# Nova Identity Layer — Threat Model > **REQ-347** — identity-layer threat model. Covers the 8 threats > enumerated below + the **C-9.2 INV-18..21 compression audit**. The > C-6.2 grill additions (JWKS DDoS, PAT max TTL, ABAC fail-closed) are > integrated into the threat list, not appended. > > Scope: the Nova-idp identity layer (`nova-idp-auth` + > `nova-idp-token-vend` + `nova-idp-jwks` Lambdas, the KMS signing key, > the 4 DynamoDB tables, the `nova auth` CLI, the PAT lifecycle). Out > of scope: the downstream contract resolver, Terraform adapter, and > consumer-side auth (those have their own threat models). ## 1. Assets | Asset | Where | Sensitivity | |-------|-------|-------------| | User passwords | `nova-users.password_hash` (Argon2id) | high — hash only; raw never stored | | PATs (personal access tokens) | `nova-pats` (hash only) + returned to caller once | high — bearer token, ≤24h/≤1h TTL | | OIDC tokens | `~/.nova/credentials.json` (0600) + in-flight to clients | medium — short-lived (15 min default) | | KMS signing key | KMS `alias/nova-oidc-signing` (`ECC_NIST_P256`) | high — the trust anchor for all OIDC tokens | | ABAC policy | `platform/abac/token-vend.policy` (git-tracked) | high — the authorization rules | | DynamoDB tables | `nova-users`, `nova-sessions`, `nova-password-resets`, `nova-pats` | high — the identity store | | JWKS endpoint | `nova-idp-jwks` function URL (`AuthType: NONE`) | medium — public, must be available but is not secret | | Audit stream | stderr JSON from each Lambda + the CLI | high — tamper-evidence for the whole layer | ## 2. Trust boundaries ``` ┌────────────────┐ IAM-auth function URL ┌────────────────────┐ │ Developer CI │ ───────────────────────────► │ nova-idp-auth │ │ (nova CLI) │ │ nova-idp-token-vend│ │ │ ◄────── OIDC token ───────── │ (KMS sign) │ └────────┬───────┘ └─────────┬──────────┘ │ │ │ ~/.nova/credentials.json (0600) │ strong-read GetItem │ NOT the raw PAT ▼ │ ┌────────────────────┐ │ │ nova-pats (DDB) │ │ │ nova-users/sessions│ │ JWKS fetch (unauthenticated) └────────────────────┘ │ ──────────────────────────────────► ┌────────────────────┐ │ │ nova-idp-jwks │ │ ◄──── public key (JWK) ──────────── │ (AuthType: NONE) │ ▼ └────────────────────┘ ┌────────────────┐ │ AWS KMS │ kms:Sign (token-vend role only) │ alias/nova- │ kms:GetPublicKey (jwks role) │ oidc-signing │ └────────────────┘ ``` The key boundary crossings: 1. **Internet → JWKS Lambda** (unauthenticated function URL) — the DDoS surface (Threat T-4). 2. **CLI → auth/token-vend Lambdas** (IAM-authenticated function URLs) — the credential-injection surface. 3. **token-vend Lambda → KMS** (`kms:Sign`) — the key-use surface. 4. **token-vend Lambda → DDB** (strong read on `nova-pats`) — the revocation surface. ## 3. Threats + mitigations ### T-1 — Password compromise (storage) **Threat:** an attacker with read access to `nova-users` (DDB export, backup, a leaked snapshot) recovers plaintext passwords. **Mitigations:** - **Argon2id hashing** with OWASP-minimum parameters (`time_cost=3, memory_cost=65536 KiB, parallelism=1`) — `core/lambda/nova_idp_auth.py:hash_password`. Argon2id is the recommended PHC winner; the parameters are the OWASP minimum (C-7.2). - **Fail-closed on Argon2 unavailable** (D-228): if the `argon2-cffi` C extension fails to import, `_ARGON2_AVAILABLE` is `False` and `hash_password`/`verify_password` raise `Argon2UnavailableError` → the handler returns **503**. **No pure-Python fallback, no weak hash, no crash.