Files

T

Jon Chery 0d2cbdb423 feat(P1): remove gitea/gitlab from synced files + simplify docs (REQ-230,231,232)

Genericize forge-detection code: gitea→forge/generic_forge, GITEA_ACTOR→FORGE_ACTOR.
Drop .gitea byte-identity test assertions (keep GitHub-side + contract conformance).
Add test_no_forge_mentions.py guard test (REQ-230).
Delete completed migration docs (NOVA_MIGRATION.md, NOVA_AWS_MIGRATION.md).
Move NO_HUMANS_THESIS.md to .ciagent/ (internal artifact).
Strip ciagent-internal provenance from synced docs (REQ-/D-/P-/CAP- IDs,
milestone headers, .ciagent/PROJECT.md citations).
Trim README.md (reusable deploy section, local key rotation paragraph).
Fix version-tag drift (@v1.13→@v1.19, acdl/→nova/).

---ci---
project: acdl
phase: 1
milestone: v1.20
status: execute
requirements: [REQ-230, REQ-231, REQ-232]
---/ci---

2026-08-07 18:20:29 +00:00

3.6 KiB

Raw Blame History

RACI — Who Owns What

D-139). This page is the citizen-developer-facing copy.

Nova's delivery lifecycle has three roles. This page clarifies who owns what — so the citizen developer knows what they bring, what the platform provides, and what is co-owned.

The Three Roles

Citizen Developer (CD)

That's you — the consumer (technical developer L3A or non-technical L3B). You are Responsible for all Functional Requirements (FRs) and User Acceptance Testing (UAT). You produce the FRs + UAT via your AI coding agent, an upstream agentic SDLC platform, or any upstream development platform. The source does not matter — all are subject to the same compliance standards (the submission-readiness gate, the contract schema, the policy envelope, the immutable audit stream). Nova validates the submission, not the author.

Platform (Nova)

Nova is Responsible for all Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), Infrastructure (cloud resource lifecycle, state, IAM), QA (the platform-side quality checks: policy enforcement, confidence scoring, schema validation), and Production deployments to cloud (the apply path, the pipeline, the release mechanics).

Release Management (RM) — co-owned

The release is co-owned. The platform performs the QA + SRE attestations agentically (it runs the confidence signal, the policy checks, the separation-of-duties). The citizen developer oversees and triggers the actual release — the human attestation at the stage gate is your authorization. The platform runs the checks; you authorize the promotion. This is the "autonomy in operations, human at stage gates" model.

The Matrix

Work Category	Citizen Developer	Platform	Release Management
Functional Requirements (FRs)	R/A	C	I
User Acceptance Testing (UAT)	R/A	C	I
Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs)	I	R/A	C
Infrastructure (cloud, state, IAM)	I	R/A	C
QA (policy, confidence, schema checks)	C	R/A	I
Production deployment to cloud	I	R/A	C
Release attestation (QA + SRE sign-off)	A	R	R

Key: R = Responsible (does the work) · A = Accountable (owns the outcome, sign-off) · C = Consulted · I = Informed.

What This Means in Practice

You (Citizen Developer) bring:

Your application code + a contract that declares intent.
Your FRs (what the application does).
Your UAT (you accept the deployment when it meets your FRs).

Nova (Platform) provides:

The NFRs (security, observability, compliance — baked into the pipeline, not your concern).
The infrastructure (cloud resources, state management, IAM scoping).
The QA (policy enforcement, confidence scoring, schema validation).
The production deployment (the apply path, the pipeline, the release).

You co-own the release:

Nova runs the attestations (QA confidence, SRE operational readiness).
You authorize the promotion at the stage gate. No promotion happens without your recorded attestation.

Compliance Standards Apply Equally

Your FRs + UAT may come from any source — an AI coding agent, an agentic SDLC platform, or a traditional IDE. Nova does not differentiate. All submissions pass through the same gate (schemas/submission-readiness.schema.json): tags, environment metadata, policy preconditions, profile markers. The compliance standards are the same regardless of how the code was authored. This is by design: the audit trail is the same, the policy envelope is the same, the evidence stream is the same. The source does not matter; the submission does.

3.6 KiB Raw Blame History