 4. The Contract-Driven Model (image: removed, infra inputs instead) 5. The End-to-End Flow 6. Zero-Trust by Default 7. Safety is Computed (NEW confidence signal diagram) 8. Security by Construction 9. Accountability & Audit (NEW attestation flow diagram, QA clarification, badge reclassification: dev=Testing, qa/prod/dr=Planned) 10. Testing vs. Planned (summary, full inventory in appendix) 11. The Vision Realized + Appendix: TOC, Platform-Managed Environments, Observability, Road to North Star, Full Inventory, Glossary DX deck (16 slides): 1. Title 2. Where ACDL Sits in Your World (REPLACES Two Consumer Surfaces — scope boundary with both consumer paths) 3. The Contract — The Entire Consumer Surface (image: removed) 4. The Developer Feedback Loop 5. Versioned, Predictable Releases 6. Friendly Onboarding 7. Safe Promotion Path (NEW promotion journey diagram, rising bar annotated: dev=Testing, qa/prod/dr=Planned) 8. Safe Decommission 9. Self-Service Module Catalog 10. The Desired Outcomes + Appendix: TOC, Citizen Developer Experience, No Platform Code, Local Reproducibility, Road to North Star, Glossary Story arc: every slide has an italic 'Story beat' line connecting it to the narrative progression. Scope clarification: ACDL is infrastructure only. Upstream is anything (IDE, agentic SDLC, citizen dev vibe coding). ACDL provisions and governs AWS resources; application deployment is upstream. Contract examples now show infrastructure inputs (cpu, memory, desired_count, port) not image:. QA attestation reclassification: 'Design tested' → 'Planned'. QA attests to infrastructure readiness (contract + Terraform plan + evidence), not application code. Dev is autonomous (Testing); qa/prod/dr are Planned. Road to the North Star: phased timeline (v1.0 → v1.9 → v1.10 → v2.0 → North Star), annotated 'proposed phasing, not formally planned.' Also: scripts/sync_to_gl.sh added (GitLab mirror sync utility). ---ci--- phase: 51 milestone: v1.9 status: complete requirements: covered: [] partial: [] ---/ci---
14 KiB
marp, theme, paginate, size, header, footer, style
| marp | theme | paginate | size | header | footer | style |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| true | default | true | 16x9 | The Developer Experience | Internal | section { font-family: "Akkurat Pro", "Helvetica Neue", "Arial", sans-serif; font-size: 22px; color: #1B1B1B; } h1 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 34px; margin-bottom: 0.3em; } h2 { color: #D6002A; font-size: 26px; margin-bottom: 0.2em; } section.title { background: #1B1B1B; color: #fff; border-top: 8px solid #D6002A; } section.title h1 { color: #fff; } table { font-size: 18px; width: 100%; } th { background: #F0F0F0; } blockquote { border-left: 4px solid #D6002A; color: #2E2E2E; font-size: 20px; } pre { font-size: 14px; line-height: 1.3; } code { font-size: 14px; } img { display: block; margin: 0 auto; max-height: 280px; } em.story { color: #6B7280; font-size: 16px; font-style: italic; } .badge { display: inline-block; padding: 2px 8px; border-radius: 4px; font-size: 14px; font-weight: 600; } .testing { background: #DBEAFE; color: #1E3A5F; } .planned { background: #fef3c7; color: #78350f; } .agentic { background: #EDE9FE; color: #4C1D95; } |
The Developer Experience
Agentic Cloud Delivery Platform
<style> section.title h1 { font-size: 44px; margin-bottom: 0.1em; } section.title h3 { color: #F0F0F0; font-weight: 400; font-size: 22px; margin-top: 0; } </style>Where ACDL Sits in Your World
Story beat: Here's who uses the platform and where the boundary is.
- Technical developer — owns app code + a contract + a thin CI definition
- Citizen developer — declares intent in plain language; an AI agent produces a contract that passes the same safety envelope Agentic
- Upstream is anything — your IDE, an agentic SDLC, or vibe coding on a laptop. ACDL doesn't care how the contract was produced
- ACDL is infrastructure only — it provisions and governs AWS resources. Application deployment is upstream
The Contract — The Entire Consumer Surface
Story beat: Now let's look at what a consumer actually writes — it's tiny.