** Verified by `tests/test_argon2_fail_closed.py`. - **No raw passwords anywhere** (INV-16): the handler never logs the password argument; the audit scrubber (`_emit_audit`) pops any `password`/`new_password`/`old_password` kwarg defense-in-depth; the DDB item has `password_hash`, never `password`. Verified by `tests/test_idp_auth.py:TestNoRawPasswordsInLogs`. **Residual risk:** low. Argon2id with the OWASP params is GPU-resistant at scale; the remaining risk is a parameter-weakness advisory (mitigated by the 90-day KMS rotation cadence's analog for hash params — revisit annually). ### T-2 — PAT theft + max TTL (C-6.2) **Threat:** an attacker exfiltrates a PAT (filesystem read of `~/.nova/credentials.json`, a leaked CI env var, a phishing capture) and uses it to vend OIDC tokens until it expires. **Mitigations:** - **`~/.nova/credentials.json` stores the OIDC token + PAT metadata (`jti`, `exp`, `type`) ONLY — NOT the raw PAT** (C-7.3). The raw PAT is entered once at `nova auth login` and never persisted. An attacker who reads the credentials file gets a short-lived OIDC token (15 min default), not the long-lived PAT. Verified by `tests/test_auth_commands.py:test_login_stores_oidc_token_not_raw_pat`. - **Max TTL (C-6.2):** developer PATs ≤ 24h (86400s), service-account PATs ≤ 1h (3600s). Enforced in `core.pat_lifecycle.issue_pat` — requests above the max are clamped (with an audit event). The shorter service-account TTL bounds the CI blast radius. - **Revocation via strong-read DDB (D-229):** the token-vend Lambda does `GetItem(PK=jti, ConsistentRead=True)` on `nova-pats` on every vend. A revocation (`status=revoked`) is reflected on the next vend within **60s P95** (the strong read is synchronous — the 60s is the P95 propagation bound, not a polling delay). Verified by `tests/test_pat_revocation.py:test_pat_revocation_slo` (asserts `<1s` locally). - **Emergency revocation at the DDB level** (when the CLI is unavailable): `aws dynamodb update-item --table-name nova-pats ...` flips `status` to `revoked` — see `docs/operator-guide-idp.md` §9. **Residual risk:** medium. The PAT is a bearer token — theft is undetectable until the attacker vends a token. Mitigation is TTL bounding + revocation, not prevention. The 1h service-account cap is the primary control for CI exposure. ### T-3 — JWKS unauthenticated endpoint DDoS (C-6.2) **Threat:** the JWKS endpoint (`nova-idp-jwks` function URL, `AuthType: NONE`) is a public, unauthenticated target. An attacker can flood it with requests, exhausting Lambda concurrency and making token verification fail for all clients (a cheap DoS). **Mitigations:** - **Reserved concurrency (10, max ~100 RPS):** the JWKS Lambda has a reserved-concurrency limit of 10 (set in the CloudFormation template). This caps the blast radius — a flood saturates the JWKS Lambda but does NOT exhaust the account-wide concurrency pool, so `nova-idp-auth` and `nova-idp-token-vend` keep serving. - **Client-side caching (1h):** the JWKS response carries `Cache-Control: max-age=3600`. Clients (`pyjwt.PyJWK` client) cache the keys for 1h, so a JWKS outage does not immediately break verification — already-cached keys keep working. - **Optional CloudFront + WAF (rate-based rule):** `nova idp setup --apply --public-jwks-domain ` fronts the function URL with a CloudFront distribution + a WAF web ACL with a rate-based rule (e.g. block an IP after 2000 req/5min). **For any public deployment, set `--public-jwks-domain`.** Without it the function URL is bare — fine for piloting, exposed for production. **Residual risk:** medium. The reserved concurrency bounds the cost but a determined attacker can still keep the JWKS Lambda saturated. The WAF + CloudFront path is the production-grade control. JWKS is inherently public (clients MUST fetch it without auth) — this is a fundamental OIDC property, not a Nova design flaw. ### T-4 — ABAC bypass (C-6.1 / C-7.1) **Threat:** the ABAC policy engine (`kyverno-json` / `kj`) fails to load, crashes, or is misconfigured, and the token-vend Lambda vends a token anyway (fails open). This would bypass the authorization gate — every active PAT gets a token regardless of the policy. **Mitigations:** - **Fail-closed (C-6.1/C-7.1 — the grill's #1 finding):** the token-vend Lambda's `_evaluate_abac_fail_closed` returns `(False, [], "", "abac_eval_failed")` if: - `KyvernoJsonEngine.is_configured()` returns `False` (`kj` absent), - `get_engine()` raises (engine registry error), - `evaluate_token_vend_policy()` raises (policy parse error, `kj` runtime error). In all three cases the Lambda returns **403** + an audit event `token.vend.denied` (reason `abac_eval_failed`). **Never fails open.** This is INV-17's runtime guarantee — without it, INV-17 is documentation, not a control. - **Verified by `tests/test_abac_fail_closed.py` (7 tests):** engine-not-configured, evaluate-raises, policy-parse-error, ABAC denies, revoked PAT, unknown PAT, audit-event-emitted-on-denial. - **Policy version in every audit event (D-231):** the git blob SHA of `platform/abac/token-vend.policy` is recorded in every `token.vend.allowed`/`token.vend.denied` event. An auditor can reconstruct which policy version governed each vend. **Residual risk:** low (given the fail-closed semantics). The remaining risk is a policy-authoring bug (the policy allows too much) — mitigated by PR review (D-231: Platform Security owns the policy) and the policy-version audit trail. ### T-5 — KMS signing key compromise **Threat:** an attacker gains `kms:Sign` permission on `alias/nova-oidc-signing` and forges OIDC tokens. **Mitigations:** - **KMS key policy restricts `kms:Sign` to the token-vend Lambda role.** No other principal (including the operator) can sign. The JWKS Lambda role has `kms:GetPublicKey` only (not `Sign`). - **Key rotation (90 days):** the alias is re-pointed to a new `ECC_NIST_P256` key every 90 days (see `docs/operator-guide-idp.md` §6). The old key stays enabled during the overlap window (≥ max PAT TTL = 24h) so already-issued tokens keep verifying, then is disabled + scheduled for deletion. - **JWKS serves both `kid`s during the overlap window:** the JWKS endpoint lists all keys the alias has pointed at that are still enabled. Clients verify against the `kid` in the token header. **Residual risk:** low. KMS key policies are the primary control; rotation bounds the exposure window of a stolen key. ### T-6 — DER → raw ECDSA signature conversion bug (C-5.2 gotcha) **Threat:** KMS `sign()` returns a **DER-encoded** ASN.1 ECDSA signature. JWS (RFC 7515 §3.1.3) requires the **raw** `r‖s` concatenation, each coordinate 32 bytes big-endian (for P-256). If the conversion is wrong (wrong byte order, wrong padding, wrong coordinate length), the resulting JWT will not verify with standard libraries (`pyjwt`, `jose`) — or worse, verifies with a *different* signature than intended (a subtle correctness + security bug). This is the **#1 implementation risk** identified in RESEARCH §5. The conversion is in `core/kms_signing.py:der_to_raw_ecdsa`: ```python r, s = decode_dss_signature(der_sig) # cryptography's ASN.1 parser return r.to_bytes(32, "big") + s.to_bytes(32, "big") # raw r‖s ``` **Mitigations:** - **`decode_dss_signature` from `cryptography`** parses the DER (not a hand-rolled ASN.1 parser — that would be the real risk). - **`to_bytes(32, "big")` zero-pads** each coordinate to exactly 32 bytes. A coordinate shorter than 32 bytes (high-order zero bytes) is padded; a coordinate longer than 32 bytes raises `ValueError` (the guard at the top of `der_to_raw_ecdsa`). - **Verified by `tests/test_kms_roundtrip.py` (CAP-037):** sign a JWT via `kms_signing.sign_jwt()` (mock KMS with a test ECC keypair) → fetch JWKS via the JWKS Lambda → verify with `pyjwt` + the JWKS key. The round-trip succeeds only if the DER→raw conversion is byte-correct. This is the regression gate for any change to `kms_signing.py`. **Residual risk:** low (given the round-trip test). A KMS-side format change (AWS changes the DER encoding) would break the test loudly. ### T-7 — No AWS-managed identity (INV-15) **Threat:** (architectural invariant, not an attack.) Nova-idp depends on Cognito, IAM Identity Center, or another AWS-managed identity service, creating a vendor lock-in and an opaque trust boundary. **Mitigation:** - **INV-15 (no AWS-managed identity in path):** Nova-idp uses **KMS + DDB + Lambda only.** No Cognito, no IAM Identity Center, no managed user pools. The identity layer is greenfield and fully owned by Nova. This is a constraint, not a mitigation — it shapes the whole design (Argon2id in Lambda instead of Cognito user pools; KMS-signed JWTs instead of Cognito issued tokens; DDB `nova-pats` instead of IAM access keys). - **Verified by inspection:** `core/lambda/nova_idp_auth.py` + `nova_idp_token_vend.py` import only `boto3` (DDB + KMS), `argon2`, `cryptography`, `pyjwt`, and `core.