Three things. That is the entire consumer-side surface.
- 1. App code — the consumer's service, at the top level of the repo
- 2. A contract — a single YAML file: module, environment, inputs
uses: acdl/pipelines/deploy.yaml@v1.6
module: microservice
environment: dev
inputs:
cpu: 256
memory: 512
desired_count: 2
port: 8080
- 3. A one-line CI definition — a thin
uses:wrapper pointing at a versioned platform workflow - The developer does not: write infrastructure modules, clone the platform repo, hold cloud credentials, or maintain a state backend
The Developer Feedback Loop
Story beat: Once you push, here's what you see — in real time, in your own logs.
Developers see what the platform is doing, in real time. Testing
- Streamed output by default — the infrastructure plan, policy-check results, and each check record flow to stdout
- PR comments after every successful pipeline stage — a developer always knows where they stand without refreshing a dashboard
- Clear, explainable halt reasons — a policy violation, an insufficient confidence signal, or a missing attestation. Never an opaque debugging exercise.
- Connection strings posted as PR comments — human-readable, no hunting
- Runtime secrets in encrypted Parameter Store — KMS-encrypted, namespaced, no raw secrets in logs
- Errors become GitHub issues, automatically — a failed deploy opens an issue on the platform repo
Versioned, Predictable Releases
Story beat: You control when you absorb platform improvements — no surprise upgrades.
Consumers control when they absorb platform improvements. Testing
- Floating MAJOR + MINOR tags (e.g.
@v1.6) — a consumer automatically receives patch updates within the line - Semantic versioning with a clear contract: interface → MAJOR, behavior → MINOR, lifecycle → PATCH
- A consumer can pin to an exact version for maximum stability, or float on MAJOR only (
@v1) to absorb new features on their own cadence - Unversioned references (
@main, bare) are discouraged — the versioned tag is the only immutability lever - Automated release job computes the next semver on merge to main, creates the tag, and updates the floating tags
Friendly Onboarding
Story beat: First impressions matter — the platform fails gracefully, not opaquely.
First impressions of a platform are made when it fails for the first time. The platform fails gracefully. Testing
When no environment is bound, the platform emits a user-friendly onboarding prompt instead of failing opaquely:
- That no environment is bound to their repo yet
- What the platform will provision on their behalf (account, network, state, role)
- The expected turnaround for the platform team to grant the environment
- How to request an environment
The pipeline then exits without attempting a deployment — no partial state, no confusing errors.
Citizen developer onboarding path: planned
Safe Promotion Path
Story beat: Promotion is a workflow choice, not a contract edit — and the bar rises automatically.
The contract is environment-agnostic. The platform raises the bar automatically.
|
Approach A — One contract, one job per environment. Environment passed by each job. |
Approach B — Environment-specific contracts. When inputs differ per environment. |
Safe Decommission
Story beat: Tearing down is as deliberate as deploying — and just as gated.
Tearing down a stack is as deliberate as deploying one. Testing
uses: acdl/.github/workflows/deploy.yml@v1.8
with:
contract: .acdl/contract.yaml
mode: decommission
changeRequestId: "CHG0678912"
A 2-step pipeline with two SRE human-attestation gates:
- Validate the change request — the platform queries the CMDB; the CR must be
approvedand match the consumer repo - Disable deletion protection → SRE approves → Zero all counts + destroy → a second SRE approves
The per-stack encryption key enters a grace window (default 30 days) so encrypted data remains recoverable.
Self-Service Module Catalog
Story beat: You don't author infrastructure — you pick from pre-built, security-reviewed building blocks.