*`. No `cognitoidp` or `identitystore` client calls anywhere in the identity layer. **Residual risk:** none (this is a satisfied constraint, not a residual). The trade-off is operational burden (Nova runs its own password hashing, token signing, revocation) in exchange for portability and no opaque trust boundary. ### T-8 — Audit trail integrity **Threat:** an attacker tampers with the audit stream to hide a malicious vend, a revocation, or a policy change. **Mitigations:** - **Every event emitted (INV-12):** `cli.invocation`, `auth.sign_up`, `auth.sign_in`, `auth.session_created`, `pat.issued`, `pat.revoked`, `token.vend.allowed`, `token.vend.denied`, `auth.login`, `auth.status`, `auth.revoke` — each is a JSON line on stderr with a timestamp + the relevant identifiers (`user_id`, `jti`, `sub`, `policy_sha`). - **Policy version (git SHA, D-231) in every token-vend event:** the `policy_sha` field lets an auditor reconstruct which policy version governed each vend — a policy change is visible in the audit stream as a `policy_sha` change. - **Raw credentials scrubbed (INV-16/INV-17 spirit):** the `_emit_audit` functions in `nova_idp_auth.py`, `nova_idp_token_vend.py`, and `pat_lifecycle.py` pop any `password`/`pat`/`token`/`raw_pat` kwarg defense-in-depth. The audit stream carries identifiers, not secrets. - **Revoked PATs retained (REQ-343):** `nova-pats` rows are marked `status=revoked`, never deleted. The audit trail of "who was revoked, when" is queryable. **Residual risk:** medium (audit integrity is only as strong as the log destination). The Lambdas emit to stderr (CloudWatch Logs by default); the integrity guarantee depends on the downstream log pipeline (immutability, retention). For high-assurance deployments, forward the audit stream to an append-only store (S3 Object Lock, a write-once log service). This is a deployment concern, documented in the operator guide. --- ## 4. C-9.2 — INV-18..21 compression audit The source spec (the v1.28 design document that was re-mapped into this repo's REQ-323..353 / INV-12..17 — see `REQUIREMENTS.md` §v1.28 "ID re-mapping") referenced `INV-18..21` as "attestation invariants." Those IDs **do not exist in this repo** (this repo's invariants run INV-1..11 for the blockchain/pilot work and INV-12..17 for v1.28). The grill (C-9.2) requires an audit verifying the spec's attestation invariant semantics were fully captured by the re-mapped INV-15/INV-16/INV-17 + REQ-332, with no semantic gap. ### The spec's attestation invariant semantics (reconstructed) The source spec's INV-18..21 expressed four attestation concerns: 1. **Immutability** — an attestation, once made, cannot be silently altered. 2. **Signature verifiability** — the attestation's signature can be independently verified by a third party holding the public key. 3. **Key derivation** — the signing key is derived from a known input (the PAT) via a specified KDF, not ad-hoc. 4. **No AWS-managed identity** — the attestation scheme does not depend on Cognito / IAM Identity Center (the greenfield constraint). ### Mapping to the re-mapped invariants + requirements | Spec concern | Re-mapped to | Where enforced | |--------------|--------------|----------------| | Immutability | **INV-6** (existing, pre-v1.28 — the immutable audit ledger) + **INV-17** (ABAC discipline — every vend is audited with `policy_sha`) | the audit stream is append-only; `policy_sha` binds each vend to a policy version | | Signature verifiability | **REQ-332** (JWS-from-PAT KDF) + **REQ-337** (KMS-signed OIDC, JWKS verifiable) | `core/jws_attestation.py:verify_attestation` (HS256, constant-time compare); `core/kms_signing.py` + JWKS endpoint | | Key derivation | **REQ-332** (C-5.2 grill fix) — `HKDF-SHA256(PAT, salt='nova-local-attestation', info='jws-signing-key')` → 32-byte symmetric key | `core/jws_attestation.py:derive_signing_key`; verified by `tests/test_jws_attestation.py` | | No AWS-managed identity | **INV-15** (no Cognito / IAM Identity Center in path) | inspection — the identity layer uses KMS + DDB + Lambda only | ### Conclusion: the compression is sound — no semantic gap The spec's four attestation concerns are covered by: - **INV-6** (immutability — the existing audit ledger, carried forward from pre-v1.28 milestones), - **INV-15** (no AWS-managed identity — the greenfield constraint), - **INV-16** (password storage — the Argon2id + no-raw-password rule, which is the attestation *input* integrity for signup), - **INV-17** (ABAC discipline — every vend is policy-gated + audited with `policy_sha`), - **REQ-332** (JWS-from-PAT KDF — the signature + key-derivation scheme for local-review attestations). The re-mapping from `INV-18..21` → `INV-15/16/17 + REQ-332` is a **compression** (4 invariants → 3 invariants + 1 requirement), not a **drop**. The four original concerns (immutability, signature verifiability, key derivation, no-managed-identity) each have a load-bearing home in the re-mapped set. **No attestation invariant semantics were silently dropped.** The compression is *justified* because: - INV-6 already covered audit immutability (re-stating it as INV-18 would have been a duplicate of an existing invariant). - INV-15 already covered the no-managed-identity constraint (re-stating it as INV-21 would have been a duplicate). - INV-16 + INV-17 cover the input-integrity + policy-discipline concerns that the spec's INV-19/20 expressed as attestation-specific invariants (they are in fact general identity-layer invariants, not attestation-specific). - REQ-332 carries the signature + KDF detail that the spec's INV-18 hand-waved ("public key derivable from the PAT") — and corrects it to a sound symmetric scheme (C-5.2). ### Audit verification (how to re-run this audit) ```sh # 1. Confirm INV-18..21 do not exist in this repo. grep -rE 'INV-1[89]|INV-2[01]' .ciagent/ docs/ core/ tests/ \ | grep -v 'INV-18..21' # only the C-9.2 audit references should remain # 2. Confirm the re-mapped invariants + REQ-332 exist + are tested. pytest tests/test_jws_attestation.py tests/test_abac_fail_closed.py \ tests/test_kms_roundtrip.py tests/test_argon2_fail_closed.py -q ``` --- ## 5. Test coverage summary | Threat | Test file | What it verifies | |--------|-----------|------------------| | T-1 (password) | `tests/test_argon2_fail_closed.py` | 503 on argon2 unavailable (no weak hash) | | T-1 (password) | `tests/test_idp_auth.py` | no raw password in DDB item or logs (INV-16) | | T-2 (PAT theft) | `tests/test_auth_commands.py` | credentials.json has OIDC token, NOT raw PAT (C-7.3) | | T-2 (PAT theft) | `tests/test_pat_revocation.py` | revocation takes effect <1s (D-229 SLO) | | T-3 (JWKS DDoS) | (CloudFormation template inspection) | reserved concurrency = 10; WAF with `--public-jwks-domain` | | T-4 (ABAC bypass) | `tests/test_abac_fail_closed.py` (7 tests) | fail-closed on engine absent / error / deny (C-6.1) | | T-5 (KMS key) | `tests/test_kms_roundtrip.py` | KMS sign → JWKS → pyjwt verify (CAP-037) | | T-6 (DER→raw) | `tests/test_kms_roundtrip.py` | the round-trip succeeds only if DER→raw is byte-correct | | T-7 (no managed id) | (inspection) | no `cognitoidp` / `identitystore` imports in the identity layer | | T-8 (audit) | `tests/test_e2e_idp.py` | the full audit chain is present + linked (REQ-348) | --- ## 6. Open items (deferred, not blocking v1.28) - **WAF rate-limit tuning:** the default rate-based rule threshold (2000 req/5min/IP) is a pilot-scale guess. Production tuning needs real traffic data. Tracked as a post-v1.28 ops task. - **Audit log forwarding to an append-only store** (S3 Object Lock): the Lambdas emit to stderr / CloudWatch Logs by default. High- assurance deployments should forward to a write-once destination. Documented in the operator guide; not enforced in code. - **PAT theft detection:** there is no anomaly detection on PAT usage (e.g. a vend from a new geography). The TTL + revocation is the control. Detection is a future milestone.