Developers pick from pre-built, security-reviewed building blocks. Testing
- Primitives — single-purpose resources (S3, VPC, ECS, IAM, load balancer, container registry, CloudFront, WAF, RDS), each with documented inputs/outputs, usage, compliance extension points, and versioning
- Modules — composed patterns (a static site with CDN + WAF; a microservice with VPC + ECS + load balancer + registry)
- Validated examples per module —
simple.yaml+complex.yaml+ variation files, validated against the contract schema in CI. Examples cannot drift from the schema silently - Auto-promotion of patterns — auto-promoted to the catalog after 3 observed usages Planned Agentic
- Compliance extension points — each module lists where GDPR, SOX, SOC2, DORA controls will wire in Planned
The Desired Outcomes
Story beat: Here's what this delivers to the organization.
- Velocity without sacrificing safety. Speed is in the ergonomics (a simple contract, a one-line
uses:); safety is in the gates the consumer cannot bypass. - Security, observability, and compliance as platform defaults — not per-team effort, not post-hoc remediation.
- Auditability as a byproduct, not a project. Every production change is traceable to a human attestation and a tamper-evident evidence event.
- Blast radius contained by design. Zero-trust OIDC + ABAC means a consumer can only touch its own tagged resources.
- The bottleneck moves off the platform team's ticket queue. A merged change progresses through lower environments without a platform engineer joining a thread.
- Infrastructure as a utility, not a craft. Teams consume infrastructure, they don't maintain it — and the platform compounds value over time by learning from recurring patterns.
- A path to the citizen developer. The same safety envelope that serves a senior engineer will serve a non-technical consumer. Agentic
Appendix
For deep dives — these slides cover details omitted from the main 10.
Contents:
- The Citizen Developer Experience (full)
- No Platform Code, No Cloning (detail)
- Local Reproducibility (detail)
- The Road to the North Star (phased roadmap)
- Glossary
A1 — The Citizen Developer Experience
A non-technical consumer ships a production deployment by declaring intent — without authoring a workflow, a configuration file, or an infrastructure module.
- The consumer opens an issue describing what they need (e.g. "a web API for the pricing service")
- An AI agent maps the intent to a contract referencing a module from the reviewed skill catalog
- The contract enters the same pipeline and must clear the same confidence gate before promotion
Guardrails that make this safe:
- Skills are versioned, signed, and reviewed for sensitive data before release (Infra & Ops owns the review)
- Agents are stateless — all state lives in the platform; the platform trusts and always verifies
- The agent's trace and submission confidence are captured in the contract for review
Skill catalog + real agent runtime: planned Agentic
A2 — No Platform Code, No Cloning
Consumers uses: a versioned central workflow. The platform fetches itself at run time. The consumer never touches platform internals.
- The consumer's CI definition is a thin wrapper — one
uses:line - The runner checks out the consumer repo, then checks out the platform repo into the workspace
- The platform installs its own runtime dependencies — the consumer installs nothing
- When the platform ships a fix, every consumer on a floating tag gets it on their next run
A3 — Local Reproducibility
The entire CI pipeline runs from the shell, not just in CI. Testing
scripts/run_ci.shmirrors the CI pipeline locally — the same three stages (lint → test → check-only) in sequencescripts/run_platform.sh --check-onlyruns the platform offline — no AWS, no policy engine, no outbox required. Validates a contract end-to-end before pushing--plan-onlyruns through the infrastructure plan without applying- The CI and deploy pipelines are defined by declarative contracts (YAML instances validated against JSON Schemas) — a single source of truth that both workflows implement
A4 — The Road to the North Star
Proposed phasing — not formally planned.
A5 — Glossary
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| OIDC | OpenID Connect — federation protocol for short-lived tokens, no long-lived credentials |
| ABAC | Attribute-Based Access Control — access scoped by resource tags + repo identity, not roles |
| CMK | Customer-Managed Key — per-stack encryption key, 90-day rotation, no shared keys |
| CMDB | Configuration Management Database — validates change requests for decommission |
| RPO | Recovery Point Objective — RPO = 0 means evidence is written synchronously, no data loss |
| HITL | Human-in-the-Loop — deliberate human attestation required for qa/prod/dr environments |
| VCS | Version Control System — the git hosting platform (GitHub, Gitea, GitLab) |
| NFR | Non-Functional Requirement — encryption, tagging, observability standards |



